So sad to see the socialist echo chamber here looking to discredit this man with their usual lies.
I've been reading Tucker since the double noughts when he published at Mises. He disappeared off my radar at FEE and then popped back up when ZH started publishing his Brownstone work on the government's response to the 2019 Biolab Leak.
He has always stood for integrity, fairness, and freedom. And if I had to say anything to him, it would be "not every Libertarian lost their way during the BioLeak Response. Some of us held true, strengthened and emboldened by writers like yourself, Rothbard, Woods, Rockwell, etc."
That Response has pushed me to examine more deeply the role official narratives and propaganda play in our lives and how they can be used to enslave society. That never would have happened, Jeffrey, without you and writers like you.
Lol, my profile says what? I've never spoken to him or met him or even attended an event he was a speaker at. And then after that BS, you slide into an ad hominem attack? Oh, the Lulz.
The only people against those deconstructing propaganda are the propagandists. Thanks for outing yourself. Now we all know you're a professional liar.
Fair enough - you're an adherent, an aficionado, a fanboy - choose your own label for wanting to use government power to enforce your preferred social, cultural and political outcomes.
What was said to make you think this man is using government power to influence you? His intention appears to be an effort to get you to question the authoritarian narratives you’re fed by the government and MSM. In other more simple terms, to question motives, intentions, and information to decide if you are willing to give away your freedom to choose for yourself.
Anarcho-capitalist, lifetime John Birch Society member until he became too radical even for them - penned Ron Paul Newsletter for years until investigative reporters found his "decades worth of obsession with conspiracies, support for radical right-wing militias, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews," and same-sex anything. Also years writing for the LOS - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_the_South - and so on
"I really think the nation-state's not relevant anymore in a digital age," says Jeffrey Tucker, publisher of Laissez Faire Books and the creator and CEO of Liberty(dot)me, a "social network and online publishing platform for the liberty minded."
For nine dollars a month, participants ... access a library of libertarian classics .. classes on everything from Bitcoin to firearm safety, and more.
Good Lord. I'm a Jeffrey Tucker fan, and your title, Jeffrey Tucker, the Libertarian Who Embraced Health Freedom, gave me a scare. I thought I was about to read that he had perished. For a living profile subject, please stick to the present tense: Jeffrey Tucker, the Libertarian Who Embraces Health Freedom. Otherwise, thank you for this spotlight on a good man.
Indeed! Health Freedom, including freedom FROM Government Insurance Mafia robbery: extortion of Social Security for premiums that do not cover what is printed in their fraudulent handbook. I’m 75 and work full time to pay for my Health care: Chiropractic care is my choice of doctor. I do NO DRUGS and do not have NOR will BUY any of their diseases, sponsored by the Big Pharma Drug Cartel SickCare DEALERS! I want my premiums refunded so I can pay for drug free health care. Tried to cancel Medicare: agent agrees it is a robbery, but I cannot cancel except with another SickCare approved SCAM. I’m sick of this country: don’t get old in USA.
The Zogby poll shpwing overwhelming support for Health Freedom and opposition to Mandates must be translated to influence ALL elected offcials of the importance of truly honoring Informed Consent in vaccine choices. Unfortunately Big Pharma and its medical enablers (American Pediatrics Assn and American Medical Assn) have convinced the leadership of the Democratic Party to uniformly support their monopoly over Public health Policy. They will likely return to power on the coattails of legitimate opposition to Trumps immigration and war policies. It is vital that supporters of health freedom and vaccine choice contact these legislators to stop this restoration of the failed health policies of the past.
When you respond to a poll, do you think it’s independent of the person paying for it? Polls by their nature are intended to illicit the stance of the person conducting the poll as evidenced by their canned answer choices. Hence, I quit participation in all until recently when I learned to lie! I get a real kick out of throwing them a bone.
Polls do not inherently exist to elicit the pollster's preferred stance, although question wording and answer choices can strongly influence the responses. So polls are not necesssrily neutral instruments simply because they report numerical results.
