It's time to offer citizens a path to becoming farmers and trades people. For decades told all children to go to college and learn to code. We stopped teaching agriculture in schools. We stopped teaching the trades in schools. And now we import Indians and muslims by the thousands to replace citizens to write code and be our doctors and nurses. There are hundreds of thousands of citizens below 40 years old without the skills to do any work with their hands.
The CDC continues to recommend the Covid "vaccine". The "vaccines" are all under the protection of the PREP Act EUA that is in effect until 2029. The EUA allows the manufacturer to make these products with no requirement to test for effectiveness nor safety. None of these vaccines have been tested.
All the rest is noise.
The HHS can, with the stroke of a pen, revoke the Covid EUA. There is NO EMERGENCY, never was. This would remove the legal protection for all damage that continues to be caused by these "vaccines".
Biden extended it to 2029. Kennedy made the recommendation to end the EUA protections by June 29, 2027, but this is subject to the manufacturers appellate process. Time will tell. I'm sure the FDA will rubber stamp approval. Its already on the childhood recommended list so it will still be protected from liability by law, because its on that list.
On August 27, 2025, FDA revoked the Emergency Use Authorizations for the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Novavax COVID-19 vaccines.
The revocation was published in the Federal Register on October 2, 2025.
Legal basis: section 564(g)(2)(C) of the FD&C Act — "circumstances make such revocation appropriate to protect the public health or safety."
FDA's stated rationale: approved (BLA) versions now exist for the relevant age groups, and population immunity has reduced severe outcomes.
2. The declaration for drugs and biologics — terminating June 29, 2027
On June 29, 2026, the HHS Secretary determined that circumstances no longer justify emergency use of COVID-19 drugs and biological products.
That terminates the underlying declaration — the legal foundation EUAs sit on — effective June 29, 2027.
On that date, remaining COVID-19 EUAs listed on FDA's drug page (e.g., Paxlovid, Pemgarda, Lagevrio) stop being in effect.
Separate track: COVID-19 device EUAs terminate December 26, 2026.
⚖️ So What's the Correct Answer?
Were the vaccine EUAs "repealed"?
Revoked — yes, August 27, 2025
Effective July 2027?
No — that's the drug/biologic declaration termination, June 29, 2027
Anything effective in 2027?
Yes — June 29, 2027 (drugs/biologics), Dec 26, 2026 (devices)
The vaccine EUAs ended in 2025, not 2027. The 2027 date belongs to the broader declaration covering remaining therapeutics.
🔍 The Detail Worth Noting
Look at the revocation letter language carefully. FDA explicitly states: "While safety concerns are not the basis for our decision to revoke the EUA..."
That's a telling construction. The agency revoked authorizations that had been in place since December 2020, and went out of its way to preempt the obvious reading — that five years of accumulated safety signal data had anything to do with it. The stated reason is bureaucratic substitution: an approved product now exists, so the emergency pathway is no longer needed. That may be technically accurate under the statute. It also means the revocation tells you nothing about whether the products were safe — the agency made sure of that.
Similarly, the June 2026 declaration termination is framed around "decreasing reliance" and the existence of approved alternatives. No safety assessment, no retrospective on the emergency period. Just a paperwork transition with a 12-month runway for sponsors to pursue traditional approval.
Whether you find that reassuring or evasive depends on what you think the revocation should have said."
“We are investing real dollars to rebuild the Great American Beef Herd, giving producers the risk management tools they need..." -- If this includes killing majestic wolves or other wildlife, it should NOT be supported! There are other, more humane ways to reduce these "threats" to cattle.
I agree , Those prices are certainly out of reach for a lot of folks. How do you fix the systematizing of error? Where the only way to eat is to poison yourself.
Certainly not through the corporate capture that’s happening at the Maha conference this week
I’m interested in an aspect MAHA isn’t covering which is humane farming. They never mention the animals as anything but products. Do the regenerative farmers practice humane farming ? Maybe we should focus on healthy meals with more vegetables grains and fruits and less meat. As long as cruel and inhumane factory farming goes on I don’t care expect the nation to be blessed by God who created all animals as well as humans.
Maybe I'm old school but when I was inspired by a famine in Ethiopia (1980?) to help feed the world and went on to study ag in college as a kid from the suburbs, good old fashioned hard work - doing the scut work of cleaning out poultry houses in southern NH, long hours helping dairy farmers by putting up fencing and cleaning barns, etc - was par for the course. That turned into years and then decades of physical, calorie burning labor.
Frankly, there's not enough of that in the homegrown US pipeline. So no matter how many cool programs there are to get people incentivized (by money), there needs to be a revival of a work ethic ... and with all the gadgets and goals of shortened work weeks and expected vacation time, there's less and less new blood coming into ag when there should be. No answers here, sorry. I'll keep putting in my 12+ hour days and enjoy the farm life I've been part of a long time now.
If you care about ending federally funded experiments on dogs and cats, contact your U.S. (federal) Representative and ask them to cosponsor the COMPACT Act (H.R. 10522).
There is also legislation addressing dogs specifically bred for research — the PUPPS Act (H.R. 10523). Ask your U.S. (federal) Representative to consider cosponsoring that bill as well.
Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine talks about alternative methods of testing. Please share it with your representative
Crony corporatism is driving beef prices through the roof.
https://amac.us/newsline/crony-corporatism-is-driving-beef-prices-through-the-roof
Fifteen dollar per pound ground beef from Ben Simmons, Will Harris and Joel Salatin (apprentice labor) seems very helpful and practical.
