35 Comments
User's avatar
Michelle's avatar

Praise God...now keep ANY and ALL mRNA out of ALL vaccines!!!! We're not stupid and all of Secretary Kennedy's work is in vein if he allows mRNA to be put in any vaccines.

Expand full comment
David 1260's avatar

This is incorrect: " it can only be done following consultation with a physician." ACIP called for a consult with a healthcare provider, which several members stressed includes pharmacists.

The vote on requiring prescriptions was 6-6, with the Chair's No vote deciding the tie.

There was tremendous pushback from industry and its shills. Some commenters called the Kuperwasser peer-reviewed report on potential harms to be preliminary and unreliable.

Perhaps the most important takeaway was Levi stating that "safe and effective" is not a science-based statement. It can't be evaluated adequately.

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

I don’t understand why Dr. Malone said they have to study. Hep B vaccines more! The statistics indicate that only one percent of the infants born are at risk for hep B. Consequently, it should be the attending physician’s decision as to who should be injected with the vaccine..Didn’t Merck hire the physician who Shepherd their vaccine through the FDA jump ship and work for Merck running their vaccine program for $1 million a year. If I got it wrong let me know.! Should be stopping the mandates and not reinforcing them

Expand full comment
Diane Cox's avatar

If …….Taking mRNA vaccines carries such risks as weakening patients’ immune systems, causing tumors to grow, and creating deadly cardiac conditions.

Then why would it be recommended for those with MS , diabetes, or anyone with weak immune systems ?

Expand full comment
Prometheus Sputnik's avatar

Is it not obvious? Because they want to kill or make people sick for profit and globalist agendas.

Expand full comment
SteffiLovesLucy's avatar

That’s what enrages me as well. Immunocompromised individuals should NOT be getting any vaccines. Thank God my pediatrician advised against all vaccines for my kid after she was vaccine injured and developed ITP. My cat now is immunocompromised and vet recommended no more jabs. The poor creature is on immunosuppression drugs.

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Selling hope for money!

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

The community physician should be the decision-maker and there should be no mandates on medical treatment being forwarded to the state states from the federal government!

Expand full comment
Jane Tracy's avatar

I agree with you but there needs to be a better education for the community physicians regarding vaccine risks/benefits to allow the patient truly make an informed choice!

Expand full comment
TerriM's avatar

They can't do this because of liability. Doctors are not liable if they hurt a patient with a vaccine, but they can be if they don't recommend the vaccine and the patient is hurt by the illness that it causes. Until there's equal liability (either neither direction or both directions), doctors will recommend vaccines that people don't need "just in case"

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun's avatar

Manipulated legality to push vaccines! Never knew this angle!

Expand full comment
TerriM's avatar

Yeah. You can thank the 1986 National Vaccine Injury Act for this. Yet another reason it should be overturned.

Expand full comment
rtko's avatar

Thank you to everyone who fought for this, for everyone who was persecuted for taking a stand and to everyone who listened.

Expand full comment
Prometheus Sputnik's avatar

Its crazy this bioweapon are still being put in people!! And no one has been punished for the crimes against humanity!

Expand full comment
Tom Kudla's avatar

After reading this report (substack post) regarding the covid vax, I not sure exactly what has now changed -- as a result of ACIP's meeting:

ref: "Friday, in a unanimous decision, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted against recommending new Covid vaccines for the general public. The new guidance is broadly similar for children, adults, and seniors. /// The ACIP now recommends that while everyone, including children over 6 months old, can still obtain a Covid vaccine, it can only be done following consultation with a physician. In a 7-6 vote, the ACIP decided against a related proposal that would have required a formal prescription for a Covid vaccine. /// The ACIP committee also recommended that people with underlying conditions take the vaccines based on their personal needs – or, in the words of the committee, 'individual based decision-making.'"

* "new Covid vaccines"? is that a booster?

