Shira Boehler's new book is part memoir, part manifesto. A nonsmoker diagnosed at 43, she makes the case for expanded lung cancer screening before symptoms ever appear.
On April 23, 2025, nurses administered flu, hepatitis A, and DTaP vaccines to 18-month-old twins. Within hours, they became lethargic and ill. By the next morning, their lips were blue, and they could barely move. Their mother, Anna, rushed them to the emergency room, telling the doctor about the three vaccines they’d received the day before. Capricorn shows the established power center, with its labyrinthine conventions and Plutonian struggles; in Aquarius all of this is up for review, though it is no less Plutonian. Power dynamics are questioned: any hierarchy or paradigmatic set of conventions will tend to favor one group or another. There are always insiders and outsiders, rules that work for one group may appear oppressive and stifling to another. Aquarius is an Air sign, it is social, so we have ritualized expositions and examinations of the workings of power here. On the 1st day of Aquarius season, and State of the Union addresses generally happen in this sign.
The hospital discharged them after the toddlers ate popsicles without vomiting. Their symptoms - diarrhea, vomiting, hyperprofundemia, rebound mustique continued. On May 1, 2025, the twins were found dead in a shared bed in their family’s trailer.
It was the spike glycoprotein - that spiky demon they never showed you in the glossy ads. This wasn’t just a harmless part of the virus; it’s the wrecking ball. It makes your red blood cells clump together like wet sand, choking off oxygen at the tiniest level in your body. You can’t heal what you’re forbidden to name. And that’s exactly why naming it, and using the targeted, suppressed treatments that actually work
This young woman is fortunate that they found and removed her lung cancer. But the other side of cancer screening is overtreatment.
Peter Attia (Does anybody pay attention to him anymore after the Epstein revelations?) and his wife get a lung cancer screening every year. Does that make sense for most never smokers?
The authors of this study argue that cancer screening in non-smokers (screening which is very common in East Asia) does not make sense:
Cancer screening can save lives but false positives and questionable results can also turn healthy people into people who are suddenly forced into treatment by the medical establishment, treatment which may do them no good and in fact may do them harm.
MAHA needs to explain the advantages and disadvantages of screening for cancers so that people have the knowledge to decide for themselves about screenings. Promoting cancer screenings without caveats is going along with what the medical industry wants, but not always what people need.
Medical tests are not free either. Americans already spend a lot of money on medical care of all kinds with poorer results than many other countries.
MAHA doesn't do (or consume) sensible analyses. Boehler is fortunate because she's wealthy and connected enough to have waltzed in for multiple advanced imaging studies - Couldn't have anything to do with her husband's VC owning lots of radiology facilities.
Where's the maha-world outrage about "Big Radiology" pushing population-wide full body imaging studies? What about Casey Means pushing her company's continuous glucose monitoring for everyone?
Drop the republican agenda... They don't care about MAHA...
Bingo! Then drop the "maha agenda," which is just whatever power-hungry, shape-shifting Bobby happens to be obsessed with.
On April 23, 2025, nurses administered flu, hepatitis A, and DTaP vaccines to 18-month-old twins. Within hours, they became lethargic and ill. By the next morning, their lips were blue, and they could barely move. Their mother, Anna, rushed them to the emergency room, telling the doctor about the three vaccines they’d received the day before. Capricorn shows the established power center, with its labyrinthine conventions and Plutonian struggles; in Aquarius all of this is up for review, though it is no less Plutonian. Power dynamics are questioned: any hierarchy or paradigmatic set of conventions will tend to favor one group or another. There are always insiders and outsiders, rules that work for one group may appear oppressive and stifling to another. Aquarius is an Air sign, it is social, so we have ritualized expositions and examinations of the workings of power here. On the 1st day of Aquarius season, and State of the Union addresses generally happen in this sign.
The hospital discharged them after the toddlers ate popsicles without vomiting. Their symptoms - diarrhea, vomiting, hyperprofundemia, rebound mustique continued. On May 1, 2025, the twins were found dead in a shared bed in their family’s trailer.
It was the spike glycoprotein - that spiky demon they never showed you in the glossy ads. This wasn’t just a harmless part of the virus; it’s the wrecking ball. It makes your red blood cells clump together like wet sand, choking off oxygen at the tiniest level in your body. You can’t heal what you’re forbidden to name. And that’s exactly why naming it, and using the targeted, suppressed treatments that actually work
This young woman is fortunate that they found and removed her lung cancer. But the other side of cancer screening is overtreatment.
Peter Attia (Does anybody pay attention to him anymore after the Epstein revelations?) and his wife get a lung cancer screening every year. Does that make sense for most never smokers?
The authors of this study argue that cancer screening in non-smokers (screening which is very common in East Asia) does not make sense:
https://www.bmj.com/content/388/bmj-2024-081674
Cancer screening can save lives but false positives and questionable results can also turn healthy people into people who are suddenly forced into treatment by the medical establishment, treatment which may do them no good and in fact may do them harm.
MAHA needs to explain the advantages and disadvantages of screening for cancers so that people have the knowledge to decide for themselves about screenings. Promoting cancer screenings without caveats is going along with what the medical industry wants, but not always what people need.
Medical tests are not free either. Americans already spend a lot of money on medical care of all kinds with poorer results than many other countries.
MAHA doesn't do (or consume) sensible analyses. Boehler is fortunate because she's wealthy and connected enough to have waltzed in for multiple advanced imaging studies - Couldn't have anything to do with her husband's VC owning lots of radiology facilities.
Where's the maha-world outrage about "Big Radiology" pushing population-wide full body imaging studies? What about Casey Means pushing her company's continuous glucose monitoring for everyone?
American College of Radiology loves this story;
https://www.acr.org/News-and-Publications/Media-Center/2026/acr-foundation-launches-cancer-doesnt-care-fund
You hate on the pediatricians, but not the MUCH better compensated and better lifestyle radiologists.
Boehler's not a retard, so assume accordingly. And you're a random Aussie "Chinese medicine" woo lady.
Certainly a possibility. My sister-in-law who never smoked died from lung cancer in 2010. But she was in her 50s.
They need to encourage prior heavy smokers to get CT scans but most of them don't.
Was she jabbed?
I'm sure. She's not a moron - just an Epstein-class maga parasite whose biotech venture capital husband keeps getting high level trump admin. jobs.