The people I know who are frustrated by the glyphosate drama are not calling for a ban—for one day glyphosate to be legal, and the next for it to be illegal.
What we're advocating for is for the EPA to represent the science and to inform the public about the dangers. We want a warning label. This strategy, taken from the cigarette playbook, will raise awareness of the issue and change consumer behavior, thereby increasing demand and incentivizing conventional farmers to transition to regenerative, organic practices.
Every food product on the market would need that label. If it doesn’t come directly from spraying, it comes from infiltration into our land, water and air.
I have lived in a flight path from Logan Airport for 35 years snd have watched the con trails turn to chem trails. The spraying is constant and heartbreaking. This is the national security issue Trump should be addressing. It is pure evil.
How is giving immunity to the pesticide corporations something to offer "an off rump."? In my view, it's going backwards, making things worse than they are. I am not being divisive, I don't appreciate after all the work we have done collectively to be told that we can't question the obvious
when the administration turns healthy farming into a multi billion dollar national security issue, because it is, we may get somewhere. What more shall it take than 77% of our young unable to pass a military exam? Sadly Trump just gave a great defense to Bayer, now before the Supreme Court for an immunity deal, which is the real reason for this EO betrayal. If the court uses this bs national security shield to give Bayer immunity, it’ll be a cold day in hell before farming changes. How do I know, because it is exactly these protections that gave our children 72-94 unsafe vaccine doses. So sad!!! That doesn’t mean we give up. It means that we fight harder. It’s that important.
And now they want to build city size data centers in the Texas panhandle using up BILLIONS of gallons of water daily and displacing farmers at an alarming rate. WHERE DOES THIS MADNESS END???? WHEN THEY'VE DESTROYED ALL OF US???
They could never operate in a desert. They use up HUMONGOUS amounts of water to cool the equipment down and in the process they pollute and destroy large bodies of water. They are also taking much needed water away from farmers!!! The whole thing is one huge nightmare that must be stopped!!! HELLOOO TRUMP?!?!
Throwing more money at quick fixes while "allowing" poisonous chemicals in our food is not the answer. Make chemical companies accountable and liable, as anyone should be that produces or does something that kills or harms others AND support small organic and natural farmers who care for the food and land and are struggling in the face of big Ag. We are at a cross roads now where one can talk about becoming healthy while talking about killing with war...quite the paradox. When we love this Earth and all its incredible gifts and each other as ourselves, then maybe we will be worthy of inheriting it.
I have lived most of my adult years trying to eat organic and natural, locally produced food if we didn't get or grow it ourselves. What I expect from people in governing positions is to protect this Earth and us, we "the people", and coming generations (of all species) from harm by listening to what is needed instead of what is profitable. When we care for this planet and each other, not killing the planet and each other, prosperity and health will ensue,
The following does NOT help Kennedy's and Garry's and Klar' s cases :
Cancer claims against glyphosate should still be prosecuted !
March 3, 2026 › Agency Capture › Health Conditions › News
Trump Officials With Ties to Bayer Ask Supreme Court to Wipe Out Glyphosate Cancer Claims
The Trump administration on Monday urged the U.S. Supreme Court to side with Bayer in a case that could wipe out thousands of Roundup cancer lawsuits and billions in potential liability. It was the second time the DOJ intervened in the case, and three of nine officials who signed the brief previously worked for law firms that represented Bayer.
by U.S. Right to Know
March 3, 2026
bayer logo and cancer patient
By Stacy Malkan
The Trump administration yesterday handed Bayer another win, urging the U.S. Supreme Court in a new brief to side with the German pesticide company in a high-stakes legal case that could wipe out thousands of cancer lawsuits and potentially billions of dollars in liability tied to glyphosate-based Roundup weedkiller.
Three out of nine U.S. officials who signed the brief previously worked for law firms that have represented Bayer, raising questions about whether the Trump administration is providing special favors and benefits to Bayer and siding with a foreign corporation against Americans with cancer.
The brief is the second U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) intervention in the case. In December 2025, the DOJ asked the court to review Bayer’s case. The court accepted the case in January, and oral arguments are scheduled for April 27.
In the new filing, the DOJ and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) urged the court to rule in Bayer’s favor on the central legal issue: whether federal approval of a pesticide label under federal law preempts state failure-to-warn claims.
If the court accepts that argument, individuals would be barred from suing Bayer under state law for failing to warn that Roundup may cause cancer.
The salvo for Bayer is the latest in a series of favorable actions the Trump administration has provided to Bayer.