The key distinction is between polling as a measurement technique and a particular poll as an instrument designed or framed by someone..A well-designed poll attempts to minimize such effects through neutral wording, balanced choices, randomized response order, and opportunities such as "other" or "don't know." A loaded poll can do the opposite.
High-credibility, nonpartisan polling organizations try to minimize pollster influence through neutral wording, balanced answer choices, representative sampling, weighting, and transparent methodology.
Pew, Gallup, AP-NORC and some of the university-bssed pollsters are first tier. Zogby does some credible, second-tier polling, but also a substantial amount of "commissioned polling" (hired gun). Always read the methodology statements.
I completely agree and it needs to start with Peter Alexander who is preaching the Big Pharma jargon which is completely untrue. He's starting off his new job telling lies because he doesn't know the real truth. Somebody needs to help him understand that the studies that are being done have a decided result before actually doing the study. He stated unequivocally this morning that one study of a million people said that vaccines don't cause autism. The study didn't say that and it probably said that it didn't show any cause of autism because it wasn't a study to actually prove vaccines caused autism. It was probably another study and it might have said that there was no proof because they weren't looking for proof. That's how Big Pharma always comes to the same conclusion. The studies aren't showing autism because the studies are constructed to ever find autism.
I've studied nutrition...not medicine for 65 years...and the only thing that belongs in the human bloodstream are nutrients from the right unprocessed organic foods. The wrong foods break down the body, too. Mankind from the beginning lived on natural unprocessed foods. This is what our Creator made the bloodstream for, to carry nutrients to nourish the organs, glands and cells. This creates energy and health. Any lab-created products designed for profit-seeking producers are not something that would nourish the human body. They would break down the organs, glands and cells harming the body and the brain. Hippocrates, the Father of medicine taught. Let Food be Your Medicine; and Medicine be your Food...and it along with other common sense advice produced CURES.
Exactly! Just as all the studies I studied on HRT were to determine if HRT helped protect against cardiac arrest, not whether it assisted with symptoms. ACOG is against it and its physicians must fall in line with their dictates. Now, HRT is once again becoming acceptable. It’s power corruption.
I came to say Jeffrey Tucker is not good enough because he doesn’t conform unyieldingly to my worldview, but I see most of you have beaten me to it. But I have beaten you all across the sarcasm/irony line, by not taking myself too seriously. Try it some time.
Opinion: crediting a personal profile of and individual to the Maha Report is disingenuous.
It is a terrible decision. The Report is not an entity, it has authors. Credit where its due, unless
the Report is an euphemism for an AI generated article. If that is true, the Report is in strong competition for bottom of barrel... Pay attention people.
Much too long an explanation for a comment. Read the book and you'll understand that the pharmaceutical companies are completely corrupt and that Pfizer for instance has spent 14 billion dollars on fraudulent study fines and that many of the studies done have predetermined results they want and get from the companies they pay to do the studies. Their studies are often fraudulent and they gave out a so-called vaccine on an emergency use authorization which means they were experimental and then mandated them which was illegal. Peter Alexander's position on vaccines is the legacy media's typical position but that doesn't reflect the facts which he is claiming he will do in his new position.
Jeffrey Tucker is a lighthouse in the storm!
So sad to see the socialist echo chamber here looking to discredit this man with their usual lies.
I've been reading Tucker since the double noughts when he published at Mises. He disappeared off my radar at FEE and then popped back up when ZH started publishing his Brownstone work on the government's response to the 2019 Biolab Leak.
He has always stood for integrity, fairness, and freedom. And if I had to say anything to him, it would be "not every Libertarian lost their way during the BioLeak Response. Some of us held true, strengthened and emboldened by writers like yourself, Rothbard, Woods, Rockwell, etc."
That Response has pushed me to examine more deeply the role official narratives and propaganda play in our lives and how they can be used to enslave society. That never would have happened, Jeffrey, without you and writers like you.
Your profile shows you work with or for him. No other activity, except for putinism - thus your “interest” in narratives and propa ….
Lol, my profile says what? I've never spoken to him or met him or even attended an event he was a speaker at. And then after that BS, you slide into an ad hominem attack? Oh, the Lulz.
