Over Mother's Day weekend, the Trump administration launched Moms.gov and proposed a new rule expanding fertility benefits through employer plans. Inside the biggest shift in maternal health policy.
There is no US "fertility crisis," per se. There have been, however, decades long declines in birth rates, using the standard metric of live-births per 100K. These trends, closely followed for years by researchers from multiple disciplines. are attributed to multiple overlapping economic, social, cultural, and technological changes.The main factors include:
Later marriage and childbearing; People increasingly marry and have children at older ages due to education, careers, housing costs, and changing social norms. Delaying first births reduces total lifetime births on average.
Declining infant and child mortality; Historically, high birth rates partly compensated for high child mortality. As survival rates improved, desired family size fell.
Economic pressures; Housing, childcare, healthcare, and education costs have risen substantially relative to wages for many households. Economic insecurity, especially after events like the 2008 financial crisis and the pandemic, is associated with lower birth rates.
Women’s education and workforce participation; Higher female educational attainment and career opportunities correlate with lower birth rates in most developed countries, partly because of opportunity costs and delayed family formation.
Reduced unintended pregnancies; Teen pregnancy and unintended birth rates have dropped significantly over recent decades.
Wider access to contraception and legal abortion gave people greater ability to control whether and when they have children.
Cultural and lifestyle shifts; Individualism, secularization, changing attitudes toward marriage, and greater acceptance of child-free lifestyles reduced social pressure to have larger families.
Changing male economic stability; Some researchers argue that stagnant wages and declining labor-force participation among less-educated men reduced marriage rates and family formation.
Urbanization; In urban and suburban economies, children are generally a financial cost rather than labor contributors, unlike in agrarian societies.
The US decline fits a wider pattern seen across most industrialized societies, including Europe and East Asia, though the US fertility rate historically remained somewhat higher than many peers.
IVF is important for many women and their families. It is part of an effective overall strategy to address the infertility issue. That it follows a certain economic pathway for the pharmaceutical and medical industry is not an excuse to ignore it.
When you get down to it, I do agree that there really isn’t a fertility crisis. Shifting family dynamics/roles and the economy have delayed or even discouraged marriage and children. I do continue to stand against IVF.
I’m all for women’s health and women having healthy babies, but I have a bad feeling about the federal government getting involved at this level. Plus, the elephant in the room is the devastation to moms and their babies caused by the COVID shots. This problem deserves serious attention.
There's no credible evidence supporting that claim. If you really wanted to be serious, you would stop attributing every problem - or in this case phenomenon - to the same three or four convenient Boogeyman, long after causality has been excluded.
Root Causes, your response to my post is a crude exaggeration of what I actually said. And there is a preponderance of evidence that the shots have caused fetal demise. Just listen to the NICU nurses. To ignore their observations of the significant increase of fetal deaths following the role out of the shots is just plain foolish. But then, what do I know? I’m just an ordinary citizen who doesn’t stand to profit from the lie that the shots have caused no serious harm.
Edit: Also, consider this info (from AI). “Fetal demise was listed as a serious adverse event (SAE) in Pfizer's clinical trial documentation, requiring reporting if it occurred after maternal exposure to the vaccine. According to the trial protocol, intrauterine fetal demise, along with spontaneous abortion and neonatal death, was classified as an SAE….” Naomi Wolf’s book The Pfizer Papers covers this extensively.
"“Fetal demise was listed as a serious adverse event (SAE) in Pfizer's clinical trial documentation, requiring reporting if it occurred after ..."
This is standard practice in in clinical research involving any possibility of pregnancy exposures. Similar reporting requirements exist for miscarriage/spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, congenital anomalies, neonatal death and others.
The presence of an event term in an SAE reporting framework does not even indicate the event is expected at higher rates, much less establish causation. Clinical trials and post marketing surveillance systems are designed to capture any serious medical event temporally associated with exposure so, that investigators and regulators can later assess whether rates are above background expectations.
Subsequent large observational studies and surveillance analyses have not found increased rates of miscarriage or stillbirth among vaccinated pregnant women compared with expected baseline rates. Studies include;
MAHArd, thank you for your civil response, but you have to trust the publications you cited as support for your position. I don’t trust them after reading the negative experiences of some doctors and researchers concerning medical journals. Have you read Naomi Wolf’s book The Pfizer Papers?