On Feb. 18, the White House invoked the Defense Production Act to guarantee supplies of glyphosate-based herbicides and elemental phosphorus, a raw element used in the production of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides and a wide range of industrial and military chemicals.
Regulators also reapproved dicamba, a Bayer herbicide twice blocked by federal courts, and cleared the way for new pesticides containing toxic, persistent per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) “forever” chemicals.
We reviewed the company’s ties to the Trump administration and found numerous connections between Bayer’s lobby and legal firms and senior officials in decision-making positions affecting pesticide regulations, chemical safety and how our nation’s food system is shaped. The new Supreme Court filing adds more Bayer ties.
Signers on the brief include Deputy Solicitor General Sarah M. Harris, who swung between roles at President Donald Trump’s DOJ and a law firm that represented Bayer in product liability cases.
Harris was acting solicitor general from January to April 2025. Before that, she was a partner at Williams & Connolly LLP, which represented Bayer in a nationwide class action involving allegations that Bayer’s neonicotinoid insecticides harmed honeybees.
The firm also played a role in crafting Bayer’s legal arguments for the case that is now before the Supreme Court.
On its website, the firm lists among its representation experience: “Bayer in MDL and various state coordinated proceedings (comprising over 15,000 cases total),” and said it was “asked to be co-lead trial counsel in one of the two initial bellwether cases” to be tried in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, referring to one of the early Roundup trial cases before the litigation was paused for mediation.
Recent documents show the firm still representing Monsanto (now Bayer) in Roundup litigation as of 2025.
The firm also represented Monsanto in a 2025 settlement to end claims from roughly 200 people who said they were harmed by PCB contamination at a Washington state school, and in the U.S. District Court in Delaware in a legal dispute with Corteva Agriscience over patent claims.
In 2020, Williams & Connolly represented Bayer before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in litigation arising from the Mirena intrauterine device multidistrict litigation in which thousands of plaintiffs alleged injuries from the device.
Harris worked at Williams & Connolly’s Supreme Court and Appellate practice, representing clients in appeals in the high court and federal and state appellate courts.
Prior to that role, she worked for the first Trump administration, as deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel from 2017-2020.
Assistant to the U.S. solicitor general, Aaron Z. Roper, also signed the DOJ/EPA brief for Bayer, and also worked at Williams & Connolly LLP. He was an associate at the firm’s Supreme Court and Appellate practice prior to working at the DOJ.
The brief was also signed by Robert N. Stander, deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ’s Environment and Natural Resources Division. He spent roughly a decade at Jones Day, a firm that represented Bayer in matters related to its acquisition of Monsanto.
New Book: Total Load Theory, Order Today
Total Load Theory Book
Case hinges on EPA pesticide reviews
The DOJ argues in its latest brief that the Supreme Court should rule in Bayer’s favor because federal pesticide law (FIFRA) vests the EPA with the responsibility to determine what pesticide warnings are necessary to protect human health and the environment.
If EPA deems a pesticide to be safe, that is essentially the final word about product safety; in the case of glyphosate, state law requirements to warn consumers about cancer risk “second guess the judgements of EPA,” and should not be allowed, the brief argues.
“EPA registration process hinges on a robust scientific review,” the brief claims.
But EPA pesticide approvals are laden with controversy — and the glyphosate review is a prime example.
In 2022, a federal appeals court vacated parts of the EPA’s glyphosate approval, finding the agency failed to properly consider cancer risks, among other problems. The approval is under review, but past reviews have relied heavily on industry science.
In December, the same week the DOJ filed its first brief asking the Supreme Court to take Bayer’s case — and sent Bayer’s stock soaring — an academic journal retracted a key glyphosate study that informed regulatory approvals around the world, over evidence of Monsanto ghostwriting and other serious ethics violations.
The episode highlights the stakes of maintaining meaningful, independent safety assessments for chemicals. But EPA officials last year dismantled the research office that provided the scientific underpinning for risk assessments — a change EPA employees said is likely to increase political interference in decisions about chemical safety.
Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress are attempting to gut the nation’s toxics laws in ways that would limit the science used to determine health risks and give industry even more say over the chemical assessment process.
See our recent investigation into Bayer’s ties to top officials in the Trump administration.
Our Bayer lobby tracker provides information about the 45 lobbyists registered to lobby for Bayer as of the fourth quarter of 2025, the 13 lobby firms retained by Bayer, and dozens of leadership personnel at those firms who worked for the previous or current Trump administration or Trump’s presidential campaigns.
