“.. it appears that the paper was never submitted for publication even though the study protocols lined up with the design for a vaxed/un-vaxed study established by the Centers for Disease Control years prior to the start of the research.” {Updated my comment with *6 & *7]
…
On September 25th, on his show “The HighWire,” Del Bigtree reported that HFH had sent ICAN a cease-and-desist” letter on Sept 19th. He showed excerpts including, “the truth is that the draft study did not proceed past initial co-author and internal independent peer reviews and was never submitted due to significant and serious flaws in its data and methodology.” (@5:13)*6
Detroit Free Press reporter Kristen Shamus interviewed Christine Cole Johnson (HFH Chair of Public Health Science)*17 who was the boss of the study's co-author Dr. Lois Lamerato. Johnson claimed “she” [Dr. Lois Lamerato] came to her with concerns about her “draft” ...” Johnson called the “fatally flawed” study “among the "worst studies I've ever seen” … "If this had been submitted to a journal of any credibility, they would have laughed it off." She described what she alleged were “multiple problems with the design … [five serious] flaws*7 in research.”
In contrast to Johnson's claim, I think that Aaron Siri (ICAN's attorney who presented the study at the Sept 9th hearing) tells a more credible story about what actually happened during the so-called HFH “internal peer review” process:
“The study was “set to be submitted for publication [not a “draft”] in a medical journal after it was completed, but the researchers did not go through with the submission. I met with Dr . Lamerto ask why it was not submitted. She reaffirmed that she and Dr. Zervos both thought their study was well designed, executed, and worthy of publication [so much for Johnson's claim that Lamerato “had concerns”]*12
“The issue, she [Lamerato] explained, was that the higher-ups [Johnson, etc.] at Henry Ford Health, to whom she was required to send a copy before submission, made it plain that they did not want it submitted for publication.”*12
“I [Siri] kept asking what the substantive grounds were for not submitting. The reasons provided [HFH's & Johnson's list of “serious flaws”]*7 were easily addressed. They were all plainly pretextual … they were excuses, not reasons to not submit for publication. The real reason it was not submitted for publication, no doubt, was because of its finding that vaxxed children suffered from multiple times the rate of various serious ailments.”*12
Why did Zervos fear losing his career? I believe the answer lies with HFH's so-called “internal independent peer review.” This appears to be Henry Ford PR speak for “your bosses gate-keep your work and shove it in a drawer if they don't like it”! Although, it's not clear to me how your bosses are your “peers”? Or how an employee is “independent” of his bosses!).
Note: If you want more details on my take, see my pinned comments (about 23 pages) at Steve Kirsch's post https://kirschsubstack.com/p/my-email-to-henry-ford-media-relations. Since then, I've been revising my comments into a 30-page series that I will put out later this week in my forthcoming Substack “The Feral Firefighter”
Well done Guy. Here are some thoughts. (Not a education wannabe /
Doctorate Level Bio Science combo. Many decades "practice")
Peer review has always been pay to play. The vax or chemical manufacturers use career ending character assassination on any published effort including peer review studies showing harm from products . To include chemicals, herbicides, pesticides, vaxs, etc.
No shortage of PhD's happy to lend their credential.
After countless examples over decades conclude that Peer Review is hopelessly problematic when contrary to economic incentives of manufacturers.
Monsanto, now Bayer, has paid out hundreds of millions for a few Non Hodgkins Lymphoma cases caused by their well known herbicide. Glyphosate is still widely used by millions. Box stores are happy to sell it from well stocked aisle ends.
Death and disabilty directly from mRNA is astronomical at over 30 million.
The good news is that consumer confidence has never been lower for the mRNA quaxcines causing economic calamity in biotech companies. Supply exceeds demand.
The Medical Profession functioning as incentivized delivery boys for the vaxs and quaxs
"In 2018, the lead researcher, Dr. Marcus Zervos, agreed to do the study after meeting with Bigtree and Attorney Aaron Siri."
. . .
