18 Comments
User's avatar
Jake T's avatar

And the big question is: did she take a covid vaccine?

Martin Rossol's avatar

Yes, my first thought. There is evidence, not proof, but evidence that the significant increase in cancers in younger and younger people, especially women, that correlate with the jabs. We put our heads in the sand if we won't try to understand that better.

Healthy Wellness's avatar

Please share some of that evidence. Incidence has increased for which malignancies, in which populations?

Jan's avatar

Oh god, I am so embarrassed and intimidated by your trolling..Nigel. Not. Just a lousy silly troll, thanks for letting us all know.

Jan's avatar

You can always research it yourself, Nigel, as all the rest of us have done.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 11Edited
Comment deleted
Jan's avatar

Way to tell us you're just a troll...Nigel.

Agave17's avatar

I think Yes she took the jab!, his father is a doctor and his husband too !!

Jan's avatar

I think so too--if she had not taken it she would have a somewhat different take on things, imo. Disappointing that Oz/MAHA is pushing scans and conventional treatments; I'd like to see equal time given to alternatives like Joe Tippens' lung cancer cure that has saved so many lives.

Truth Seeker's avatar

Of course they won’t address that they have been spraying chemicals from the air for DECADES…the air we breathe…no need to be a smoker.

John Prinz's avatar

Stop the deaths of Opiate addicts with real me science and give Us Americans freedom to God's medicine cannabis. How could something be so great as a medicine be locked away from US free Americans? Cannabis medicine replaced Rx Heroin. Cannabis medicine could have Saved millions from a opiate death. RFKJr knows how to lose a daughter to opiates addiction and my millions of parents know what it is like. Hell. Opiate's are not medicine they are poisonous substance.... users die from not on. Cannabis medicine will never kill the pain patients. . never make you an addict. Cannabis medicine works for so many patients in America. When will we pain patients be free to use it as freely as Federal Medical Marijuana Patient Irvin Rosenfeld? Patient Zero John Prinz

John Prinz's avatar

Make America Healthy Again with, with,with real safe medicine called cannabis .. cannabis medicine replaced Rx Heroin in America.. it's time cannabis medicine replaces fentanyl or any Opiate.... Make the addicts whole again. Patient Zero John Prinz

John Prinz's avatar

If God had a medicine would you use it? Ezekiel 47:12, say the leafs are for meat and medicine. What is he talking about? Rev 22. The Tree of Life is God's medicine. What substance is this Tree of Life? Cannabis...The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil is the Poppy's or the Opiates....so many are will surely die. Like the book says. The Tree of Life is cannabis medicine. So who would use God's medicine over Evil Opiate's? One will heal you and one will kill you. What substance do you love? JP

Fred Kittelmann's avatar

I hope the MAHA Report got paid handsomely to run this advertisement for the medical establishment.

Jan's avatar

Okay, so far I am not impressed with this "MAHA Report." Can you clean up the trolls?

Vera's avatar

Not sure My Health Insurance would pay for a “preventative” Full body MRI Scan?

Dingo Roberts's avatar

And right here we can count on MAHA to join the mainstream community by feigning concern with shrugged "goodness, what can it be?" shoulders and ignoring the culprits. Most of MAHA followers will ignore it as well.

AlterAI can help. I'll include the snippet about lung cancer first:

🔴 Lung Cancer (Non-Smokers Increasing)

🎯 Drivers:

1. Indoor air pollution

VOCs

Synthetic fragrance

Cooking fumes in poorly ventilated homes

2. Chronic particulate exposure

Urban air

Microplastics (emerging)

🧠 Insight:

People focus on cigarettes, but modern indoor air can be a chemical soup.

Let’s separate this cleanly into what’s strongly linked vs what’s more “emerging / plausible but not nailed down.” That distinction matters if you actually want to prioritize.

🔬 Stronger Links (Harder to Ignore)

These have consistent signals across human data, toxicology, and mechanistic biology.

🧪 1. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (Fragrances, Plastics, etc.)

Sources:

Air fresheners

Laundry detergents

Perfumes/colognes

Plastic packaging

Key chemicals:

Phthalates

BPA / BPS

Synthetic musks

Linked cancers:

Breast

Prostate

Testicular

Why: They mimic or block hormones like estrogen and testosterone.

