47 Comments
User's avatar
GenX1966's avatar

So its already been determined that Aluminium in deodorants and such is linked to Alzheimers but they want to study if it is safe for vaccines? How does this make sense?

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

Exactly. Just another diversion, and waste of our taxes. It’s ridiculous.

Expand full comment
Center Field's avatar

No diversion. Proper controlled studies, which were never performed by the former "controllers."

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

Have spent decades examining "proper controls"

Doctorate level.

The research industry has ALWAYS been pay to play.

The Data is uneqivocal.

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

You go on believing that. I don’t.

Expand full comment
Tee Rigodanzo's avatar

Great point. There is so much ignorance (victimhood?) in comments that it is difficult to address all.

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

The word ignorance means to ignore. That is exactly what academia and studies have accomplished. It is a dog chasing its tail. Doctorate level goons

deliberately obscure data to reflect desired outcomes.

Comment section is populated with exceptoins by people with lack of knowledge.

Expand full comment
Center Field's avatar

Please see my comment. Since controlled studies were NEVER done, they are being done now in order to have TRUE test data and not just wishful conjecture.

Expand full comment
thumpersillywabbit's avatar

Who's going to step up and be the guinea pig? Whose child?

Expand full comment
Tee Rigodanzo's avatar

Agreed. And for those who still don't get it . . . The CDC (our disease control leader?) never provided requested data because there was no required data/true data to provide.

Expand full comment
Suzanne's avatar

A vax specific aluminum study seems necessary to illustrate the extremely risky routine practices Big Pharma has engaged in for decades. To date, haven't all concerns been met with "safe and effective" pat response?

Expand full comment
Diana's avatar

Well, because it's not life threatening to have body odor, but vaccines are NECESSARY. Besides they are safe and effective, and every time you use them, a dying baby goes to heaven. Apologies. Before Covid I swear I was NEVER sarcastic.

Expand full comment
GenX1966's avatar

Aluminum in deodorant has been linked to Alzheimers (many documentaries on this). Aluminum full stop has been linked to Alzheimers so why would it be safe for vaccines? Like Ethyl-Mercury (Thimerosol) is safe because SOME OF the Mercury is processed through and out of body? Come on.

Expand full comment
Tee Rigodanzo's avatar

Yes, we are many things since the Plandemic . . . lets hope the best one is our search for truth & willingness to speak out for it . . . unlike the many damaged - or dead - by the lies.

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

It does not as you point out. And its deliberate.

Expand full comment
Tee Rigodanzo's avatar

In case you haven't been paying attention, many things (viruses, vaccines, etc) affect different age groups differently. How you could not want the best/gold standard science is beyond me. Here's hoping you/your family are never affected by some slipshod decisions that weren't properly 'studied' . . . btw there are 100+ types of dementia of which Alzheimer's is one.

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

Except that "virus" does not exist. Re-read as often as necessary.

You are advertising "types" of dementia. Clearly that is a dog chasing its tail.

We are not canines.

Expand full comment
Tee Rigodanzo's avatar

Sorry, I don't really understand your comment. Mine re: virus/vaccines was regarding both as affecting the young & old differently - had nothing to do with dementia.

As for my clarifying 100+ types of dementia was to refute the link between aluminum & Alzheimer's. While it may be true, folks with any type of dementia often get lumped into Alzheimer's which is a fallacy.

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

Oh, no. Not another study. We don’t need a study to tell us that aluminum shouldn’t be injected into humans. Stop it!

Expand full comment
LC Up's avatar

At last. True scientific research available to the public. A strange concept but one that works. I’m cheering you on.

Expand full comment
Willard Hall's avatar

...to paraphrase MLK: The arc of History is slow, but it moves in the direction of justice.

Expand full comment
Vicki Johnson's avatar

We were all Told to ditch our aluminum pans because of alzheimer’s risk - but let's inject the poison into our kids?

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

Actually you were correctly warned about aluminum bio accumuation in fatty tissue and the fact that the heavy metal crossed the blood brain barrier. As you point out it is patently insane. Thank the delivery boys, the Medical Doctors.

Expand full comment
First Amendment's avatar

Similarly to ethyl- vs. methyl-mercury, I can see MSM claiming that certain forms of aluminum are safe. It will be interesting to see if, when the truth comes out, the fact that aluminum has been in vaccines since the 1920's wakes people up.