On Sept 9, 2025, the Henry Ford Study*24 was finally introduced to the public by ICAN attorney Aaron Siri during a hearing conducted by Senator Ron Johnson*2
Insinuating that it's innate, eh, therefore alleviating causation? or, simply put, chosing your words carefully. - "This suggests that in certain children, exposure to vaccination may increase the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition, particularly for one of these conditions."
Child sacrifice caused by poison in a needle to feed the machine.
I did not take that as an insinuation. Everyone is different and while some may be prone to vax injuries, others are not. I worked as a MA in pediatrics for 20 years. I administered many, many vaccines during that period. It was my training and I believed in the benefits of the regimen. I cannot point to any of MY patients having an immediate adverse reaction directly from vaccinations. My children received all their vaccines and thankfully did well. Did I see a general exponential increase of cases of Autism, ADHD, Obesity, and other disorders? Yes, I did. Did I correlate them solely with vaccinations? I did not because we have also been exposed to environmental chemicals and disrupters, radiation, ultra processed foods, laxed parenting (or lack of knowledge). There’s also the genetic makeup of each individual that may also be triggered. That said, in my last years I did more triage and had many conversations and there were the few that had concerns about vaccines causing certain issues in their children and wanting to halt or stagger vaccines… I think parents should not be forced to take vaccines for their children if they don’t want them. Protocols should be in place because inevitably people may get sick with some of these “childhood “ illnesses, but parents should have the choice and then be educated on other ways to keep children healthy. We don’t have enough children as it is and we certainly don’t want to see an increase of children dying before the age of 5 as it was 100-125 years ago.
I didn’t say that. I said I didn’t witness any adverse effects from vaccines in any of the patients I personally took care of from infancy into adulthood, that includes my own children. I can also attest that I saw newborn babies that already had issues that later would be diagnosed as autism, pervasive developmental delays, and other neurodevelopmental issues. That could be for another number of reasons.
Shocking that when you see a physician 7 times per year (vaccinated group) they're more likely to diagnose a disease than when you see a physician only 2 times per year (unvaccinated group). The vaccinated group was also watched for twice as long (follow up time of approx 2.7 years in vaccinated vs 1.3 years in unvaccinated). More time = more opportunity for diagnosis.
That's just one confounder, not even addressing poor methods, unrecognized confounders, statistic implausibilities, decreased power of the smaller sample size in unvaccinated, attrition bias, etc. It's very easy to feed this *crap* to laypeople who don't have enough background knowledge to see through all of that.
A sensitivity analysis was performed to address exactly this confounder, yet the findings persisted.
"The study was reviewed and approved by HFHS’s Institutional Review Board and conducted in accordance with the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology’s Guidelines for Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practices"
This suggests the study was credible and properly executed. The CDC guidelines for studying safety of vaccines were followed "to the T," per the admission of the authors in a secret recording.
It makes me mental to know that this Dr Thomas lost his medical license over this, however many times I have heard it happen to other doctors . And to see this Dr Zervos wimp out to save his career. Not really caring about patients out there who might be affected by vaccines. There is a reign of terror out there by cruel and corrupt elites ,and they have managed to scare so many people, who got into that profession to heal. If you can't heal anymore with a clear conscience and to your satisfaction, get out and join the resistance!
And thanks to Del Bigtree for this documentary. OK, I have not seen it yet, so my thanks might be premature. But I have read a lot by him, perused his site, and I trust him. OK 2, I would not have spoken in front of a MAGA audience ( as I beleive he did) , and I would clearly keep my distance from them, while agreeing to temporarily cooperate , as I am doing in a very little way here.
It’s time to replace vaccines with something that is safe, effective and healthy.
I constantly hear that health officials are looking into new treatments for disease.
If they are truly committed to finding an alternative to vaccines and pharmaceuticals, ozone water must be considered.
I would like to suggest an unexplored preventative approach.
My approach centers around ozone infused water, which consists of the two things that the body can’t live without, oxygen and water.