Most of your information sources are conflicted as f-ck. They're all selling and "fundraising" - vitamins and supplements, "detox" regimens and protocols, antiparasitics, DMSO, videos and feeds to their fringe conferences, Substack subscriptions with "THE SECRETS THEY DON'T WANT YOU to KNOW, and so on - or they're referring your traffic those who are.
Peter A. McCullough AND "FOCAL POINTS" AND "TWC HEALTH" - just to make sure you don't miss anything.
Monsanto now Bayer hired their own " scientists" to "prove" that agent Orange didn't cause Vietnam veterans cancers therefore they haven't had to pay for their care. The American taxpayers are picking up the tab . Their " scientists" blamed their cancers on hereditary. If the average VV was born in the 1940s his parents and grandparents were born around the 1890s-1920s. Please look at the cancer rates during these decades. Way down on the list and in some areas completely non existent. They want us to believe that a VV from Maine not biologically related to a VV from Oregon who both got the same type of cancer after serving in Vietnam got their cancers because of hereditary. Just so you know monsanto also created GMO corn fed to animals and humans. Genetically modified hormones are injected into conventionally raised cows in the USA too. Then antibiotics are put into their feed to postpone their liver cancers ALL conventionally raised cows get when exposed to these poisons and methods.
You just confirmed that you're a gullible rube. Batty and Marty just pander for power. Marty won't actually say or write (much) crazy stuff - He pushes doubt and pages the way for grifters. And Batty is an economist and social media influencer that picked up a medical degree, never even did an internship, was proven wrong repeatedly.
The MAHA mom's should be the ones informing the government on these issues! This is just another plan to fork over huge amounts of tax dollars to pharma,the medical cartel, and god forbid, social services! Just get out of the MAHA MOMS WAY BIG GOV!
Without the mRNA "vaccine-products" cutting down ovarian egg-stores (never replenished) by 2/3 in many women, would Fertility-Services be on-the-table now?
I'm not aware of any evidence that "the mRNA "vaccine-products" cut down ovarian egg-stores" or otherwise impair female fertlity. Not as assessed by markers such as Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), Antral follicle count (AFC), menstrual function or IVF outcomes.
But I'm all-ears, as they say. What have you read?
Google searches won't go there, as you may know, but that is our present censorship environment.
I have seen a lot of data on blogs that did relate to humans, but the mouse and rat data from before the vaccine-products were released, Pfizer's data, showed mRNA lipid micelle concentration in ovaries, amongst other tissues, decreased fertility, increased miscarriage rate and fewer live births, which have showed up in humans.
Steve Kirsch is often digging up such data.
Here is a recent rat study, a fairly short term study, which shows reduction in oocytes from COVID vaccine products.
Mammalian females are born with all of their oocytes, as you may know.
ACOG killed mothers and the unborn with the COVID vaccine-products, as you know, so yes, "captured", ormaybe just part of the system for a long time.
The second and third links you provide are ACOG productions, "Ministry of Truth".
The first link is the first link that came up on the Google search I did do to scan the waterfront for the first 10 links, which were all in "lockstep" with the view you champion here.
This is "product", lies, not truth, of which you may be aware, though you will remain more comfortable if you cognitively reject it.
Myself, I advised ALL pregnant women, healthy young people, people who had recovered from COVID and all minors against the COVID vaccine-products, and offered medically appropriate patients ivermectin prophylaxis if they preferred it.
I gave away 40,000 doses of 5000IU vitamin D3 at my expense, and a lot of zinc tablets in 2020 & 2021.
I was an early-treating MD with Zelenko's protocol, then variants on Borody's protocol, before I accepted firing for "vaccine refusal" in October 2021.
I refused on the principle of "standing naked with the Jews", standing WITH the untermenschen on principle. That was the strongest moral and spiritual stance I could take, so I took it.
It worked. Enough of us "died on that hill" to prevent the critical mass needed for virtuous-culling, witch-burning, etc.
Do you see "ACOG" prominently on both front pages?
Let me quote the abstract of that second article for you. It is stating a party-line:
"In February of 2021, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) released a statement denying any link between COVID vaccination and infertility."
No, I'm not a bot. I couldn't respond in that sub-thread where you made the accusation, because someone blocked me.