The only people against those deconstructing propaganda are the propagandists. Thanks for outing yourself. Now we all know you're a professional liar.
Fair enough - you're an adherent, an aficionado, a fanboy - choose your own label for wanting to use government power to enforce your preferred social, cultural and political outcomes.
What was said to make you think this man is using government power to influence you? His intention appears to be an effort to get you to question the authoritarian narratives you’re fed by the government and MSM. In other more simple terms, to question motives, intentions, and information to decide if you are willing to give away your freedom to choose for yourself.
Which man?
Anarcho-capitalist, lifetime John Birch Society member until he became too radical even for them - penned Ron Paul Newsletter for years until investigative reporters found his "decades worth of obsession with conspiracies, support for radical right-wing militias, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews," and same-sex anything. Also years writing for the LOS - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_the_South - and so on
Because we all know Wikipedia is accurate!
It's a big internet, and there's plenty for you to read about him.
The founding member of League of the South whose child disavowed him years ago
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/jeffrey-tucker-monticello-fox-news
The Southern Poverty Law Center does not hold much weight with me from what I have read about it.
And for very good reason...
"I really think the nation-state's not relevant anymore in a digital age," says Jeffrey Tucker, publisher of Laissez Faire Books and the creator and CEO of Liberty(dot)me, a "social network and online publishing platform for the liberty minded."
For nine dollars a month, participants ... access a library of libertarian classics .. classes on everything from Bitcoin to firearm safety, and more.
https://reason.com/video/2014/08/22/jeffrey-tucker/
Good Lord. I'm a Jeffrey Tucker fan, and your title, Jeffrey Tucker, the Libertarian Who Embraced Health Freedom, gave me a scare. I thought I was about to read that he had perished. For a living profile subject, please stick to the present tense: Jeffrey Tucker, the Libertarian Who Embraces Health Freedom. Otherwise, thank you for this spotlight on a good man.
The chameleon, billionaire-backed blockchain and Bitcoin booster - "Government Needs a Blockchain, and a Hard Fork to Panarchia"
https://fee.org/articles/what-are-the-prospects-for-liberland/
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly8eqyj8e2o
Thank you MAHA Report for this information on Jeffrey Tucker and the Brownstone Institute. I have read many good things about the organization. .
Sonia, I feel the same way you do. I am into Health Freedom...and we are on the same team as Jeffrey Tucker.
Bright gentleman. Love to read his opeds in the Epoch Times.
Thank you for writing this. Appreciated very much.
Indeed! Health Freedom, including freedom FROM Government Insurance Mafia robbery: extortion of Social Security for premiums that do not cover what is printed in their fraudulent handbook. I’m 75 and work full time to pay for my Health care: Chiropractic care is my choice of doctor. I do NO DRUGS and do not have NOR will BUY any of their diseases, sponsored by the Big Pharma Drug Cartel SickCare DEALERS! I want my premiums refunded so I can pay for drug free health care. Tried to cancel Medicare: agent agrees it is a robbery, but I cannot cancel except with another SickCare approved SCAM. I’m sick of this country: don’t get old in USA.
The Zogby poll shpwing overwhelming support for Health Freedom and opposition to Mandates must be translated to influence ALL elected offcials of the importance of truly honoring Informed Consent in vaccine choices. Unfortunately Big Pharma and its medical enablers (American Pediatrics Assn and American Medical Assn) have convinced the leadership of the Democratic Party to uniformly support their monopoly over Public health Policy. They will likely return to power on the coattails of legitimate opposition to Trumps immigration and war policies. It is vital that supporters of health freedom and vaccine choice contact these legislators to stop this restoration of the failed health policies of the past.
Jeffrey/Brownstone paid Zogby to produce a "poll," publicized through EIN (😆). Doing that speaks volumes.
When you respond to a poll, do you think it’s independent of the person paying for it? Polls by their nature are intended to illicit the stance of the person conducting the poll as evidenced by their canned answer choices. Hence, I quit participation in all until recently when I learned to lie! I get a real kick out of throwing them a bone.