Understanding the science.
Ozone comprises of 3 oxygen molecules that are loosely connected by an electric charge. Oxygen prefers to occupy space as a pair, so the 3rd oxygen molecule and its charge are easy removed by anything organic. This makes ozone a powerful oxidizer that will immediately destroy any virus or bacteria. As little as 5ppm of ozone will literally melt every virus and bacteria. incredibly. An example of oxidation is a fire place. Put wood in and ashes come out. Fire is a form of oxidation, it requires oxygen to burn.
When ozone is mixed with water the ozone will “burn” or oxidize organics and minerals dissolved in the water, yet be buffered by the water so that it is safe to drink or apply to the skin. Water acts as a transfer agent to safely direct ozone to any surface. This process will safely disinfect or even sterilize the water depending on the amount of ozone injected and the biological load in the water. Essentially ozone will improve any water quality. It will turn tap water into a powerful organic disinfectant - sterilizer. It will remove the odor from sewer water. It will naturally soften the water so scale does not build up in plumbing. Ozone oxidation alters the chemical composition of water so pathogens are oxidized and minerals are chelated.
The fact is that once ozone water can be enriched to the point of sterilization and the water will then sterilize anything that it touches. The caveat is that ozone water quickly releases the oxygen, so ozone water must be produced and used immediately to be most effective. When used immediately ozone water is the safest, most powerful disinfectant on earth. Ozone water can’t be bottled and sold off the shelf. This fact makes it unprofitable for companies selling health and wellness.
A new approach to health is organic, easy, inexpensive, and extremely effective.
Organic. The only ingredients are oxygen and water.
Easy. Simply make ozone water your drinking water, apply it to your skin, and inhale a fine mist of it.
Inexpensive. Portable ozone generators cost around $100 and last for years. Ozone faucets are on a par with Reverse Osmosis systems, however they have lights that indicate that they are working and don’t require annual maintenance.
Daily applications of ozone water will disinfect your body, mouth, throat and lungs. If applied daily ALL infectious disease will be prevented. This is a cure for the common cold, the flu, Covid, bird flu and all other diseases. I consider ozone water to be a “UNIVERSAL PANACEA “. This new approach is a simple plan to eliminate a vast majority of all diseases.
Just as its true that MAHA derives from MAGA, it is equally true that An Inconvenient Study
originates from grifter Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth.
Studies are considered to be evidence. The Philosophy of Health "trumps" any study when comprehension is adequate. Researchers are unwilling to sacrifice their careers
for science and evidence until Conscience forces the hand usually at retirement as we see in this case.
The fork in the road? Getting people to believe that health comes from needles.
I wouldn't be surprised if there was some deeper game going on here, and Zervos arranged to allow Bigtree to "covertly" record their conversation, for the very reasons stated in the recorded interview.
“.. it appears that the paper was never submitted for publication even though the study protocols lined up with the design for a vaxed/un-vaxed study established by the Centers for Disease Control years prior to the start of the research.” {Updated my comment with *6 & *7]
…
On September 25th, on his show “The HighWire,” Del Bigtree reported that HFH had sent ICAN a cease-and-desist” letter on Sept 19th. He showed excerpts including, “the truth is that the draft study did not proceed past initial co-author and internal independent peer reviews and was never submitted due to significant and serious flaws in its data and methodology.” (@5:13)*6
Detroit Free Press reporter Kristen Shamus interviewed Christine Cole Johnson (HFH Chair of Public Health Science)*17 who was the boss of the study's co-author Dr. Lois Lamerato. Johnson claimed “she” [Dr. Lois Lamerato] came to her with concerns about her “draft” ...” Johnson called the “fatally flawed” study “among the "worst studies I've ever seen” … "If this had been submitted to a journal of any credibility, they would have laughed it off." She described what she alleged were “multiple problems with the design … [five serious] flaws*7 in research.”