Originally published by U.S. Right to Know.
Stacy Malkan is co-founder and managing editor at U.S. Right to Know, covering public health science and tracking industry lobbying and public relations efforts.
TWENTY years a MAHA Mom left fielding poisons and reading labels like I played professional ‘poison- ball’ and worked for the ‘label police’.
PASSION? Ridding this world of poisons that made me sick with gut issues, liver methylation issues and Hashimotos.
SIX years since the bees came to me and changed my life injecting it with pure JOY. They chose me and my girls to be their ‘Queen Voice’ for this book idea that came to me and turned into a Big Mission— The Bee LOVE Mission.🐝💖
I wrote a magical Eco -Kid Hero (Earth Guardian) Adventure with my youngest daughter who wrote the characters and dialogue at 7 yo and my oldest is an illustrator and did the art.
It’s called
THE QUEEN BEE PROPHECY
A Time Travel
Earth Guardian Mission:
Bee LOVE
It’s loaded with TRUTH of why bees are sick and dying ( GLYPHOSATE, 5G , GMOs) and BEE WISDOM and what we van DO ABOUT OT. It’s layered with hope and love and envisioning our ‘Heavenly Future.’ I gave Bobby our book. Del BT and ICAN team read it but it was not the time
I thought I was late.
I recently hit publish and the next day Glyphosate got the green light and FRANCE came our saying they were banning all bee pesticides.
We farm dryland soft white wheat in the PNW and although we don’t use glyphosate as a desiccant prior to harvest here, it has become increasingly used to prevent weeds on the fallow ground. We use regenerative farming practices, but that has increased the use of herbicides. In order to reduce tilling the fallow ground, that requires the use of herbicides. We would love to not have to use herbicides as they are so expensive. With the price of wheat as it was in the 1970’s and farming costs higher than ever, the future of farming is bleak.
Thank you for your efforts & a voice of reality. Folks seem to think we can fix decades & decades of issues overnight. Hope you are receiving any new benefits which apply to you . . . https://www.usda.gov/
The issue may mostly be a) the combination of types of chemicals and b) over use in levels not required when soils are improved. University of Rochester applied the combination of pesticides-herbacides-fungacides in feed of cows - as would be consumed by humans weight for weight -/ and the cows de eloped Parkinson within three weeks. The FDA does not test the combination of types of “ cides” … they test only one type at s time. Herein lies the problem. We have adequate technology to off ramp the combinations right now. And we needed to do all this 30 years ago while controlling electromagnetic field exposures and stemming the tick borne epidemic through honest testing and proper treatments. The result of all three areas NOT being controlled thirty years ago is the now one in five families destroyed by autism and chronic illness. Thirty years too late. You boys ain’t got time to whine. Bout off ramp technologies. Get brave.
Dr. Bhattacharya, perhaps you could look into a consultation w Dr. Ananda Shiva? She is a very well respected, no nonsense professional who has had lots of successful experience dealing w the Monsantos of the world and how to correct their destruction to our food and water. I have been following her for many years and cannot praise her enough.
Glyphosate, other herbicides, pesticides, chemical fertilizers, irrigation and diesel machinery allow the US to maintain commodity grains as a low cost global weapon, a strategic consideration since Nixon/Kissinger/Butz.
I have to agree with Adam Garrie, although I think he should be a bit more understanding and conciliatory to those who are outraged that glyphosate will still be around. I am thinking of his offensive remark at the end : " We are not interested in you " ( that is, those who disagree with Garrie, Kennedy etc..) . Reach out specially to those that have been affected by those chemicals, and I am thinking here of a person and his wife who told their story about the unhealthy effects upon them of this nasty chemical in the comments section of a previous story.
So it’s divisive to deviate from the party line that Trump is a gift to MAHA? We are told we are not here to be a voting bloc, but we should only support Trump and Republican candidates? Protecting Bayer is part of the off ramp? This is positively Orwellian.
Listen not to the naysayers, rather, use common sense and plan for a cleaner, healthier future.
This is a straw man.
The people I know who are frustrated by the glyphosate drama are not calling for a ban—for one day glyphosate to be legal, and the next for it to be illegal.
What we're advocating for is for the EPA to represent the science and to inform the public about the dangers. We want a warning label. This strategy, taken from the cigarette playbook, will raise awareness of the issue and change consumer behavior, thereby increasing demand and incentivizing conventional farmers to transition to regenerative, organic practices.