What are you? Because you don't seem to have been affiliated with Austin PCC in several years (at least). That's reassuring, at least
First I phoned at the main number. Then I slipped back into physician mode to contact CMO's office, Dasgupta I think. Her assistant hadn't heard of you. It's been awhile, John.
We should chat the old fashioned way - by phone, or email. I think you can DM me here to set that up.
I was the only early-treating physician at PCC, where I worked 18 cumulative years, and accepted firing for vaccine-refusal, on the principle of "standing naked with the Jews", that is the class of "untermenschen", then being created, "the unvaccinated".
That was the strongest moral and spiritual stance I could take.
When we traveled the world with bikes and backpacks for 9 months in 2005-2006, mom. dad and 4 teenagers, we visited the Anne Frank House, Dachau (cold & rainy on bikes) and Tuol Sleng in Cambodia. The lesson was the same, that "this is what regular people do to other regular people when history goes this way".
"How will we know when to get out?"
I did not know, but when I saw it happening in my world, I knew that my job was to stand openly against it, not to get out.
Confirmed. Your mental illness was already well established 5 years ago. Guaranteed, that little vaccine kerfuffle in 2021 wasn't your only problematic behavior.
say what? Trump elevated glyphosate/Bayer to national security status ensuring that this poison will not be removed in this administration. RFK is certainly not happy about this EO.
Oh yeah! Kind of like Secretary Kennedy, the longtime environmentalist, is cool with the rollbacks of regulations on power generation plants- now guaranteed to release more mercury, arsenic, lead and other toxins - and on fossil fuel extraction.
Snark aside, there is zero evidence glyphosate use has any bearing on fertility and birth rates.
Your query spit out 3, not 4 "issues" related to pregnancy.
The first, "Preterm birth and shortened gestation," is not a measure of fertility or birth rate.
"Specifically, higher maternal urinary glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in pregnancy have been associated with greater odds of preterm birth (Silver et al., 2021), lower birthweight (Gerona et al., 2022), shortened gestational length (Parvez et al., 2018), and increased anogenital distance in female infants (Lesseur et al., 2021)."
The second, "Neurodevelopment in offspring," also not a birth rate measure - and they cite just two small studies.
And the third flat out say s, "There isn't good evidence for this" (paraphrased).
The right is pro-family. Moms.gov put some substance behind that statement. It would be a nice addition to the website to highlight the financial aspects talked about in the video.
In Europe consuming GMOs have already proven that they are one of the root causes of infertility. Don't trust American " studies" and " researchers". I was reading a Swedish newspaper almost 2 decades ago that asked it's readers not to buy their Christmas / holiday meats from Denmark because they're feeding their animals with feed from Brazil. At the time I didn't see this as bad until one of the dairy farmers who was a 6th or 7th generation farmer named Pedersen noticed that by the third generation of feeding his cows feed from Brazil he noticed that his cows were infertile. Since gmos have become the norm in the USA it is no coincidence that fertility centers have popped up everywhere. Also Oprah Winfrey did an entire show on mortality rates of mothers who had died after using IVF. Yes it's become safer but I personally know my cousin died right after giving birth to twins using IVF. I believe it is the fertility drugs. Another lady in the USA I knew also died right after giving birth. I believe it was the fertility drugs as well. How can this be that actresses like Nicole Kidman and Brooke Shields had several rounds of fertility drugs during IVF are just fine? I believe because of their fame and wealth they were treated better and monitored EVERY DAY. Their fertility drugs were injected by a professional and they didn't do that on their own.
This is gonna be pretty expensive for whichever states (I'm still not sure how it's going to work) opt in, and, with a nod to IVF and surrogate-using moms, whom I'm sure are trying hard, I'm not clear it's the best way to create families that work and children that thrive, for the IVF women I've known have been pretty tightly wound, as childbearing becomes just another goal they must reach because failure is not an option. I would prefer a Motherhood ad campaign, the creation of local mom networks to alleviate the incredible loneliness middle- and upper-middle class women experience after leaving work to raise kids, and a general de-medicalization of yet another area of life that somehow doctors and medicine men have taken over. I really worry that at the bottom of this supposed "crisis" of fertility are a lot of people who want to sell stuff and fear losing markets, and the politicians who love them.
Have you forgotten what you pasted into your own blog?
