All of the medical associations have been bought out and are controlled by Big Pharma. If that wasn't obvious to everyone BEFORE Covid, it sure should be now.
Given the choice between easy or hard money, most people will choose easy and go to their grave insisting it wasn't for the money. Vaccinating is easy: simple to administer, cheap to do, virtually without malpractice consequences, and infinitely flexible, as patients are quickly scared about what MIGHT happen because they have poor statistical understanding (check out FanDuel participation if you doubt this) - bait and switch them about a disease that will almost certainly not kill them or their kids (measles, for instance) but is a mere inconvenience, and you have parents lining up for it. That vaccine manufacturers and their physician enablers would object to a policy encouraging mere discussion about risks and benefits pulls the curtain right off what is really going on. That they found some trial-level judge in (surprise!) Massachusetts to toe the line for them is yet more telling. I'm eagerly awaiting the Supreme Court's response to this usurpation of administrative authority by the judiciary. BTW, "hard" money, in this context, would be curing or at least treating those who contract diseases and discriminating between real public health crises with gold-standard "safe and effective" vaccines (polio, smallpox), versus all the other illnesses that come down the road and are a consequence of being mortal.
Kennedy himself says he has NO proof, just a feeling. Well, isnt that convenient. Kennedy has admitted he has "no idea" if the shots caused it and states he cannot prove the link, though he considers it a "potential culprit".
All of the medical associations have been bought out and are controlled by Big Pharma. If that wasn't obvious to everyone BEFORE Covid, it sure should be now.
Including the New England Journal of Medicine
Oh, yes, all the "journals" as well. None are to be believed.
I believe this will backfire on them. I trust RFK to be guided as to how.
Given the choice between easy or hard money, most people will choose easy and go to their grave insisting it wasn't for the money. Vaccinating is easy: simple to administer, cheap to do, virtually without malpractice consequences, and infinitely flexible, as patients are quickly scared about what MIGHT happen because they have poor statistical understanding (check out FanDuel participation if you doubt this) - bait and switch them about a disease that will almost certainly not kill them or their kids (measles, for instance) but is a mere inconvenience, and you have parents lining up for it. That vaccine manufacturers and their physician enablers would object to a policy encouraging mere discussion about risks and benefits pulls the curtain right off what is really going on. That they found some trial-level judge in (surprise!) Massachusetts to toe the line for them is yet more telling. I'm eagerly awaiting the Supreme Court's response to this usurpation of administrative authority by the judiciary. BTW, "hard" money, in this context, would be curing or at least treating those who contract diseases and discriminating between real public health crises with gold-standard "safe and effective" vaccines (polio, smallpox), versus all the other illnesses that come down the road and are a consequence of being mortal.
Great reporting Lou!
That judge is a criminal and he knows it.
Kennedy is an idiot. I wouldn't listen to anything he has to say.
He himself was injured from vaccines. Quite certain he's for the children and he has a dog in this fight because of his own experiences.
Good grief, you believe him?
Kennedy himself says he has NO proof, just a feeling. Well, isnt that convenient. Kennedy has admitted he has "no idea" if the shots caused it and states he cannot prove the link, though he considers it a "potential culprit".
Margaret, you can do better than a two-sentence ad hominem attack! The message, not the messenger next time.