Every food product on the market would need that label. If it doesn’t come directly from spraying, it comes from infiltration into our land, water and air.
And allegedly from CHEMTRAILS!!!
I have lived in a flight path from Logan Airport for 35 years snd have watched the con trails turn to chem trails. The spraying is constant and heartbreaking. This is the national security issue Trump should be addressing. It is pure evil.
How is giving immunity to the pesticide corporations something to offer "an off rump."? In my view, it's going backwards, making things worse than they are. I am not being divisive, I don't appreciate after all the work we have done collectively to be told that we can't question the obvious
when the administration turns healthy farming into a multi billion dollar national security issue, because it is, we may get somewhere. What more shall it take than 77% of our young unable to pass a military exam? Sadly Trump just gave a great defense to Bayer, now before the Supreme Court for an immunity deal, which is the real reason for this EO betrayal. If the court uses this bs national security shield to give Bayer immunity, it’ll be a cold day in hell before farming changes. How do I know, because it is exactly these protections that gave our children 72-94 unsafe vaccine doses. So sad!!! That doesn’t mean we give up. It means that we fight harder. It’s that important.
And now they want to build city size data centers in the Texas panhandle using up BILLIONS of gallons of water daily and displacing farmers at an alarming rate. WHERE DOES THIS MADNESS END???? WHEN THEY'VE DESTROYED ALL OF US???
why can’t they build these data centers, if they must, in the middle of the desert? Let them live out there with their robots.
They could never operate in a desert. They use up HUMONGOUS amounts of water to cool the equipment down and in the process they pollute and destroy large bodies of water. They are also taking much needed water away from farmers!!! The whole thing is one huge nightmare that must be stopped!!! HELLOOO TRUMP?!?!
Throwing more money at quick fixes while "allowing" poisonous chemicals in our food is not the answer. Make chemical companies accountable and liable, as anyone should be that produces or does something that kills or harms others AND support small organic and natural farmers who care for the food and land and are struggling in the face of big Ag. We are at a cross roads now where one can talk about becoming healthy while talking about killing with war...quite the paradox. When we love this Earth and all its incredible gifts and each other as ourselves, then maybe we will be worthy of inheriting it.
I have lived most of my adult years trying to eat organic and natural, locally produced food if we didn't get or grow it ourselves. What I expect from people in governing positions is to protect this Earth and us, we "the people", and coming generations (of all species) from harm by listening to what is needed instead of what is profitable. When we care for this planet and each other, not killing the planet and each other, prosperity and health will ensue,
Hope you are watching as this movie is released . . . signup.mahamovie.com
FROM CHD TODAY:
The following does NOT help Kennedy's and Garry's and Klar' s cases :
Cancer claims against glyphosate should still be prosecuted !
March 3, 2026 › Agency Capture › Health Conditions › News
Trump Officials With Ties to Bayer Ask Supreme Court to Wipe Out Glyphosate Cancer Claims
The Trump administration on Monday urged the U.S. Supreme Court to side with Bayer in a case that could wipe out thousands of Roundup cancer lawsuits and billions in potential liability. It was the second time the DOJ intervened in the case, and three of nine officials who signed the brief previously worked for law firms that represented Bayer.
by U.S. Right to Know
March 3, 2026
bayer logo and cancer patient
By Stacy Malkan
The Trump administration yesterday handed Bayer another win, urging the U.S. Supreme Court in a new brief to side with the German pesticide company in a high-stakes legal case that could wipe out thousands of cancer lawsuits and potentially billions of dollars in liability tied to glyphosate-based Roundup weedkiller.
Three out of nine U.S. officials who signed the brief previously worked for law firms that have represented Bayer, raising questions about whether the Trump administration is providing special favors and benefits to Bayer and siding with a foreign corporation against Americans with cancer.
The brief is the second U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) intervention in the case. In December 2025, the DOJ asked the court to review Bayer’s case. The court accepted the case in January, and oral arguments are scheduled for April 27.
In the new filing, the DOJ and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) urged the court to rule in Bayer’s favor on the central legal issue: whether federal approval of a pesticide label under federal law preempts state failure-to-warn claims.
If the court accepts that argument, individuals would be barred from suing Bayer under state law for failing to warn that Roundup may cause cancer.
The salvo for Bayer is the latest in a series of favorable actions the Trump administration has provided to Bayer.
On Feb. 18, the White House invoked the Defense Production Act to guarantee supplies of glyphosate-based herbicides and elemental phosphorus, a raw element used in the production of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides and a wide range of industrial and military chemicals.