ITEM-1 "Lead with epistemic honesty. State clearly: OVERWHELMING demographic CONSENSUS ... is that MOST OF THE GLOBAL FERTILITY DECLINE IS SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND BEHAVIORAL, NOT BIOLOGICAL (UNFPA 2025, IHME/Lancet 2024, IFFS 2024, OECD 2024). This positions VitaminDWiki as a credible source, not a contrarian one."
There is no US "fertility crisis," per se. There have been, however, decades long declines in birth rates, using the standard metric of live-births per 100K. These trends, closely followed for years by researchers from multiple disciplines. are attributed to multiple overlapping economic, social, cultural, and technological changes.The main factors include:
Later marriage and childbearing; People increasingly marry and have children at older ages due to education, careers, housing costs, and changing social norms. Delaying first births reduces total lifetime births on average.
Declining infant and child mortality; Historically, high birth rates partly compensated for high child mortality. As survival rates improved, desired family size fell.
Economic pressures; Housing, childcare, healthcare, and education costs have risen substantially relative to wages for many households. Economic insecurity, especially after events like the 2008 financial crisis and the pandemic, is associated with lower birth rates.
Women’s education and workforce participation; Higher female educational attainment and career opportunities correlate with lower birth rates in most developed countries, partly because of opportunity costs and delayed family formation.
Reduced unintended pregnancies; Teen pregnancy and unintended birth rates have dropped significantly over recent decades.
Wider access to contraception and legal abortion gave people greater ability to control whether and when they have children.
Cultural and lifestyle shifts; Individualism, secularization, changing attitudes toward marriage, and greater acceptance of child-free lifestyles reduced social pressure to have larger families.
Changing male economic stability; Some researchers argue that stagnant wages and declining labor-force participation among less-educated men reduced marriage rates and family formation.
Urbanization; In urban and suburban economies, children are generally a financial cost rather than labor contributors, unlike in agrarian societies.
The US decline fits a wider pattern seen across most industrialized societies, including Europe and East Asia, though the US fertility rate historically remained somewhat higher than many peers.
This is fantastic! MAHA 🇺🇸
Structural support for the nuclear family.
IVF is not MAHA.
It doesn’t address root cause infertility, and profits Big Pharma.
IVF is important for many women and their families. It is part of an effective overall strategy to address the infertility issue. That it follows a certain economic pathway for the pharmaceutical and medical industry is not an excuse to ignore it.
I’m disappointed with the push for IVF. Let’s find root causes to infertility. More babies die each year from IVF than abortion.
The "root causes" are well understood. See my other comment.
When you get down to it, I do agree that there really isn’t a fertility crisis. Shifting family dynamics/roles and the economy have delayed or even discouraged marriage and children. I do continue to stand against IVF.
I’m all for women’s health and women having healthy babies, but I have a bad feeling about the federal government getting involved at this level. Plus, the elephant in the room is the devastation to moms and their babies caused by the COVID shots. This problem deserves serious attention.
There's no credible evidence supporting that claim. If you really wanted to be serious, you would stop attributing every problem - or in this case phenomenon - to the same three or four convenient Boogeyman, long after causality has been excluded.
Root Causes, your response to my post is a crude exaggeration of what I actually said. And there is a preponderance of evidence that the shots have caused fetal demise. Just listen to the NICU nurses. To ignore their observations of the significant increase of fetal deaths following the role out of the shots is just plain foolish. But then, what do I know? I’m just an ordinary citizen who doesn’t stand to profit from the lie that the shots have caused no serious harm.
Edit: Also, consider this info (from AI). “Fetal demise was listed as a serious adverse event (SAE) in Pfizer's clinical trial documentation, requiring reporting if it occurred after maternal exposure to the vaccine. According to the trial protocol, intrauterine fetal demise, along with spontaneous abortion and neonatal death, was classified as an SAE….” Naomi Wolf’s book The Pfizer Papers covers this extensively.
I responded to your words - "... The elephant in the room is the devastation to moms and their babies caused by the COVID shots."
You offered nothing but an even more preposterous contention -
"... there is a preponderance of evidence that the shots have caused fetal demise."
"Root Causes", you have a bullying-bot voice.
Just read my entire reply, dear. 🙂btw, I edited my comment over an hour before your latest reply.
"“Fetal demise was listed as a serious adverse event (SAE) in Pfizer's clinical trial documentation, requiring reporting if it occurred after ..."
