41 Comments
User's avatar
David LaFrance's avatar

Force injecting by holding a child against his/her will, Vaxxinating a child without parental consent, injecting a child with puberty blockers with parental approval or not is an attack and abuse upon a child and should be looked on and dealt with as a crime. Insane acts on children must be stopped.

truth seeker's avatar

What about parents who "think" they are doing something useful???

AS you point out its patently insane but alot worse.

truth seeker's avatar

"The “real science” for smallpox vaccines differs markedly from the “sketchy science” used to create and market mRNA Covid vaccines."

John has made 2 important assertions one of which is simply WRONG.

The mRNA quacine is not a vaccine by defintion. It is different from vaccines but not for the reason mentioned.

The "real science" for Smallpox, (or Polio, Diptheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Herpes, etc etc DOES NOT EXIST. Reports exist, bell curves exist, PhD's exist, Medical Dieties exist, Virologists exist...

For the sake of this discussion lets just stick with Smallpox shall we? John, or anyone else please do edify with the "real science" showing smallpox vaccine is effective??

Should be easy.

The truth is very different. No vax or quax is safe or... effective. That is a statement of fact.

All those believing otherwise... you were fooled and thus are fools who perpeputate this fraud.

There are many details...

Injecting aborted fetal tissue, formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum, monkey kidney tissue??

How could any thinking person believe this is health promoting???

John Wright's avatar

Tyranny. It's time people woke up to the realization that our government practices tyranny, not freedom.

bats3697's avatar

time to get rid of all l these evil bastards coming up with laws stealing rights or causing death on purpose

John Wright's avatar

Yes! For the past 100 years!

Fred Kittelmann's avatar

Yeah, anyone who thinks this is a free country fell for a slick brochure or something. Fell hard.

John Wright's avatar

It's what we were taught in school!

Julie Hemmings's avatar

It would be good to point out the powerful pro-Pharma lobby in the state of Massachusetts, and how much money they spend to lobby government officials. Too many people still believe that this is about health and they don’t understand the big money at stake. Show the financial interests to create a bigger picture.

truth seeker's avatar

It is money however that is one leg of a quadriped. The gubmint, the Medical Cartel also profit tremendously. The fake news echo chamber, lets not forget them. Clueless people?

Yes they believed that health comes from needles...

Tonya's avatar

Case law and precedent are immoral. Present courts should not be bound to the poor reasoning of prior courts.

The Jacobson decision should be overturned.

The government can have no compelling interest that violates bodily autonomy except to detain and incarcerate someone who has broken a *just* law, like no stealing or no murder, not an unjust law like mandatory vaccination.

Hudson E Baldwin lll's avatar

Unbelievable that a Court would have to mandate people to do the RIGHT THING!

ANTI VAX peeps are a completely new level of DUMBFUCKERY.

truth seeker's avatar

the non perjorative word is pureblood, those that inject aborted fetal tissue, formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum... What "level" is that Hud???

Hudson E Baldwin lll's avatar

You obviously don't comprehend the topic well enough to engage in an exchange about it. Bye

Aliss Terpstra's avatar

I understood the original decision to mean that citizens can be punished by a fine or forcible quarantine confinement, for refusing to obey a law requiring injection of a noxious substance that occasionally or even frequently results in avoidable damage and death, and does not perform as claimed to prevent infection and transmission despite misinformation, scientific fraud, propaganda and belief, but that citizens cannot be punished by forcible injection itself. Jacobson has clearly been misused. Every time it's misused, forcible injections become easier to apply the next time and resulting deaths and disabilities remain uncompensated. I don't know how to fix that. I keep thinking about how husband used to be able to legally rape wife even though wife clearly refused, but the law was changed and now husbands/ common-law partners CAN be charged with rape if they forcibly overcome objection. Forcible vaccination is pretty violent too, from the child's point of view. Law says beating your own child to disability or death is a crime but the government forcibly vaccinating it to disability or death is not.

TeeJae's avatar

"Rules for thee, but not for [those in power]."

Sonia Nordenson's avatar

". . . forcibly vaccinating that child," please—not "it."