Regulators also reapproved dicamba, a Bayer herbicide twice blocked by federal courts, and cleared the way for new pesticides containing toxic, persistent per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) “forever” chemicals.
We reviewed the company’s ties to the Trump administration and found numerous connections between Bayer’s lobby and legal firms and senior officials in decision-making positions affecting pesticide regulations, chemical safety and how our nation’s food system is shaped. The new Supreme Court filing adds more Bayer ties.
Signers on the brief include Deputy Solicitor General Sarah M. Harris, who swung between roles at President Donald Trump’s DOJ and a law firm that represented Bayer in product liability cases.
Harris was acting solicitor general from January to April 2025. Before that, she was a partner at Williams & Connolly LLP, which represented Bayer in a nationwide class action involving allegations that Bayer’s neonicotinoid insecticides harmed honeybees.
The firm also played a role in crafting Bayer’s legal arguments for the case that is now before the Supreme Court.
On its website, the firm lists among its representation experience: “Bayer in MDL and various state coordinated proceedings (comprising over 15,000 cases total),” and said it was “asked to be co-lead trial counsel in one of the two initial bellwether cases” to be tried in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, referring to one of the early Roundup trial cases before the litigation was paused for mediation.
Recent documents show the firm still representing Monsanto (now Bayer) in Roundup litigation as of 2025.
The firm also represented Monsanto in a 2025 settlement to end claims from roughly 200 people who said they were harmed by PCB contamination at a Washington state school, and in the U.S. District Court in Delaware in a legal dispute with Corteva Agriscience over patent claims.
In 2020, Williams & Connolly represented Bayer before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in litigation arising from the Mirena intrauterine device multidistrict litigation in which thousands of plaintiffs alleged injuries from the device.
Harris worked at Williams & Connolly’s Supreme Court and Appellate practice, representing clients in appeals in the high court and federal and state appellate courts.
Prior to that role, she worked for the first Trump administration, as deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel from 2017-2020.
Assistant to the U.S. solicitor general, Aaron Z. Roper, also signed the DOJ/EPA brief for Bayer, and also worked at Williams & Connolly LLP. He was an associate at the firm’s Supreme Court and Appellate practice prior to working at the DOJ.
The brief was also signed by Robert N. Stander, deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ’s Environment and Natural Resources Division. He spent roughly a decade at Jones Day, a firm that represented Bayer in matters related to its acquisition of Monsanto.
New Book: Total Load Theory, Order Today
Total Load Theory Book
Case hinges on EPA pesticide reviews
The DOJ argues in its latest brief that the Supreme Court should rule in Bayer’s favor because federal pesticide law (FIFRA) vests the EPA with the responsibility to determine what pesticide warnings are necessary to protect human health and the environment.
If EPA deems a pesticide to be safe, that is essentially the final word about product safety; in the case of glyphosate, state law requirements to warn consumers about cancer risk “second guess the judgements of EPA,” and should not be allowed, the brief argues.
“EPA registration process hinges on a robust scientific review,” the brief claims.
But EPA pesticide approvals are laden with controversy — and the glyphosate review is a prime example.
In 2022, a federal appeals court vacated parts of the EPA’s glyphosate approval, finding the agency failed to properly consider cancer risks, among other problems. The approval is under review, but past reviews have relied heavily on industry science.
In December, the same week the DOJ filed its first brief asking the Supreme Court to take Bayer’s case — and sent Bayer’s stock soaring — an academic journal retracted a key glyphosate study that informed regulatory approvals around the world, over evidence of Monsanto ghostwriting and other serious ethics violations.
The episode highlights the stakes of maintaining meaningful, independent safety assessments for chemicals. But EPA officials last year dismantled the research office that provided the scientific underpinning for risk assessments — a change EPA employees said is likely to increase political interference in decisions about chemical safety.
Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress are attempting to gut the nation’s toxics laws in ways that would limit the science used to determine health risks and give industry even more say over the chemical assessment process.
See our recent investigation into Bayer’s ties to top officials in the Trump administration.
Our Bayer lobby tracker provides information about the 45 lobbyists registered to lobby for Bayer as of the fourth quarter of 2025, the 13 lobby firms retained by Bayer, and dozens of leadership personnel at those firms who worked for the previous or current Trump administration or Trump’s presidential campaigns.
Originally published by U.S. Right to Know.