This is standard practice in in clinical research involving any possibility of pregnancy exposures. Similar reporting requirements exist for miscarriage/spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, congenital anomalies, neonatal death and others.
The presence of an event term in an SAE reporting framework does not even indicate the event is expected at higher rates, much less establish causation. Clinical trials and post marketing surveillance systems are designed to capture any serious medical event temporally associated with exposure so, that investigators and regulators can later assess whether rates are above background expectations.
Subsequent large observational studies and surveillance analyses have not found increased rates of miscarriage or stillbirth among vaccinated pregnant women compared with expected baseline rates. Studies include;
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784193
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
And data from CDC's COVID-19 vaccine pregnancy registry: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety-systems/monitoring/covid-preg-reg.html
MAHArd, thank you for your civil response, but you have to trust the publications you cited as support for your position. I don’t trust them after reading the negative experiences of some doctors and researchers concerning medical journals. Have you read Naomi Wolf’s book The Pfizer Papers?
And you trust whom?
https://substack.com/@deesmitheducator/following
Most of your information sources are conflicted as f-ck. They're all selling and "fundraising" - vitamins and supplements, "detox" regimens and protocols, antiparasitics, DMSO, videos and feeds to their fringe conferences, Substack subscriptions with "THE SECRETS THEY DON'T WANT YOU to KNOW, and so on - or they're referring your traffic those who are.
Peter A. McCullough AND "FOCAL POINTS" AND "TWC HEALTH" - just to make sure you don't miss anything.
Are "you" a bot?
So much for being civil, MAHArd. Adios!
Are "you" a bot, "MAHArd"?
Root Causes, "you" have a rude-bot" voice.
Monsanto now Bayer hired their own " scientists" to "prove" that agent Orange didn't cause Vietnam veterans cancers therefore they haven't had to pay for their care. The American taxpayers are picking up the tab . Their " scientists" blamed their cancers on hereditary. If the average VV was born in the 1940s his parents and grandparents were born around the 1890s-1920s. Please look at the cancer rates during these decades. Way down on the list and in some areas completely non existent. They want us to believe that a VV from Maine not biologically related to a VV from Oregon who both got the same type of cancer after serving in Vietnam got their cancers because of hereditary. Just so you know monsanto also created GMO corn fed to animals and humans. Genetically modified hormones are injected into conventionally raised cows in the USA too. Then antibiotics are put into their feed to postpone their liver cancers ALL conventionally raised cows get when exposed to these poisons and methods.
FYI, after being accused of following charlatans selling vitamins…, here are some of the doctors and others I follow:
-RFK, Jr.
-Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
-Dr. Meryl Nass
-Dr. Suzanne Humphries
-Dr. Sabine Hazan
-Dr. Ryan Cole
-Dr. Marty Makary
-Jessica Rose, Ph.D.
You just confirmed that you're a gullible rube. Batty and Marty just pander for power. Marty won't actually say or write (much) crazy stuff - He pushes doubt and pages the way for grifters. And Batty is an economist and social media influencer that picked up a medical degree, never even did an internship, was proven wrong repeatedly.
The MAHA mom's should be the ones informing the government on these issues! This is just another plan to fork over huge amounts of tax dollars to pharma,the medical cartel, and god forbid, social services! Just get out of the MAHA MOMS WAY BIG GOV!
Without the mRNA "vaccine-products" cutting down ovarian egg-stores (never replenished) by 2/3 in many women, would Fertility-Services be on-the-table now?
;-o
I'm not aware of any evidence that "the mRNA "vaccine-products" cut down ovarian egg-stores" or otherwise impair female fertlity. Not as assessed by markers such as Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), Antral follicle count (AFC), menstrual function or IVF outcomes.
But I'm all-ears, as they say. What have you read?
Google searches won't go there, as you may know, but that is our present censorship environment.
I have seen a lot of data on blogs that did relate to humans, but the mouse and rat data from before the vaccine-products were released, Pfizer's data, showed mRNA lipid micelle concentration in ovaries, amongst other tissues, decreased fertility, increased miscarriage rate and fewer live births, which have showed up in humans.
Steve Kirsch is often digging up such data.
Here is a recent rat study, a fairly short term study, which shows reduction in oocytes from COVID vaccine products.
Mammalian females are born with all of their oocytes, as you may know.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12031016/
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/4/345
Not Google searches
You know better than to foist a small study in a rodent model on me - N=30 for 3 conditions? Not even much of a rat study.
