19 Comments
User's avatar
Nicole Parish's avatar

This is the end of MAHA. We learned in COVID that the gov. could and would track individuals and limit their ability to leave their home (travel), work, live. Do NOT give them more data. This is SO dangerous and another mechanism for surveillance.

Mark Brody's avatar

No thanks. Just one more device subject to hacking.

Michelle Rabin Ph. D.'s avatar

Perhaps we need to have a conversation about the harm of EMF from wearables. To pretend that’s not an issue is dangerously misleading!!!

Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

Love the comments speaking out against wearables.

Just to call this out, not only are wearables more data, but they may also have negative harmful effects as who knows what having all that technology on your body does eg EMFs)

More data doesn’t always mean better health outcomes:

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-trump-and-rfk-are-advancing-transhumanism

Malika's avatar
2hEdited

This can all be co-opted by surveillance/over-seers. Consider the long game before using these products. It is a slippery slope from 'wearables' to 'inside-ables.'

James Corbett of the Corbett Report talked about the flashing warning sign that is 'wearables' over 5 years ago. This is not the way forward.

Lori's avatar

It is wearable surveillance that will be used against the wearer one day sooner than we think. No thanks. Stick those devices ever so kindly up Mr. Whitakers, well you know. Get your profit elsewhere bc we are not buying it.

Debbie's avatar

May one day be connected to AI? Are you kidding me? All of your records have been tracked by the liberal Woods Foundation since the EMR went in line. There is no such thing as HIPPA. It's all a lie! Anyone can hack your info let alone nonmedical people looking at your info now. And what normal person knows what a fib is or how to interpret all these findings? Track and trace folks!

Genevieve's avatar

Weston A. Price warns us exposure to EMFs as well

Sounds Like Nonsense's avatar

IMMUNOLOGIST TETYANA OBUKHANYCH PhD

"Right now there is a push for wearing "wearables" being done by the HHS (MAHA) for the purposes of health monitoring. These devices work on bluetooth.

Below is a study showing the impact of prolonged bluetooth use on thyroid."

"Our study highlighted a significant impact relationship between prolonged Bluetooth headset use and increased thyroid nodule risk, emphasizing the importance of considering health impacts in the use of modern technology, especially for devices like Bluetooth headsets that are frequently used daily."

"The findings suggest that besides age, a known factor, prolonged and frequent use of Bluetooth headphones may be associated with an increased risk of developing thyroid nodules, potentially linked to the cumulative effects of NIR emitted by the headphones on the thyroid gland. Moreover, this study underscores the necessity of giving special attention to thyroid health while assessing the health risks of modern wireless technologies."

Epidemiological exploration of the impact of bluetooth headset usage on thyroid nodules using Shapley additive explanations method

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-63653-0

LOULOU's avatar

For sure for each individual a cost benefit analysis needs to happen for each individual person. These wearables are not all positive.

Lynn Murdock's avatar

This is the first article from MAHA that I disagree with and am disappointed that they would push this crap. We don’t need another way to get EMF’s into us

Nor do we need another device to be connected to and obsessed with

No thanks

Lala sparkle Shine's avatar

Wearables are not very “MAHA” as they invade privacy by sharing your personal information with private data sharing companies. Also, they contain RF and they cam cause problems on their own physically.

L.E. Nápoles's avatar

“The regulatory landscape for wearables is complex and evolving, with different rules applying to different types of devices and their intended uses” -- what could go wrong??!! - https://thinkthroughit.substack.com/p/over-reliance

Kyle Young's avatar

If you want more data centers, if you want more consolidation of power and control by the elite, if you want big brother to track and trace your every move, if you want to be exposed to harmful EMF's 24/7, if you want potentially harmful signals sent to your body by hackers, by all means, wear this technology..

"The highest expression of life is biological, not technological." Dr. Zack Bush

https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-conflict-technology

Vinu Arumugham #MAHA's avatar

The comments make it clear that the MAHA Report is out of touch with the MAHA base.

The Means (siblings) justify these ends?

Vinu Arumugham #MAHA's avatar

Wrong. They are making them sicker with radiation.

Debre Kramer's avatar

How much radiation is emitted by these "health devices"? Ear buds emit radition causing glioplastimas of the brain in the area of the ear.

Our cell phones and towers, our electric lines emit radiation. Cell phones, when first advertised used to include make and model as well as how much radiation was emitted. When did those charts disappear? In the very least, please alter wrists throughout the day? Recharge at night away from sleep area. Routers computers and phones should never be in sleep areas. Our cells were not created to deal with EMT or RF.