In contrast to Johnson's claim, I think that Aaron Siri (ICAN's attorney who presented the study at the Sept 9th hearing) tells a more credible story about what actually happened during the so-called HFH “internal peer review” process:
“The study was “set to be submitted for publication [not a “draft”] in a medical journal after it was completed, but the researchers did not go through with the submission. I met with Dr . Lamerto ask why it was not submitted. She reaffirmed that she and Dr. Zervos both thought their study was well designed, executed, and worthy of publication [so much for Johnson's claim that Lamerato “had concerns”]*12
“The issue, she [Lamerato] explained, was that the higher-ups [Johnson, etc.] at Henry Ford Health, to whom she was required to send a copy before submission, made it plain that they did not want it submitted for publication.”*12
“I [Siri] kept asking what the substantive grounds were for not submitting. The reasons provided [HFH's & Johnson's list of “serious flaws”]*7 were easily addressed. They were all plainly pretextual … they were excuses, not reasons to not submit for publication. The real reason it was not submitted for publication, no doubt, was because of its finding that vaxxed children suffered from multiple times the rate of various serious ailments.”*12
Why did Zervos fear losing his career? I believe the answer lies with HFH's so-called “internal independent peer review.” This appears to be Henry Ford PR speak for “your bosses gate-keep your work and shove it in a drawer if they don't like it”! Although, it's not clear to me how your bosses are your “peers”? Or how an employee is “independent” of his bosses!).
REFERENCES:
*6: “The HighWire” (9/25/25 Episode 443) https://rumble.com/v6zgl0m-episode-443-cease-and-desist.html?e9s=src_v1_clr%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a @4:03 Cease & Desist Letter and trailer with hidden camera footage.
*7: Henry Ford Health, “Henry Ford Health Denounces Claim That System Suppressed Research, Cautions Against Dangerous Viral Disinformation and Misinformation” (9/26/250 https://www.henryford.com/news/2025/09/vaccine-study-henry-ford-health
*12: Excerpts from Aaron Sir's book, pp. 242-243, “Vaccines, Amen” https://www.amazon.com/Vaccines-Amen-Religion-Aaron-Siri-ebook/dp/B0D486KY77?ref_=ast_author_mpb
*17: 10/07/25 – Kristen Jordan Shamus, “Henry Ford Health warns anti-vaccine group to stop using info from 'fatally flawed' project” was published in The Detroit Free Press (Detroit Free Press) https://www.freep.com/story/news/health/2025/10/07/henry-ford-health-vaccine-study-informed-consent-action-network/86372042007/
Note: If you want more details on my take, see my pinned comments (about 23 pages) at Steve Kirsch's post https://kirschsubstack.com/p/my-email-to-henry-ford-media-relations. Since then, I've been revising my comments into a 30-page series that I will put out later this week in my forthcoming Substack “The Feral Firefighter”
Well done Guy. Here are some thoughts. (Not a education wannabe /
Doctorate Level Bio Science combo. Many decades "practice")
Peer review has always been pay to play. The vax or chemical manufacturers use career ending character assassination on any published effort including peer review studies showing harm from products . To include chemicals, herbicides, pesticides, vaxs, etc.
No shortage of PhD's happy to lend their credential.
After countless examples over decades conclude that Peer Review is hopelessly problematic when contrary to economic incentives of manufacturers.
Monsanto, now Bayer, has paid out hundreds of millions for a few Non Hodgkins Lymphoma cases caused by their well known herbicide. Glyphosate is still widely used by millions. Box stores are happy to sell it from well stocked aisle ends.
Death and disabilty directly from mRNA is astronomical at over 30 million.
The good news is that consumer confidence has never been lower for the mRNA quaxcines causing economic calamity in biotech companies. Supply exceeds demand.
The Medical Profession functioning as incentivized delivery boys for the vaxs and quaxs
are currently experiencing the same loss.
"In 2018, the lead researcher, Dr. Marcus Zervos, agreed to do the study after meeting with Bigtree and Attorney Aaron Siri."