Human, at least - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648322004242
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36919413
Or some of the studies cited in this Dec. 2023 review published in Reproductive Science; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38151655/
Or from this March 2026 ACOG review; https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2020/12/covid-19-vaccination-considerations-for-obstetric-gynecologic-care
Too "captured?"
ACOG killed mothers and the unborn with the COVID vaccine-products, as you know, so yes, "captured", ormaybe just part of the system for a long time.
The second and third links you provide are ACOG productions, "Ministry of Truth".
The first link is the first link that came up on the Google search I did do to scan the waterfront for the first 10 links, which were all in "lockstep" with the view you champion here.
This is "product", lies, not truth, of which you may be aware, though you will remain more comfortable if you cognitively reject it.
Myself, I advised ALL pregnant women, healthy young people, people who had recovered from COVID and all minors against the COVID vaccine-products, and offered medically appropriate patients ivermectin prophylaxis if they preferred it.
I gave away 40,000 doses of 5000IU vitamin D3 at my expense, and a lot of zinc tablets in 2020 & 2021.
I was an early-treating MD with Zelenko's protocol, then variants on Borody's protocol, before I accepted firing for "vaccine refusal" in October 2021.
I refused on the principle of "standing naked with the Jews", standing WITH the untermenschen on principle. That was the strongest moral and spiritual stance I could take, so I took it.
It worked. Enough of us "died on that hill" to prevent the critical mass needed for virtuous-culling, witch-burning, etc.
You can't even lie competently. ACOG and SRI/SGI are separate organizations, based in DC and Milwaukee, respectively. One is much more sciencey.
Look at those second and third links.
Do you see "ACOG" prominently on both front pages?
Let me quote the abstract of that second article for you. It is stating a party-line:
"In February of 2021, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) released a statement denying any link between COVID vaccination and infertility."
No, I'm not a bot. I couldn't respond in that sub-thread where you made the accusation, because someone blocked me.
What are you? Because you don't seem to have been affiliated with Austin PCC in several years (at least). That's reassuring, at least
First I phoned at the main number. Then I slipped back into physician mode to contact CMO's office, Dasgupta I think. Her assistant hadn't heard of you. It's been awhile, John.
We should chat the old fashioned way - by phone, or email. I think you can DM me here to set that up.
I was the only early-treating physician at PCC, where I worked 18 cumulative years, and accepted firing for vaccine-refusal, on the principle of "standing naked with the Jews", that is the class of "untermenschen", then being created, "the unvaccinated".
That was the strongest moral and spiritual stance I could take.
When we traveled the world with bikes and backpacks for 9 months in 2005-2006, mom. dad and 4 teenagers, we visited the Anne Frank House, Dachau (cold & rainy on bikes) and Tuol Sleng in Cambodia. The lesson was the same, that "this is what regular people do to other regular people when history goes this way".
"How will we know when to get out?"
I did not know, but when I saw it happening in my world, I knew that my job was to stand openly against it, not to get out.
I am readily contacted here: https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/
Dr. Dasgupta is newish at PCC, and very quick and businesslike with patients, I hear from an old friend and former patient.
He has complained to the clinic about her missing his PE and also, later, his cellulitis on his non-amputated lower limb (with internal hardware).
Confirmed. Your mental illness was already well established 5 years ago. Guaranteed, that little vaccine kerfuffle in 2021 wasn't your only problematic behavior.
Now go back to pontificating for your playmates.
Ooh, "You" do sound like AI now. ;-}
Seek (truth) and Ye shall find...
"In The Beginning", Moody Blues: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pS2tGZrLGSs
You do sound mentally ill. Or you had some fun mushrooms for breakfast.
DM me your contact info if you'd like me to ridicule you more. Have a nice day.
Have a nice day, ridicule-bot.
;-)
Moms.gov fails to mention the importance of Vitamin D
https://vitamindwiki.com/pages/page-15693/
That's a random anonymous Wiki. There might be some facts buried in with all of that amateurish slop.
An interesting take on vitamin D from Dr Paul Mason here https://youtu.be/NVqNO8rgYKk?si=or1pcJuCs9ZZpt0b
its a little late. Glyphosate says it all.
