In another week of major MAHA wins, Secretary Kennedy secured $100 million in funding for a bold new approach to addiction treatment through the STREETS Initiative, which is set to deliver life-changing recovery support for veterans and others battling opioid addiction and homelessness.
Wow--these reports are like magnets to low-frequency responses. Keep on riling and unsettling the archons, MAHA! Truth and health will ultimately prevail.
B.S. Drugs are not compassionate! The body jeals with whole food, whole-food supplements, and natural medicines. You are being swayed. Drugs are a device of Satan.
You are making the strong case for health. Many want good news about their bad habits
as John McDougall so famously used to say. The symbol caduceus for pharmacology is two serpents around a staff, lending credible evidence for your device assertion.
No ask a severely wounded soldier and the medic if they think morphine is evil, or someone who has suffered from severe depression if they or their families consider marijuana as evil, morphine for someone in hospice with unbearable pain even if they double up dosage and ends the pain a week or two early
This also brings up a preoccupation of mine whenever opiods are discussed.
OK, let's say someone starts on opiods for severe physical pain, and they get addicted. What the hell are they supposed to do afterwards for their pain? Just bear it and withdraw from the drugs? I have never had to face that dilemma, but I think I would accept the addiction, even to street drugs (heroin etc...) , instead of having to bear pain all the time. Now, taking opiods for intense psychological distress may be a whole other dilemma. But maybe not. Maybe talking it out with others may help distress. But you cannot talk out physical pain.
Any thoughts ? Especially from anyone who has faced that dilemma.
Have been in the trenches treating "pain" for decades.
Howz about identifying the source of the pain? That would
be a first step in ameliorating. Pain meds have their place, short term palliative care. A user ALWAYS pays a price. Long term use is a total disaster.
Pain in not physical, it is neurological by definition.
If long term opioid use is a total disaster, then how would you treat long term pain? Convince the person to bear it ? If you were a doctor, refuse them painkillers after a while ?
I am grateful for the states that have drafted legislation based on Dr. Sansone's "mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act" (this is referenced in the above petition)...
I have supported and made comments to "official" petitions submitted to the FDA, and also "unofficial" petitions like in the link above. There is no "begging" any "leaders" in any of the petitions that I have signed and supported.
State legislation is wonderful...if it passes...
Strong public support (from those who are not clueless) for petitions like the one linked above could act as a catalyst for additional states in drafting (and passing) that legislation...
"All have a God given Constitutional right to body autonomy." 100%
No where did I write or imply that one needs laws to grant God given rights.
I'm not sure why you are implying otherwise or asking me to "consider that."
But I will disagree again with your assertion that a petition is a form of begging. Sometimes, to actually do the right thing, politicians need the cover of strong public support which can be facilitated with petitions, whether "official" or "unofficial".
I don't quite understand what is in this package , but what I do know is that most conservatives HATE homeless people, and just want to clear them out of the way using the police. After that they don't give a fuck what happens to them.
And now they drone on about some homeless-industrial complex, stating that all the Left cares about is their own power, and using the homeless as an excuse for ideological warfare. What bullshit. It's mostly people of the Left who care for homeless people. .
This complex as described by this article: (from AI Overview)
The "homelessness industrial complex" (HIC) refers to the web of government agencies, non-profits, and private contractors that profit from or rely on managing, rather than solving, homelessness. Critics argue it creates perverse incentives to perpetuate the issue to secure funding, funding, and jobs, while favoring costly, bureaucratic, and ineffective solutions.
Here is a deeper breakdown of the concept:
Key Aspects of the Homelessness Industrial Complex
Network of Stakeholders: It involves a massive, interconnected system of non-profits, consultants, government departments, and private contractors.
Profit Incentives: The system is criticized for creating financial motives to maintain high numbers of homeless individuals to justify continued funding and contracts.
Focus on Management Over Resolution: Critics contend the system prioritizes "managing" the problem—running shelters, providing temporary services—rather than creating permanent, structural solutions.
Bureaucratic Hurdles: The system is often described as complex, requiring individuals to navigate red tape for basic help, with funds sometimes running out before services reach those in need.
Ideological Constraints: It is argued that funding constraints and specific program models (e.g., rigid "Housing First" approaches) limit innovative, local, or diverse solutions.
Common Criticisms
Perpetuating the Problem: Institutions may try to "preserve the problem to which they are the solution".
Incompetence & Waste: Despite billions spent, populations often grow, leading to accusations of ineffective spending.
Territorialism: Organizations can become competitive and siloed rather than collaborative.
The term draws parallels to the "prison-industrial complex" and the "non-profit industrial complex," suggesting that systemic forces often outweigh individual efforts to fix the problem (End of article)
Taken in the context of deliberate attacks: Train derailments, Bridge collisions, Aircraft near misses and crashes, Weather attacks Think N Carolina and LaHaina it is almost certain that
E Pallatine was no "accident"
The Medical Cartel were the delivery boys for Big P and the mRNA bioweapons.
There are over 30 MILLION dead. Excepting children they offered their arms for the
fictitious "virus". Rinse and repeat.