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

Now the "discussion" is about which type is toxic or toxic-er.

The obfuscation is deliberate.

Methyl groups (CH3) are important detox agents for those in the know.

However shills at the WHO crow about the safety of Ethyl HG suggesting the "half life" is short.

As you allude waking up in this case is loss of confidence.

That is the domino effect.

Expand full comment
VN Alexander's avatar

Finally!

Expand full comment
Suzanne's avatar

Gee, finally serving WeThePeople instead of the CDC or AMA agendas! How many decades have citizens wanted these studies! It took MAGA/MAHA and so much grief from The Left to be able to move on the will of the People. When will the MARXISTS among us be commonly recognized?

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

Unfortunately med school does not require that doctors study nutrition, when 95% of health issues are created by what goes in the mouth. As someone who has been into nutrition and health research for 64 years and did 30 years of nutritional consultations, I have learned a bit about health. in 1930, there were just a few cases of autism...and they were connected to the Smallpox vaccine. Now, as someone who has studied the human body and how it functions. The bloodstream was designed to carry nutrients from unprocessed natural food. Mankind lived for eons of time on natural unprocessed food. The nutrients from food were carried to the organs, the glands and the cells to nourish them; creating energy and health. Lab-created substances in drugs and vaccines do not nourish the human body. They are poisonous to the organs, glands and cells. The only thing which belongs in the human bloodstream are nutrients from food.

Expand full comment
Valerie Blankenship's avatar

Well, let me save this. I teach herb classes and I have to say the students that attend my classes that are under 25 have learning problems. They may have jobs. They may be walking and talking and going to the bathroom, but they have learning problems, severe, ADHD, and inability to understand homework assignments. And an inability to keep up with homework. I’m sorry, but they’re brain damaged. It’s not their fault but it’s a sad truth. So we can dick around forever. But we need to wake up everyone around us. Is it OK to inject a baby with aluminum? And if you say OK yes it is well then. Is it OK to injection with more aluminum than the FDA says is safe?

Expand full comment
Guy Montag, E-451's avatar

“'Do either of the two different aluminum adjuvants increase the risk of asthma?' … A 2023 analysis by Daley et al. reported an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.19 to 1.26 for persistent asthma per 1 mg aluminum exposure before age two, with elevated risk in children with eczema.”

. . .

In their 2023 book, ” Vax-Unvax – Let the Science Speak,”*1 RFK Jr & Brian Hooker noted (p. 36) the rate of asthma went up by 1.36x to 1.61x when comparing children injected with < 3 mg AL vs > 3 mg AL.

In a 9/28/22 CHD article*2, Hooker “noted the CDC never did a comparison study with children who weren’t exposed to aluminum at all in their vaccines. 'A true comparison should be [done] between the maximum aluminum exposure at 2 years of age (which is about 4 mg total injected aluminum adjuvant) and a zero exposure group.' “

“He continued: “In the paper I did with Neil Miller (SAGE Open Medicine, 2020), we saw an odds ratio of 4.49 (statistically significant) for asthma in vaccinated children versus unvaccinated children. … “The CDC seems to be confirming my results here.”

It's worth noting that the Henry Ford Study*4 had similar results, with an IRR of 4.09x for asthma diagnoses (p. 16, Table 2) for children of all ages.

. . .

However, it appears that Hooker, and others, did NOT read Daley's Supplementary Data.*3

It appears to me that the Daley study*27 was close to being a Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed study. The group receiving 0 – 0.99 mg AL was largely unvaxxed (instead of counting the number of vaccines, they measured the amount of aluminum (mg AL) injected into children).

Supplementary Table 3 appears to shows a dose-response relationship; the rate of asthma rose from 1x to 4.00x as the amount of AL rises from (0 – 0.99) to 5 mg (with 4 mg being the avg injected into children). Supplementary Figure 3 shows the corresponding survival curves.

The effect size of 2.5x - 4 x are similar to those found by Hooker and Zervos. Much higher than the misleading “small effect size” of “1.26 per 1 mg increase in AL” described in Daley's abstract.

Am I interpreting the Supplementary Data correctly? It it possible that no one has noticed this before?