Glyohosate accounts for none of it. But fortunately, Secretary Kennedy has taken care of that issue.
say what? Trump elevated glyphosate/Bayer to national security status ensuring that this poison will not be removed in this administration. RFK is certainly not happy about this EO.
Oh yeah! Kind of like Secretary Kennedy, the longtime environmentalist, is cool with the rollbacks of regulations on power generation plants- now guaranteed to release more mercury, arsenic, lead and other toxins - and on fossil fuel extraction.
Snark aside, there is zero evidence glyphosate use has any bearing on fertility and birth rates.
There are 4+ documented problems of Glyphosate while pregnant
https://claude.ai/share/cf17ec60-c2b8-4a41-8b0e-cafe9875c7dc
Your query spit out 3, not 4 "issues" related to pregnancy.
The first, "Preterm birth and shortened gestation," is not a measure of fertility or birth rate.
"Specifically, higher maternal urinary glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in pregnancy have been associated with greater odds of preterm birth (Silver et al., 2021), lower birthweight (Gerona et al., 2022), shortened gestational length (Parvez et al., 2018), and increased anogenital distance in female infants (Lesseur et al., 2021)."
The second, "Neurodevelopment in offspring," also not a birth rate measure - and they cite just two small studies.
And the third flat out say s, "There isn't good evidence for this" (paraphrased).
what makes you think he is “cool” with decisions he has zero control over?
The right is pro-family. Moms.gov put some substance behind that statement. It would be a nice addition to the website to highlight the financial aspects talked about in the video.
In Europe consuming GMOs have already proven that they are one of the root causes of infertility. Don't trust American " studies" and " researchers". I was reading a Swedish newspaper almost 2 decades ago that asked it's readers not to buy their Christmas / holiday meats from Denmark because they're feeding their animals with feed from Brazil. At the time I didn't see this as bad until one of the dairy farmers who was a 6th or 7th generation farmer named Pedersen noticed that by the third generation of feeding his cows feed from Brazil he noticed that his cows were infertile. Since gmos have become the norm in the USA it is no coincidence that fertility centers have popped up everywhere. Also Oprah Winfrey did an entire show on mortality rates of mothers who had died after using IVF. Yes it's become safer but I personally know my cousin died right after giving birth to twins using IVF. I believe it is the fertility drugs. Another lady in the USA I knew also died right after giving birth. I believe it was the fertility drugs as well. How can this be that actresses like Nicole Kidman and Brooke Shields had several rounds of fertility drugs during IVF are just fine? I believe because of their fame and wealth they were treated better and monitored EVERY DAY. Their fertility drugs were injected by a professional and they didn't do that on their own.
This is gonna be pretty expensive for whichever states (I'm still not sure how it's going to work) opt in, and, with a nod to IVF and surrogate-using moms, whom I'm sure are trying hard, I'm not clear it's the best way to create families that work and children that thrive, for the IVF women I've known have been pretty tightly wound, as childbearing becomes just another goal they must reach because failure is not an option. I would prefer a Motherhood ad campaign, the creation of local mom networks to alleviate the incredible loneliness middle- and upper-middle class women experience after leaving work to raise kids, and a general de-medicalization of yet another area of life that somehow doctors and medicine men have taken over. I really worry that at the bottom of this supposed "crisis" of fertility are a lot of people who want to sell stuff and fear losing markets, and the politicians who love them.
IVF 4X more successful for white women with lots of vitamin D – many studies
https://vitamindwiki.com/pages/ivf-4x-more-successful-for-white-women-with-lots-of-vitamin-d-many-studies/
Have you forgotten what you pasted into your own blog?
ITEM-1 "Lead with epistemic honesty. State clearly: OVERWHELMING demographic CONSENSUS ... is that MOST OF THE GLOBAL FERTILITY DECLINE IS SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND BEHAVIORAL, NOT BIOLOGICAL (UNFPA 2025, IHME/Lancet 2024, IFFS 2024, OECD 2024). This positions VitaminDWiki as a credible source, not a contrarian one."
Live birth 1.7 X more likely after IVF if good level of vitamin D – meta-analysis
https://vitamindwiki.com/pages/live-birth-17-x-more-likely-after-ivf-if-good-level-of-vitamin-d-meta-analysis/
Birth rates are declining: 7 of the top 15 reasons are low Vitamin D
https://vitamindwiki.com/pages/page-15674/