S M's avatar
Mar 13Edited

For individual to have no right to refuse vaccine, the onus is on the state to prove:

a) that all vaccines are 100% safe

b) all vaccines prevent infection to the individual

c) all vaccines stop spread of disease

d) recording of symptoms v/s disease is 100% accurate

e) without vaccine individual is highly infectious, compared with vaccinated people

failing that it's a joke

Tonya's avatar

Your point (e) is especially important because during covid, ALL of the restrictions rested on the premise that EVERYONE should be considered a potential public health threat. The lie of "asymptomatic transmission" was the justification for that false view.

Gringo's avatar

If you knew the history of Medicine and health care here in the U.S., you would take control of your own health. The medical malfeasance of big pHarma and the way doctors and nurses care for their patients need improvement. It's no longer about mandates for injections here in the State of Florida where we have freedom of choice. Time has proven it was a disaster of the mRNA bioweapons shots and the Health Industry as a whole you cannot trust!

https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/florida-ends-several-mandatory-vaccinations-plans-to-eliminate-all/

Letsrock's avatar

"A disaster of the mRNA bioweapons shots"? No, it was CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY that no one has been held accountable for thus far.

TeeJae's avatar

I really hope Florida can be a beacon for all the other states.

Sonia Nordenson's avatar

"Big pHarma"—that's good.

Kathy Boston's avatar

Ralph BARIC was making Covid dangerous to human lung tissue at the university of North Carolina in 2015. Obama put a moratorium in place so they sent the research to Wuhan through Fauci /NIH funding. Peter DASZAK of Eco Health Alliance was involved.

Remdesivir was the Hospital’s choice of drug for Covid and had a 53% kill rate in trials.

The Covid vaccine has killed more Americans than WW1, WW2 and Vietnam combined. Yet the government has never addressed it .. some states are still pushing it. Why?

David Williams's avatar

If I was forced to take the vaccine I would be forced to inject a piece of lead into whoever’s head. And no I didn’t get the vaccine because Covid was nothing more than the flu. I am 66 years old and over weight and I have emphysema and I had Covid three times the first time was like the flu the second time was like a cold and the third time it was the runny nose. My body built up an immunity to Covid. The vaccine was not necessary and I don’t think it was developed for Covid I really think it was population control just like Bill Gates said he wanted to do. Dr. Fauci is a lying piece of crap that should be held accountable for what he created.

truth seeker's avatar

Sort of. Covidiocy was the epidemic. Your body did not build up immunity to a fiction.

Your body was relatively efficient at detoxifying whatever the bio-weapon was...

John Day MD's avatar

Thank you John, "no fundamental right to refusea vaccine" is balanced by the anti-particle of "no fundamental right to impose vaccination", which is conveniently ignored.

The Jacobson ruling was limited and "covered only the present case", due to the requirement for strict review and weighing of facts in all such cases, every-single-time.

"Vermont and Maine (and SCOTUS, which declined to hear the Politellas’ Petition for Writ of Certiorari) relied on case law concerning a completely different vaccine to support an errant interpretation that shields Big Pharma from legal scrutiny of its clearly deficient mRNA interventions."

Indeed, the word is not the thing, in the case of the "completely different vaccine", which never met any traditional definition of "vaccine", but was properly an "experimental gene therapy, with emergency use authorization".

The holding hands on ears and shouting "No, No, No, I can't hear you" about the side effects, excess deaths, and reversal of temporary mild benefit window into increased vulnerability after 6 months all need to be rigorously and openly studied in the public record.

;-(

Valerie Grimes, Hypnotist's avatar

Thank you for writing about this.

Jenny M Burrill's avatar

So good to put a face on Henning Jacobson!! And a handsome one at that. Another brave freedom fighter.

bats3697's avatar

wtfu everyone ..NO vacine is any good ..its all bullshit to make u sick or make u die

Sonia Nordenson's avatar

I'm not qualified to agree with you, but I do.

truth seeker's avatar

You are qualified. Your intuition said no. You listened.

Of course there are details...

TeeJae's avatar

Anyone know if those families are suing those who (criminally) assaulted and battered those poor children? If they haven't, I wonder why not.

Coco's avatar

I wish we could force people to read this Substack like some people want forced vaccinations!

Fred Kittelmann's avatar

Point taken, but we should not remotely be content with a proper reading of the Jacobson decision. That's still disgusting. I guess we need a constitutional amendment.

By the way, if you believe the smallpox vaccine to be safe, you may want to re-examine that.