Stacy Malkan is co-founder and managing editor at U.S. Right to Know, covering public health science and tracking industry lobbying and public relations efforts.
TWENTY years a MAHA Mom left fielding poisons and reading labels like I played professional ‘poison- ball’ and worked for the ‘label police’.
PASSION? Ridding this world of poisons that made me sick with gut issues, liver methylation issues and Hashimotos.
SIX years since the bees came to me and changed my life injecting it with pure JOY. They chose me and my girls to be their ‘Queen Voice’ for this book idea that came to me and turned into a Big Mission— The Bee LOVE Mission.🐝💖
I wrote a magical Eco -Kid Hero (Earth Guardian) Adventure with my youngest daughter who wrote the characters and dialogue at 7 yo and my oldest is an illustrator and did the art.
It’s called
THE QUEEN BEE PROPHECY
A Time Travel
Earth Guardian Mission:
Bee LOVE
It’s loaded with TRUTH of why bees are sick and dying ( GLYPHOSATE, 5G , GMOs) and BEE WISDOM and what we van DO ABOUT OT. It’s layered with hope and love and envisioning our ‘Heavenly Future.’ I gave Bobby our book. Del BT and ICAN team read it but it was not the time
I thought I was late.
I recently hit publish and the next day Glyphosate got the green light and FRANCE came our saying they were banning all bee pesticides.
I wasn’t ‘late’ I was right on Divine BEE time.
Give it a buzz read and review below!
⬇️
https://a.co/d/04va8ZUz
I guarantee you and your kids will BEE- LOVE it! 🐝💖
We farm dryland soft white wheat in the PNW and although we don’t use glyphosate as a desiccant prior to harvest here, it has become increasingly used to prevent weeds on the fallow ground. We use regenerative farming practices, but that has increased the use of herbicides. In order to reduce tilling the fallow ground, that requires the use of herbicides. We would love to not have to use herbicides as they are so expensive. With the price of wheat as it was in the 1970’s and farming costs higher than ever, the future of farming is bleak.
Why not use food grade diatomaceous earth?
I’m not aware of DE killing weeds.
Thank you for your efforts & a voice of reality. Folks seem to think we can fix decades & decades of issues overnight. Hope you are receiving any new benefits which apply to you . . . https://www.usda.gov/
A minor issue, but accuracy is important for you to be believed. The pre-harvest chemical is a herbicide not a pesticide as stated in this article.
Either way a toxic poison that should not be consumed by any living organism.
The issue may mostly be a) the combination of types of chemicals and b) over use in levels not required when soils are improved. University of Rochester applied the combination of pesticides-herbacides-fungacides in feed of cows - as would be consumed by humans weight for weight -/ and the cows de eloped Parkinson within three weeks. The FDA does not test the combination of types of “ cides” … they test only one type at s time. Herein lies the problem. We have adequate technology to off ramp the combinations right now. And we needed to do all this 30 years ago while controlling electromagnetic field exposures and stemming the tick borne epidemic through honest testing and proper treatments. The result of all three areas NOT being controlled thirty years ago is the now one in five families destroyed by autism and chronic illness. Thirty years too late. You boys ain’t got time to whine. Bout off ramp technologies. Get brave.
Dr. Bhattacharya, perhaps you could look into a consultation w Dr. Ananda Shiva? She is a very well respected, no nonsense professional who has had lots of successful experience dealing w the Monsantos of the world and how to correct their destruction to our food and water. I have been following her for many years and cannot praise her enough.
Glyphosate, other herbicides, pesticides, chemical fertilizers, irrigation and diesel machinery allow the US to maintain commodity grains as a low cost global weapon, a strategic consideration since Nixon/Kissinger/Butz.
"Get big or get out", said Ag. Sec. Earl Butz.
That is the unspoken imperative...
;-(
I have to agree with Adam Garrie, although I think he should be a bit more understanding and conciliatory to those who are outraged that glyphosate will still be around. I am thinking of his offensive remark at the end : " We are not interested in you " ( that is, those who disagree with Garrie, Kennedy etc..) . Reach out specially to those that have been affected by those chemicals, and I am thinking here of a person and his wife who told their story about the unhealthy effects upon them of this nasty chemical in the comments section of a previous story.
BRAVO!!!
So it’s divisive to deviate from the party line that Trump is a gift to MAHA? We are told we are not here to be a voting bloc, but we should only support Trump and Republican candidates? Protecting Bayer is part of the off ramp? This is positively Orwellian.
the moon perhaps;))