Below is outlined another MAHA "win" yeah??
Jon Rappoport forgot more than 10 experts remember, he reports:
Last week, I posted 5 blockbuster articles on medically caused deaths in America.
This is an issue nobody is talking about on any consistent basis.
I’m talking about it.
I’ve been on the case for at least 15 years now.
Yes, there is some debate here and there in the medical literature. One brand of statistical liar vs. another brand of statistical liar vs. another brand of incomprehensible numbers cruncher.
The result? A squalid mess, with no definitive outcome. Which is the whole point. To keep the truth in hiding.¹
The whole issue of medical murder as an ongoing high crime has itself become an op—in the sense that obscuring it and keeping it out of the news and out of the awareness of the public and out of MAHA is intentional.
Think about it. The US medical system kills more than two million people per decade…and this isn’t a news story. No government agency is doing anything to stop it. That isn’t a new story?²
I recently checked to see what happened, in US news media, right after Dr. Barbara Starfield published her landmark review of medically caused death, in the Journal of the American Association on July 26, 2000. I’ve referred to her review dozens of times in these pages. According to her figures, the medical system kills 2.25 million Americans every decade.
What I found was this: virtually no mention of Starfield’s review, at the time, in the NY Times, the Washington Post, or Time Magazine. It was as if Starfield’s staggering finding didn’t exist.
There was a news blackout across America. The reason given by some analysts who looked into this years later? Starfield’s findings were controversial. Other medical researchers thought she overstated her case and her numbers. But since when has controversy stopped the news from covering an explosive story? The news feeds off controversy. The more the better
Gee what could go wrong giving control of $100 million to the biggest con artist ever in charge of US budget not in theory but reality (Speaker Johnson holds the key but he gave tRump the spare , an ex drug addict of which only rich people can be exes, poor people are recovering addicts, and a Dr who thinks the “hypocritical” Oath is just something oath to wipe your ass on
Wow--these reports are like magnets to low-frequency responses. Keep on riling and unsettling the archons, MAHA! Truth and health will ultimately prevail.
Yay Mr. kennedy and Thank You!
B.S. Drugs are not compassionate! The body jeals with whole food, whole-food supplements, and natural medicines. You are being swayed. Drugs are a device of Satan.
You are making the strong case for health. Many want good news about their bad habits
as John McDougall so famously used to say. The symbol caduceus for pharmacology is two serpents around a staff, lending credible evidence for your device assertion.
I love that shit about "Satan". :), because I am ...Satan... anarchist branch.
Not wise to publicly declare love for shit. Better to flush it.
What ?
Most defininitely accurate with few exceptions, precious few
You were doing ok until you brought Satan on board.
If she substitued the word evil, would that in your opinion, have been accurate?
No ask a severely wounded soldier and the medic if they think morphine is evil, or someone who has suffered from severe depression if they or their families consider marijuana as evil, morphine for someone in hospice with unbearable pain even if they double up dosage and ends the pain a week or two early
why would I ask a compromised person anything?
Accurate Assessment skills for the win. What she said about Rx is
mostly true. A pharmacist is under constant pressure to
"fill" prescriptions that do a poor job of covering symptoms at best.
In that sense they are evil. Far greater than 95%
You are fishing at the bottom of the pond.
Totally right on, Tom Gruver.
This also brings up a preoccupation of mine whenever opiods are discussed.
OK, let's say someone starts on opiods for severe physical pain, and they get addicted. What the hell are they supposed to do afterwards for their pain? Just bear it and withdraw from the drugs? I have never had to face that dilemma, but I think I would accept the addiction, even to street drugs (heroin etc...) , instead of having to bear pain all the time. Now, taking opiods for intense psychological distress may be a whole other dilemma. But maybe not. Maybe talking it out with others may help distress. But you cannot talk out physical pain.
Any thoughts ? Especially from anyone who has faced that dilemma.
Have been in the trenches treating "pain" for decades.
Howz about identifying the source of the pain? That would
be a first step in ameliorating. Pain meds have their place, short term palliative care. A user ALWAYS pays a price. Long term use is a total disaster.
Pain in not physical, it is neurological by definition.
I don't quite understand what you are saying .
If long term opioid use is a total disaster, then how would you treat long term pain? Convince the person to bear it ? If you were a doctor, refuse them painkillers after a while ?
https://dutytodissent.substack.com/p/we-the-people-demand-a-moratorium
Please sign and share the petition for moratorium on the mRNA/modRNA genetic transfection technology platform:
https://www.change.org/mRNAmoratorium
4 states have now drafted legislation against any mRNA quaxcine.
Petitions beg "leaders" for rights they already have.
The vax we could get behind is the one that prevents stupid,
the true epidemic. Health does not, nor could it come from needles.
The real issue is a totally clueless public.
I am grateful for the states that have drafted legislation based on Dr. Sansone's "mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act" (this is referenced in the above petition)...
I have supported and made comments to "official" petitions submitted to the FDA, and also "unofficial" petitions like in the link above. There is no "begging" any "leaders" in any of the petitions that I have signed and supported.