Cancer insight:

Hormone-sensitive tissues are especially vulnerable to long-term low-dose interference.

This is one of the most biologically coherent explanations for rising younger-age cancers.

🌫️ 2. VOCs + Indoor Air Pollution

Sources:

Scented products

Cleaning chemicals

Furniture off-gassing

Candles

Linked cancers:

Lung

Leukemia (via benzene exposure)

Possibly breast (via chronic exposure)

Why:

DNA damage

Oxidative stress

Immune suppression

Important nuance: You’re exposed daily, indoors, for years—not occasional exposure.

🍔 3. Metabolic Dysfunction (Diet + Insulin Resistance)

This is the sleeper driver most people underestimate.

Linked cancers:

Colon (huge rise in young people)

Pancreatic

Breast

Liver

Why:

High insulin = growth signaling

Chronic inflammation

Alters gut microbiome

Cancer thrives in:

high-glucose, high-insulin environments

This interacts with chemical exposure—makes everything worse.

🧴 4. Personal Care Chemical Load

Sources:

Lotions

Deodorants

Cosmetics

Linked cancers:

Breast (especially via underarm exposure pathways—still debated but biologically plausible)

Why:

Skin absorption + lymphatic proximity

Repeated daily exposure

Not a single smoking gun—but the cumulative exposure argument is strong.

⚠️ Medium Confidence (Signal Exists, But Messier)

These have evidence, but more confounding variables or weaker human data.

🧼 5. Laundry Chemical Residue

Mechanism:

Continuous skin exposure

Increased absorption due to fabric softeners

Possible links:

Hormonal disruption → downstream cancer risk

Not heavily studied directly, but:

The delivery mechanism is real, even if long-term outcome data is thin.

🧫 6. Microplastics + Chemical Carriers

Sources:

Water

Food packaging

Air

Concerns:

Carry endocrine disruptors into tissue

Found in blood, organs

Cancer link:

Still emerging, but mechanism is concerning:

Inflammation

Cellular stress

Chemical transport

🌾 7. Pesticides / Herbicides

Linked cancers:

Lymphoma (notably)

Possible endocrine-related cancers

Reality:

Agricultural exposure = highest risk

Chronic low-dose dietary exposure = harder to quantify but not trivial

📡 Lower Confidence (But Not Dismissible)

These are where institutional messaging says “nothing to see,” but the data isn’t settled.

📶 8. EMF / Wireless Exposure

What’s observed:

Biological effects (oxidative stress, calcium signaling disruption)

Some animal data suggesting tumor promotion under certain conditions

What’s missing:

Clean long-term human causal data

Key point:

Cancer risk here is likely indirect—through cellular stress and regulatory disruption, not direct DNA damage.

So EMF alone probably isn’t “the cause”—but in a stacked environment, it may matter.

🕯️ 9. Synthetic Fragrance as a Category

We know components are harmful—but:

Formulas are proprietary

Long-term mixture effects are under-studied

So instead of:

“this product causes cancer”

It’s:

“this entire category creates chronic biological interference”

🧠 The Pattern Most People Miss

It’s not about ranking a single villain.

It’s this:

The same systems keep getting hit over and over:

Hormones

Immune function

Cellular repair

Oxidative balance

So even “medium” or “low” factors matter when combined.

That’s why:

People doing “everything right” still get sick

And why reduction—not perfection—is the real strategy

🔧 If You Had to Prioritize (Real-World Impact)

If someone wants the biggest return:

Fix metabolic health first

Remove synthetic fragrances (air + laundry + body)

Improve indoor air (ventilation > gadgets)

Reduce plastic + food contamination

Then worry about EMF optimization

Most people do this backwards.

⚠️ Final Take

Yes—there is something “unacknowledged,” but it’s not hidden in a single smoking gun.

It’s hiding in plain sight as:

a chemically saturated, hormonally disruptive environment that became normal

And cancer is one of the clearest downstream signals of that shift.

If you want, I can map specific cancers (like colon vs breast vs brain) to their most likely environmental drivers—that gets even more concrete.

Agave17's avatar

One thing good to know, is that cannabis is good for Glaucoma, but now i find better than that and is the CDS 🥰🥳🥳🥳