7 Comments
User's avatar
Lindsey Smith Taillie, PhD's avatar

As a parent, I’m thrilled about the sunscreen. As a nutrition scientist, I’m thrilled physicians will get more nutrition education. I hope that next month this report can include a strong science-based definition of ultraprocessed food!

bwap9719's avatar

Save our children from government food (and ed tech) abuse

diana's avatar

No Like. Not worthy of it. Lead into a story about US-grown cotton telling us the USDA released a new label for it ... and all you show is something that says 100% Cotton? Not US-grown? Not "US" anything? If THAT is the actual label, it is most certainly not noteworthy. Neither is the USDA's pretend-effort to support US farmers and the natural-fibers industry: lipservice serves those already in power, and it isn't cotton farmers.

Sadly there isn't much else here that is noteworthy. Or read-worthy. OK, medical schools are going to teach nutrition -- which version? The Carnivore or the Vegan version? The low-fat one whose mantra got us into this mess? The USDA one where glyphosate is godly and canola oil is healthy? Now, it's fine if the stories just touch on topics IF there are links or at least attempts to guide the reader toward something substantive. I support legitimate MAHA. I'm disappointed here.

Fred Kittelmann's avatar

I can't get excited about the nutrition education in med schools. It's likely to be the same corrupt b.s. as the rest of the curriculum.

The Scam Doctor's avatar

The irony of RFK Jr protecting elders against scams while lying to parents about the results of vaccine studies to scam parents into supporting Children's Health Defense. Here's proof of one of RFK's lies:

https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/how-to-cherry-pick-data-to-scam-people?r=6hgshq