State legislation is wonderful...if it passes...
Strong public support (from those who are not clueless) for petitions like the one linked above could act as a catalyst for additional states in drafting (and passing) that legislation...
Yes Kelly a petition is a form of begging or its a demand.
Regardless, all have a God given Constitutional right to body autonomy.
One does not need laws to grant what one already has.
Consider that.
"All have a God given Constitutional right to body autonomy." 100%
No where did I write or imply that one needs laws to grant God given rights.
I'm not sure why you are implying otherwise or asking me to "consider that."
But I will disagree again with your assertion that a petition is a form of begging. Sometimes, to actually do the right thing, politicians need the cover of strong public support which can be facilitated with petitions, whether "official" or "unofficial".
I don't quite understand what is in this package , but what I do know is that most conservatives HATE homeless people, and just want to clear them out of the way using the police. After that they don't give a fuck what happens to them.
And now they drone on about some homeless-industrial complex, stating that all the Left cares about is their own power, and using the homeless as an excuse for ideological warfare. What bullshit. It's mostly people of the Left who care for homeless people. .
This complex as described by this article: (from AI Overview)
The "homelessness industrial complex" (HIC) refers to the web of government agencies, non-profits, and private contractors that profit from or rely on managing, rather than solving, homelessness. Critics argue it creates perverse incentives to perpetuate the issue to secure funding, funding, and jobs, while favoring costly, bureaucratic, and ineffective solutions.
Here is a deeper breakdown of the concept:
Key Aspects of the Homelessness Industrial Complex
Network of Stakeholders: It involves a massive, interconnected system of non-profits, consultants, government departments, and private contractors.
Profit Incentives: The system is criticized for creating financial motives to maintain high numbers of homeless individuals to justify continued funding and contracts.
Focus on Management Over Resolution: Critics contend the system prioritizes "managing" the problem—running shelters, providing temporary services—rather than creating permanent, structural solutions.
Bureaucratic Hurdles: The system is often described as complex, requiring individuals to navigate red tape for basic help, with funds sometimes running out before services reach those in need.
Ideological Constraints: It is argued that funding constraints and specific program models (e.g., rigid "Housing First" approaches) limit innovative, local, or diverse solutions.
Common Criticisms
Perpetuating the Problem: Institutions may try to "preserve the problem to which they are the solution".
Incompetence & Waste: Despite billions spent, populations often grow, leading to accusations of ineffective spending.
Territorialism: Organizations can become competitive and siloed rather than collaborative.
The term draws parallels to the "prison-industrial complex" and the "non-profit industrial complex," suggesting that systemic forces often outweigh individual efforts to fix the problem (End of article)
It's all MAGA bullshit.
Taken in the context of deliberate attacks: Train derailments, Bridge collisions, Aircraft near misses and crashes, Weather attacks Think N Carolina and LaHaina it is almost certain that
E Pallatine was no "accident"
The Medical Cartel were the delivery boys for Big P and the mRNA bioweapons.
There are over 30 MILLION dead. Excepting children they offered their arms for the
fictitious "virus". Rinse and repeat.
Below is outlined another MAHA "win" yeah??
Jon Rappoport forgot more than 10 experts remember, he reports:
Last week, I posted 5 blockbuster articles on medically caused deaths in America.
This is an issue nobody is talking about on any consistent basis.
I’m talking about it.
I’ve been on the case for at least 15 years now.
Yes, there is some debate here and there in the medical literature. One brand of statistical liar vs. another brand of statistical liar vs. another brand of incomprehensible numbers cruncher.
The result? A squalid mess, with no definitive outcome. Which is the whole point. To keep the truth in hiding.¹
The whole issue of medical murder as an ongoing high crime has itself become an op—in the sense that obscuring it and keeping it out of the news and out of the awareness of the public and out of MAHA is intentional.
Think about it. The US medical system kills more than two million people per decade…and this isn’t a news story. No government agency is doing anything to stop it. That isn’t a new story?²
I recently checked to see what happened, in US news media, right after Dr. Barbara Starfield published her landmark review of medically caused death, in the Journal of the American Association on July 26, 2000. I’ve referred to her review dozens of times in these pages. According to her figures, the medical system kills 2.25 million Americans every decade.
What I found was this: virtually no mention of Starfield’s review, at the time, in the NY Times, the Washington Post, or Time Magazine. It was as if Starfield’s staggering finding didn’t exist.
There was a news blackout across America. The reason given by some analysts who looked into this years later? Starfield’s findings were controversial. Other medical researchers thought she overstated her case and her numbers. But since when has controversy stopped the news from covering an explosive story? The news feeds off controversy. The more the better
Here is a free option that I submitted months ago through Policies for the People https://forum.policiesforpeople.com/t/recover-our-nation-from-addiction-through-service/16841
Gee what could go wrong giving control of $100 million to the biggest con artist ever in charge of US budget not in theory but reality (Speaker Johnson holds the key but he gave tRump the spare , an ex drug addict of which only rich people can be exes, poor people are recovering addicts, and a Dr who thinks the “hypocritical” Oath is just something oath to wipe your ass on