It's time to offer citizens a path to becoming farmers and trades people. For decades told all children to go to college and learn to code. We stopped teaching agriculture in schools. We stopped teaching the trades in schools. And now we import Indians and muslims by the thousands to replace citizens to write code and be our doctors and nurses. There are hundreds of thousands of citizens below 40 years old without the skills to do any work with their hands.
mikeroweworks.org
The CDC continues to recommend the Covid "vaccine". The "vaccines" are all under the protection of the PREP Act EUA that is in effect until 2029. The EUA allows the manufacturer to make these products with no requirement to test for effectiveness nor safety. None of these vaccines have been tested.
All the rest is noise.
The HHS can, with the stroke of a pen, revoke the Covid EUA. There is NO EMERGENCY, never was. This would remove the legal protection for all damage that continues to be caused by these "vaccines".
The depopulation agenda is still alive and well.
i read somewhere (perhaps another MAHA Report article) that the EUA ends in July of next year.
Biden extended it to 2029. Kennedy made the recommendation to end the EUA protections by June 29, 2027, but this is subject to the manufacturers appellate process. Time will tell. I'm sure the FDA will rubber stamp approval. Its already on the childhood recommended list so it will still be protected from liability by law, because its on that list.
Here's what AI says about it:
"Two Separate Things Got Wrapped Up Together
1. The vaccine EUAs — revoked in 2025
On August 27, 2025, FDA revoked the Emergency Use Authorizations for the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Novavax COVID-19 vaccines.
The revocation was published in the Federal Register on October 2, 2025.
Legal basis: section 564(g)(2)(C) of the FD&C Act — "circumstances make such revocation appropriate to protect the public health or safety."
FDA's stated rationale: approved (BLA) versions now exist for the relevant age groups, and population immunity has reduced severe outcomes.
2. The declaration for drugs and biologics — terminating June 29, 2027
On June 29, 2026, the HHS Secretary determined that circumstances no longer justify emergency use of COVID-19 drugs and biological products.
That terminates the underlying declaration — the legal foundation EUAs sit on — effective June 29, 2027.
On that date, remaining COVID-19 EUAs listed on FDA's drug page (e.g., Paxlovid, Pemgarda, Lagevrio) stop being in effect.
Separate track: COVID-19 device EUAs terminate December 26, 2026.
⚖️ So What's the Correct Answer?
Were the vaccine EUAs "repealed"?
Revoked — yes, August 27, 2025
Effective July 2027?
No — that's the drug/biologic declaration termination, June 29, 2027
Anything effective in 2027?
Yes — June 29, 2027 (drugs/biologics), Dec 26, 2026 (devices)
The vaccine EUAs ended in 2025, not 2027. The 2027 date belongs to the broader declaration covering remaining therapeutics.
🔍 The Detail Worth Noting
Look at the revocation letter language carefully. FDA explicitly states: "While safety concerns are not the basis for our decision to revoke the EUA..."
That's a telling construction. The agency revoked authorizations that had been in place since December 2020, and went out of its way to preempt the obvious reading — that five years of accumulated safety signal data had anything to do with it. The stated reason is bureaucratic substitution: an approved product now exists, so the emergency pathway is no longer needed. That may be technically accurate under the statute. It also means the revocation tells you nothing about whether the products were safe — the agency made sure of that.
Similarly, the June 2026 declaration termination is framed around "decreasing reliance" and the existence of approved alternatives. No safety assessment, no retrospective on the emergency period. Just a paperwork transition with a 12-month runway for sponsors to pursue traditional approval.
Whether you find that reassuring or evasive depends on what you think the revocation should have said."
“We are investing real dollars to rebuild the Great American Beef Herd, giving producers the risk management tools they need..." -- If this includes killing majestic wolves or other wildlife, it should NOT be supported! There are other, more humane ways to reduce these "threats" to cattle.
I agree , Those prices are certainly out of reach for a lot of folks. How do you fix the systematizing of error? Where the only way to eat is to poison yourself.
Certainly not through the corporate capture that’s happening at the Maha conference this week
Let’s all pray these ideas can save the Farmers before it’s too late. 🙏🙏
I’m interested in an aspect MAHA isn’t covering which is humane farming. They never mention the animals as anything but products. Do the regenerative farmers practice humane farming ? Maybe we should focus on healthy meals with more vegetables grains and fruits and less meat. As long as cruel and inhumane factory farming goes on I don’t care expect the nation to be blessed by God who created all animals as well as humans.
Maybe I'm old school but when I was inspired by a famine in Ethiopia (1980?) to help feed the world and went on to study ag in college as a kid from the suburbs, good old fashioned hard work - doing the scut work of cleaning out poultry houses in southern NH, long hours helping dairy farmers by putting up fencing and cleaning barns, etc - was par for the course. That turned into years and then decades of physical, calorie burning labor.
Frankly, there's not enough of that in the homegrown US pipeline. So no matter how many cool programs there are to get people incentivized (by money), there needs to be a revival of a work ethic ... and with all the gadgets and goals of shortened work weeks and expected vacation time, there's less and less new blood coming into ag when there should be. No answers here, sorry. I'll keep putting in my 12+ hour days and enjoy the farm life I've been part of a long time now.
Consider your ways…
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-capture-of-maha?r=qup9v&utm_medium=ios
If you care about ending federally funded experiments on dogs and cats, contact your U.S. (federal) Representative and ask them to cosponsor the COMPACT Act (H.R. 10522).
There is also legislation addressing dogs specifically bred for research — the PUPPS Act (H.R. 10523). Ask your U.S. (federal) Representative to consider cosponsoring that bill as well.
Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine talks about alternative methods of testing. Please share it with your representative
https://www.pcrm.org/
You can find your U.S. representative (member of Congress) by http://www.house.gov/the-house-explained Or ask ChatGPT
If you call and leave a message leave your address so that they know you are a constituent and that your request counts.
The meat industry is extremely cruel to animals.