. . .

REFERENCES:

*1: https://www.amazon.com/Vax-Unvax-Childrens-Health-Defense-Kennedy/dp/1510766960

*2: Suzanne Burdick, Children's health Defense, “36% Higher Risk of Asthma in Some Kids Who Had Vaccine-Related Aluminum Exposure, CDC Study Shows” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/asthma-risk-kids-vaccine-aluminum-exposure-cdc-study/

*3: Supplementary data found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2022.08.006

*4: https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Siri-Testimony-1.pdf and

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Entered-into-hearing-record-Impact-of-Childhood-Vaccination-on-Short-and-Long-Term-Chronic-Health-Outcomes-in-Children-A-Birth-Cohort-Study.pdf

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

A dog doth chase its tail. It is actually very very simple.

Do not inject toxins. Beginning and end of graduate level course.

If people without knowledge about health, could comprehend that simple fact,

the discussion is absolutely un-necessary. Evidence convinced which fool???

Expand full comment
The Scam Doctor's avatar

Here’s the study that made RFK Jr concerned about aluminum: https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/how-to-cherry-pick-data-to-scam-people?r=6hgshq

Expand full comment
Irene Jacobi Kummer's avatar

Was autism nonexistent before Tylenol was invented?

Expand full comment
Mike Casey's avatar

It’s time to replace vaccines with something that is safe, effective and healthy.

I constantly hear that health officials are looking into new treatments for disease.

If they are truly committed to finding an alternative to vaccines and pharmaceuticals, ozone water must be considered.

I would like to suggest an unexplored preventative approach.

My approach centers around ozone infused water, which consists of the two things that the body can’t live without, oxygen and water.

Understanding the science.

Ozone comprises of 3 oxygen molecules that are loosely connected by an electric charge. Oxygen prefers to occupy space as a pair, so the 3rd oxygen molecule and its charge are easy removed by anything organic. This makes ozone a powerful oxidizer that will immediately destroy any virus or bacteria. As little as 5ppm of ozone will literally melt every virus and bacteria. incredibly. An example of oxidation is a fire place. Put wood in and ashes come out. Fire is a form of oxidation, it requires oxygen to burn.

When ozone is mixed with water the ozone will “burn” or oxidize organics and minerals dissolved in the water, yet be buffered by the water so that it is safe to drink or apply to the skin. Water acts as a transfer agent to safely direct ozone to any surface. This process will safely disinfect or even sterilize the water depending on the amount of ozone injected and the biological load in the water. Essentially ozone will improve any water quality. It will turn tap water into a powerful organic disinfectant - sterilizer. It will remove the odor from sewer water. It will naturally soften the water so scale does not build up in plumbing. Ozone oxidation alters the chemical composition of water so pathogens are oxidized and minerals are chelated.

The fact is that once ozone water can be enriched to the point of sterilization and the water will then sterilize anything that it touches. The caveat is that ozone water quickly releases the oxygen, so ozone water must be produced and used immediately to be most effective. When used immediately ozone water is the safest, most powerful disinfectant on earth. Ozone water can’t be bottled and sold off the shelf. This fact makes it unprofitable for companies selling health and wellness.

A new approach to health is organic, easy, inexpensive, and extremely effective.

Organic. The only ingredients are oxygen and water.

Easy. Simply make ozone water your drinking water, apply it to your skin, and inhale a fine mist of it.

Inexpensive. Portable ozone generators cost around $100 and last for years. Ozone faucets are on a par with Reverse Osmosis systems, however they have lights that indicate that they are working and don’t require annual maintenance.

Daily applications of ozone water will disinfect your body, mouth, throat and lungs. If applied daily ALL infectious disease will be prevented. This is a cure for the common cold, the flu, Covid, bird flu and all other diseases. I consider ozone water to be a “UNIVERSAL PANACEA “. This new approach is a simple plan to eliminate a vast majority of all diseases.

Expand full comment
Andrew lawson's avatar

Many commonly used

anti acid tablets also contain aluminium, but only if you read the small print on the box!!!

Health conscious people have thrown out their aluminium saucepans.

It is a deadly mineral to the brain.

Expand full comment
David 1260's avatar

You are a hero of mine, Dr. Jack.

Expand full comment