39 Comments
User's avatar
Truth Seeker's avatar

It would take 20 minutes to suggest how to provide nutritious food for school children.

Spending 33 mil is a ridiculous waste of funds. Pathetic

Sara A's avatar

Seriously? The old teach a man to fish doesn’t apply here? Healthy eating isn’t rocket science. Kids will only truly learn in a holistic model. Stop making their lunches and teach them how to prepare food without a microwave! Teach them how to shop for nutritious foods. Our education model has become so dumbed down that we treat basic survival skills like it’s in need of a $33M revamp. Homeschooling is more appealing every day.

Truth Seeker's avatar

Homeschooling was always the way forward decades ago...

Sonia Nordenson's avatar

Baby steps, Sara. Gotta start somewhere.

Sara A's avatar

Almost $33M is a massive baby step.

V. N. Alexander's avatar

I tried to get my local school to stop serving sweetened milk with cheese pizza and a sugared fruit cup for lunch 3 times a week. It turned out that that was the favored menu because the school could get reimbursed from the Federal gov for that meal. I wrote a comic novel about it called Locus Amoenus. "Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said... that the government will no longer spend taxpayer dollars on food that undermines their health.” That's a good first step. Do no harm.

Kathy Boston's avatar

Every school should have a vegetable garden and teach the kids how to maintain it and use those vegetables during their lunches.

prsmith's avatar

Nope, a feed lot for animals. Vegetables are a waste in many ways and ae terrible for the soil.

Truth Seeker's avatar

A very small subset has done this, a great solution.

Off season there are educational tools.

Truth Seeker's avatar

The "food pyramid" whether inverted or not is un-necessary

Suckling cows, is ill advised.

Organic fruits and vegetables for the win. Minimal processing of

"cooked" entrees. A revolving menu consisting of 10-15 nutritious easily prepared

meals is a couple hour project... This 33million "study" is worse than stupid.

It is not "negative" to call out exorbitant waste of funds, it is responsible for

the benefit of all. Food options are simple.

Jerry Todd's avatar

Obama lunches were consistently thrown away.

Donald's avatar

Sounds extremely expensive on the verge of ridiculous.

Truth Seeker's avatar

It is over the top stupid

prsmith's avatar

Those 'in command' have to get rich somehow.

Truth Seeker's avatar

The top of this tree is Sec. Kennedy himself as the head

of the HHS. Appears to be pure grift.

Vinu Arumugham #MAHA's avatar

The government has no business running schools or providing lunch. Get government out of our lives. Everything they touch turns into a disaster.

Carol's avatar

The problem is not so much what to serve, it is getting the kids to eat it. I remember years ago Jamie Oliver making and promoting relatively healthy school lunches in the UK. My overriding memory of that is irate (supremely healthy? ) mamas passing McDonalds through the railings to their deprived children. The poor darlings had been served a delicious chicken pasta or something, nothing as exotic as broccoli.

TayKat's avatar

Seriously? Just ask a few grandmas how to feed a kid. What needs to be 'studied'?

prsmith's avatar

Get rid of sugar, grain products, seed oils and most vegetables and you've got healthy food. Simple and free..no $33 million required.

Truth Seeker's avatar

The entire debacle is predicated on the false belief that the Gubmint is somehow responsible

for feeding peoples children, and dictating the quality.

Parents by definition are responsible. Parents that are totally ignorant need education, preferably before they reproduce.

The very fact this discussion is front row and center is an admission of failure on many fronts.

Sending lunch with a child that is very satisfying and nutritious is easily accomplished.

prsmith's avatar

If the government is going to subsume the role then the government is responsible for doing it right.

Truth Seeker's avatar

As mentioned, the responsibility for personal health is on every shoulder.

It is not Gubmints purview.

prsmith's avatar

General Welfare clause. They stretch a lot.

I DO NOT CONSENT's avatar

Ah, the ‘golden number’ ritual 👁️

Truth Seeker's avatar

You are correct... few comprehend

I DO NOT CONSENT's avatar

It’s a very dark road to travel, and the diversionary ‘politics as usual’ is much easier and ‘real’, to get involved with. Unfortunately, until people fully grasp what is going on, they won’t conquer the pathetic divisive illusion that is ‘politics’.

Gayla's avatar

We know they can be cooked at the schools, and they can be made healthier. The issue is, the kids have been raised on drive thru windows, and snacks/candy. Good luck getting kids with that palette to eat the healthy food. Most will end up in the trash, and the kids will sit with empty bellies.

Why not spend the effort getting mRNA injections banned? That would truly protect the children! Ih wait, the mRNA flu shot was just approved. So much for protecting the kids.

Truth Seeker's avatar

Big P has always controlled the ABC agencies. The responsibility for health falls on every shoulder, there are no shortcuts. If there was a huge decrease in customers Big P circles the bowl. The same is true for confidence in the Medical Cartel.

Hunger is a serious motivator...

prsmith's avatar

Great reason to feed them junk food at school. geeze.

Gayla's avatar

This very proposal has been tried before. The kids threw the healthy food into the trash.

But, some people have to pee on that hot wire for themselves. Waste the money again to try what’s already been tried, and failed.

prsmith's avatar

Then they go hungry...so sad, too bad. It would be a lot less wasted than that $33million.

If the government is going to feed them using our tax dollars, they have an obligation to serve healthy food.

Gayla's avatar

If it’s ok for the children to go hungry, maybe we shouldn’t feed them at all. Save the $33 million, and future tax dollars, if you say the kids can just “go hungry”.

prsmith's avatar

Perfectly fine if they chose not to eat. I'd prefer not to feed them at all and let their parents feed them. The parents of any child who fail to feed them should cool their heels in jail so they can think about what they're doing to their kids...and they should pay for the privilege.

Truth Seeker's avatar

It is not just the mRNA, but those are very very different issues.

Last I checked the jabs were 100% voluntary.

Howz about outing the Medical Doctors who profit and perpeptute this fraud??

Gayla's avatar

Voluntary, or not, if they are removed from being offered altogether, then fear won’t drive parents, who have zero clue because the media just calls them “vaccines”, won’t be able to kill their kids by allowing an injection that can cause myocarditis, pericarditis, and myopericarditis.

And I think most doctors are too trusting, and believe what the salespeople tell them, and what they hear at CE conferences. Let’s remove the products and eliminate doctors’ ability to be shills for them.

Truth Seeker's avatar

You are making the case for banning pharmaceuticals. That would be a temporaty solution as people "believe" in them due to Medical propaganda.

That would create a black market for vaccines.

MD's are responsible for knowing, stepping far outside of a "trust" issue.

Knowingly or not, it is printing get out of jail free passes for the MD's...

Gayla's avatar
9mEdited

I’d ban a lot of the pharmaceuticals, probably 85%.

Actually, my original message was why the food idea is a waste of funds. Maybe people are like turkeys and wake up in a different world every morning. The healthy school food was implemented under the Obama administration. It was one of Michelle Obama’s initiatives. It did not work. The food ended up in the dumpsters. Hasn’t anyone paid attention the last 15-20 years? Must we try to reinvent the wheel? Or can we find a way to spend money wisely?

Truth Seeker's avatar

No reason to disparage turkeys.

We are actually discussing standards. No reason to re-invent anything.

Implementation of nutritious delicious food, not pandering to inverted

junk fooders. If they are hungry for a week that is their choice.

As is true in any venture, choosing wisely is the way forward.

Sonia Nordenson's avatar

Another positive voice heard from.