12 Comments
User's avatar
Jemelines's avatar

Very well written, thank you 🙏

Gary Freeman's avatar

Back in 2020, 21, and 22, when it started to come out about Fauci and the fake/false/biased science behind it I started to call all bad science "Fauci Science". I think it would be fitting if the name stuck and all biased, poorly research or false science was give the name of Fauci Science from this time forward. It would be fitting tribute to the man who said "I am the science". Pride goeth before the fall - and how far he has fallen. There needs to be a name applied to that type of science, and who is more fitting of that name than "America's doctor, Dr. Fauci" who lied to us and pushed his own agenda on us to our detriment and the bottom line of big pharma.

Nancy's avatar

Yes “Fauci Science” would be fitting like I’ve heard people say Frankenstein Science, Dr. Frankenstein created a monster that killed people…

Janice DiPietro's avatar

If Fauci is immune from criminal prosecution, can he still be charged and convicted and rather than prison, be required to hand over all his ill gotten assets to leave him broke? There has to be justice somehow!

Vet nor's avatar

I doubt he could be convicted but I do wonder if a CIVIL case could be brought.

I also thought, hmm, Fauci got a pardon, but what about Grady? If she was in charge of "ethics" at the NIH she did a terrible job. Did she take kickbacks? Did she know her husband was continuing gainof function research after it was supposed to be paused? Wouldn't that make her culpable?

John Wright's avatar

Enough was enough in March 2020, when it was obvious to many of us that what the public was being fed was a load of crap.

Jeff Schreiber's avatar

I once heard a wise man say that in the Age of Darkness, Common Sense becomes very uncommon. Now that we’ve all lived through it in real time, it’s also pretty clear that human intelligence is highly overrated.

Petra Bucenieks's avatar

But this hidden agenda with pushing vaccines on us, is much bigger than Fauci, than any single bad actor no matter how much of a kingpin they seem to be. Doesn't dragging any of the frontspeople through the mud, minimize the fact that to a big extent they were just following orders, perhaps even knowing they would eventually have to take the fall ?

It becomes plausible picturing this whole Big-Pharma/captured-regulatory-agency/science-fudging pattern as some super-lucrative, self-aggrandizement and wealth and power generating opportunity that inexorably draws in susceptible individuals like gambling addiction, but could this not also be the perfect smoke screen that keeps the hidden agenda safe ?

Jay's avatar

The wealthy have always been protected from being held criminally liable. As much as it pains me, Fauci won't see any jail time or anything even remotely fitting his high crimes.

The list of criminals with government positions is extensive and it appears its a providing ground for those who want to perfect their criminal activity while being paid by our tax dollars.

Accountability has left the room.

cristolf's avatar

You crack me up, rug plunder

Lysenko's avatar

Go back to your little inquisition machine.