. . .
On Sept 9, 2025, the Henry Ford Study*24 was finally introduced to the public by ICAN attorney Aaron Siri during a hearing conducted by Senator Ron Johnson*2
I'd suggest reading Aaron Siri's written Senate testimony which walks a reader through the Henry Ford Study (modified from CH 12 of Siri's excellent new book "Vaccines, Amen") https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Siri-Testimony-1.pdf(modified
REFERENCES:
*2: 9/09/25 – How the Corruption of Science has Impacted Public Perception and Policies Regarding Vaccines https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/subcommittees/investigations/hearings/how-the-corruption-of-science-has-impacted-public-perception-and-policies-regarding-vaccines/
*24: “Henry Ford Study” Zervos, et al “Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children A Birth Cohort Study” (2020, unpublished, in 9/09/25 Congressional Record) https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Entered-into-hearing-record-Impact-of-Childhood-Vaccination-on-Short-and-Long-Term-Chronic-Health-Outcomes-in-Children-A-Birth-Cohort-Study.pdf
Insinuating that it's innate, eh, therefore alleviating causation? or, simply put, chosing your words carefully. - "This suggests that in certain children, exposure to vaccination may increase the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition, particularly for one of these conditions."
Child sacrifice caused by poison in a needle to feed the machine.
I did not take that as an insinuation. Everyone is different and while some may be prone to vax injuries, others are not. I worked as a MA in pediatrics for 20 years. I administered many, many vaccines during that period. It was my training and I believed in the benefits of the regimen. I cannot point to any of MY patients having an immediate adverse reaction directly from vaccinations. My children received all their vaccines and thankfully did well. Did I see a general exponential increase of cases of Autism, ADHD, Obesity, and other disorders? Yes, I did. Did I correlate them solely with vaccinations? I did not because we have also been exposed to environmental chemicals and disrupters, radiation, ultra processed foods, laxed parenting (or lack of knowledge). There’s also the genetic makeup of each individual that may also be triggered. That said, in my last years I did more triage and had many conversations and there were the few that had concerns about vaccines causing certain issues in their children and wanting to halt or stagger vaccines… I think parents should not be forced to take vaccines for their children if they don’t want them. Protocols should be in place because inevitably people may get sick with some of these “childhood “ illnesses, but parents should have the choice and then be educated on other ways to keep children healthy. We don’t have enough children as it is and we certainly don’t want to see an increase of children dying before the age of 5 as it was 100-125 years ago.
How do you know children were not harmed. I was normal until the polio oral vaccine was given. I still have issues but no study done?
I didn’t say that. I said I didn’t witness any adverse effects from vaccines in any of the patients I personally took care of from infancy into adulthood, that includes my own children. I can also attest that I saw newborn babies that already had issues that later would be diagnosed as autism, pervasive developmental delays, and other neurodevelopmental issues. That could be for another number of reasons.
Shocking that when you see a physician 7 times per year (vaccinated group) they're more likely to diagnose a disease than when you see a physician only 2 times per year (unvaccinated group). The vaccinated group was also watched for twice as long (follow up time of approx 2.7 years in vaccinated vs 1.3 years in unvaccinated). More time = more opportunity for diagnosis.
That's just one confounder, not even addressing poor methods, unrecognized confounders, statistic implausibilities, decreased power of the smaller sample size in unvaccinated, attrition bias, etc. It's very easy to feed this *crap* to laypeople who don't have enough background knowledge to see through all of that.
A sensitivity analysis was performed to address exactly this confounder, yet the findings persisted.
"The study was reviewed and approved by HFHS’s Institutional Review Board and conducted in accordance with the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology’s Guidelines for Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practices"
This suggests the study was credible and properly executed. The CDC guidelines for studying safety of vaccines were followed "to the T," per the admission of the authors in a secret recording.