Polls do not inherently exist to elicit the pollster's preferred stance, although question wording and answer choices can strongly influence the responses. So polls are not necesssrily neutral instruments simply because they report numerical results.
The key distinction is between polling as a measurement technique and a particular poll as an instrument designed or framed by someone..A well-designed poll attempts to minimize such effects through neutral wording, balanced choices, randomized response order, and opportunities such as "other" or "don't know." A loaded poll can do the opposite.
High-credibility, nonpartisan polling organizations try to minimize pollster influence through neutral wording, balanced answer choices, representative sampling, weighting, and transparent methodology.
Pew, Gallup, AP-NORC and some of the university-bssed pollsters are first tier. Zogby does some credible, second-tier polling, but also a substantial amount of "commissioned polling" (hired gun). Always read the methodology statements.
I completely agree and it needs to start with Peter Alexander who is preaching the Big Pharma jargon which is completely untrue. He's starting off his new job telling lies because he doesn't know the real truth. Somebody needs to help him understand that the studies that are being done have a decided result before actually doing the study. He stated unequivocally this morning that one study of a million people said that vaccines don't cause autism. The study didn't say that and it probably said that it didn't show any cause of autism because it wasn't a study to actually prove vaccines caused autism. It was probably another study and it might have said that there was no proof because they weren't looking for proof. That's how Big Pharma always comes to the same conclusion. The studies aren't showing autism because the studies are constructed to ever find autism.
I've studied nutrition...not medicine for 65 years...and the only thing that belongs in the human bloodstream are nutrients from the right unprocessed organic foods. The wrong foods break down the body, too. Mankind from the beginning lived on natural unprocessed foods. This is what our Creator made the bloodstream for, to carry nutrients to nourish the organs, glands and cells. This creates energy and health. Any lab-created products designed for profit-seeking producers are not something that would nourish the human body. They would break down the organs, glands and cells harming the body and the brain. Hippocrates, the Father of medicine taught. Let Food be Your Medicine; and Medicine be your Food...and it along with other common sense advice produced CURES.
Exactly! Just as all the studies I studied on HRT were to determine if HRT helped protect against cardiac arrest, not whether it assisted with symptoms. ACOG is against it and its physicians must fall in line with their dictates. Now, HRT is once again becoming acceptable. It’s power corruption.
ACOG is not against HRT, now generally called menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). ACOG recommends individual risk-benefit assessment and shared decision-making.https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2025/11/acog-president-says-label-change-on-estrogen-will-increase-access-to-hormone-therapy
Even before the label change, they recommended MHT - https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/the-menopause-years
I came to say Jeffrey Tucker is not good enough because he doesn’t conform unyieldingly to my worldview, but I see most of you have beaten me to it. But I have beaten you all across the sarcasm/irony line, by not taking myself too seriously. Try it some time.
What's your worldview? Sudoscience and ranting about elites (on behalf of elites)?
Pseudo. The word is “Pseudoscience.” “Ranting” you have right.
That word gets my messages hidden. And the word for the sound a duck makes. Lots of words. No siht - That word too.
My geek leaked out - sudo - Linux/Unix command.
Opinion: crediting a personal profile of and individual to the Maha Report is disingenuous.
It is a terrible decision. The Report is not an entity, it has authors. Credit where its due, unless
the Report is an euphemism for an AI generated article. If that is true, the Report is in strong competition for bottom of barrel... Pay attention people.
And why is that specifically. You need to elaborate.
Much too long an explanation for a comment. Read the book and you'll understand that the pharmaceutical companies are completely corrupt and that Pfizer for instance has spent 14 billion dollars on fraudulent study fines and that many of the studies done have predetermined results they want and get from the companies they pay to do the studies. Their studies are often fraudulent and they gave out a so-called vaccine on an emergency use authorization which means they were experimental and then mandated them which was illegal. Peter Alexander's position on vaccines is the legacy media's typical position but that doesn't reflect the facts which he is claiming he will do in his new position.
Apparently you do not comprehend...
I certainly do understand.
please send me your posts. I stopped getting them for some reason