It makes me mental to know that this Dr Thomas lost his medical license over this, however many times I have heard it happen to other doctors . And to see this Dr Zervos wimp out to save his career. Not really caring about patients out there who might be affected by vaccines. There is a reign of terror out there by cruel and corrupt elites ,and they have managed to scare so many people, who got into that profession to heal. If you can't heal anymore with a clear conscience and to your satisfaction, get out and join the resistance!
And thanks to Del Bigtree for this documentary. OK, I have not seen it yet, so my thanks might be premature. But I have read a lot by him, perused his site, and I trust him. OK 2, I would not have spoken in front of a MAGA audience ( as I beleive he did) , and I would clearly keep my distance from them, while agreeing to temporarily cooperate , as I am doing in a very little way here.
It’s time to replace vaccines with something that is safe, effective and healthy.
I constantly hear that health officials are looking into new treatments for disease.
If they are truly committed to finding an alternative to vaccines and pharmaceuticals, ozone water must be considered.
I would like to suggest an unexplored preventative approach.
My approach centers around ozone infused water, which consists of the two things that the body can’t live without, oxygen and water.
Understanding the science.
Ozone comprises of 3 oxygen molecules that are loosely connected by an electric charge. Oxygen prefers to occupy space as a pair, so the 3rd oxygen molecule and its charge are easy removed by anything organic. This makes ozone a powerful oxidizer that will immediately destroy any virus or bacteria. As little as 5ppm of ozone will literally melt every virus and bacteria. incredibly. An example of oxidation is a fire place. Put wood in and ashes come out. Fire is a form of oxidation, it requires oxygen to burn.
When ozone is mixed with water the ozone will “burn” or oxidize organics and minerals dissolved in the water, yet be buffered by the water so that it is safe to drink or apply to the skin. Water acts as a transfer agent to safely direct ozone to any surface. This process will safely disinfect or even sterilize the water depending on the amount of ozone injected and the biological load in the water. Essentially ozone will improve any water quality. It will turn tap water into a powerful organic disinfectant - sterilizer. It will remove the odor from sewer water. It will naturally soften the water so scale does not build up in plumbing. Ozone oxidation alters the chemical composition of water so pathogens are oxidized and minerals are chelated.
The fact is that once ozone water can be enriched to the point of sterilization and the water will then sterilize anything that it touches. The caveat is that ozone water quickly releases the oxygen, so ozone water must be produced and used immediately to be most effective. When used immediately ozone water is the safest, most powerful disinfectant on earth. Ozone water can’t be bottled and sold off the shelf. This fact makes it unprofitable for companies selling health and wellness.
A new approach to health is organic, easy, inexpensive, and extremely effective.
Organic. The only ingredients are oxygen and water.
Easy. Simply make ozone water your drinking water, apply it to your skin, and inhale a fine mist of it.
Inexpensive. Portable ozone generators cost around $100 and last for years. Ozone faucets are on a par with Reverse Osmosis systems, however they have lights that indicate that they are working and don’t require annual maintenance.
Daily applications of ozone water will disinfect your body, mouth, throat and lungs. If applied daily ALL infectious disease will be prevented. This is a cure for the common cold, the flu, Covid, bird flu and all other diseases. I consider ozone water to be a “UNIVERSAL PANACEA “. This new approach is a simple plan to eliminate a vast majority of all diseases.
This is the only place I can find truthful research and results! Thank you
Who was the CEO of the HFHF during the time of this study? Was the CEO Wright Lassiter who now heads CommonSpirit?
Just as its true that MAHA derives from MAGA, it is equally true that An Inconvenient Study
originates from grifter Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth.
Studies are considered to be evidence. The Philosophy of Health "trumps" any study when comprehension is adequate. Researchers are unwilling to sacrifice their careers
for science and evidence until Conscience forces the hand usually at retirement as we see in this case.
The fork in the road? Getting people to believe that health comes from needles.
Quite the accomplishment.
I wouldn't be surprised if there was some deeper game going on here, and Zervos arranged to allow Bigtree to "covertly" record their conversation, for the very reasons stated in the recorded interview.