* does "consultation with a physician without a Prescription" produce a document? that the Chain-pharmacy would require? BTW, are covid vaccines even administered in doctor offices? in hospitals?

I'm anti-vax. I just curious about learning more about the incremental step(s) they took today on the covid vax.

Expand full comment
Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

Now, the quest begins to sue big pharma for breaking the rules that allowed them emergency use authorization for Covid injections.

"To support an EUA request, vaccine manufacturers must submit comprehensive data, including results from large-scale clinical trials involving tens of thousands of participants to assess safety and effectiveness.

Specifically, the FDA expects phase 3 trial data with a median follow-up of at least two months after vaccination for at least half of participants, and a safety database of over 3,000 recipients monitored for at least one month post-vaccination.

The submission must also include chemistry, manufacturing, and controls information to ensure product quality and consistency

For a vaccine to receive an EUA, the FDA must determine that the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks based on the totality of scientific evidence available.

This evaluation includes comprehensive assessment of clinical trial data, manufacturing processes, and chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) information to ensure product consistency and quality."

Pharma committed fraud.

Expand full comment
Always_Ask_Why's avatar

and! Pfizer and Moderna : big pharma of mRNA vax et all they need to be prosecuted as such— not just a timid slap on the hands!

There were no phase 3 clinical trials at the time of “a shot in every arm” was being ‘mandated’, or lose your job. The world was the “phase lll/lV clinical trial and they knew where they sent the “hot lots” and also where they sent “placebos/saline”. (They just didn’t tell anyone outside the company). Oh, and don’t forget then they actually acted as if they were conducting the clinical trials: but whoopsies let’s vax our placebo/control group: which actually invalidated any and all of their ‘clinical trials’!

Aaand lastly: as the vax was being “warp speeded”out, they mfg them and needed the vials of vax kept at “ultra freezer” temps.( IE at -25 to -50 degrees F) whoopsies! clinics/hospitals don’t use those! oops ok well 0*C or 32 F or below will be just fine….”trust the science…trust us” 😡 Some of us paid close attention, read the data & understood it and aren’t as stupid as “they” hoped… & yes we still remember it all very clearly!

Expand full comment
Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

Don't forget that there were no guidelines for injection site protocol except to inject into the deltoid muscle

No one was told to "aspirate" (pulling body fluid out to check for heavy blood color) the hypodermics before shooting the mRNA compound into the muscle, there by allowing some injections to be mainlined into the blood stream where they went throughout the body. Germany recommended aspiration after animal studies, which should have been a requirement for all jabs everywhere.

Again...the former CDC ACIP committee and the WHO as well as these so-called pharma experts let us down.

Expand full comment
Deanna Weeks's avatar

Trump still supports the cv shot and believes in the data he’s being given by Pfizer. Trump can’t be this blind and deaf to We The People.

Expand full comment
Kim F's avatar

Do you have proof of this? Just curious because I have not seen anything that says Trump is pro Covid shot. And he praises Bobby all the time.

Expand full comment
Owlshead5's avatar

He's been changing his mind. He was manipulated by the Master Manipulator Fauci. He isn't too proud to change his mind.

Expand full comment
Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

Who nominated RFK Jr.?????

Expand full comment
Keith Jajko's avatar

Just ... wow. Solid work for a first session. 👏👏👏

Expand full comment
Loraine's avatar

Way to go Warriors of Health for All People!!!.....Heartfelt Thanks for your selfless drive to keep people Healthy!!⭐🎉🎯✨♥️🙏

We all know that is actually the purpose of government agencies. They should be ashamed they vered So Far Away from Their Mandate and for what purpose? I wonder how they can sleep or even live with themselves......

Expand full comment
Daniel Murphy's avatar

I suspect they’re either drunks or sociopaths.

Expand full comment
Deanna Weeks's avatar

Who was the Pfizer rep?

Expand full comment
Gary Saber's avatar

IF MALONE SAID THAT THE HEP VACCINES 'NEED TO BE STUDIED MORE', THEN HE NEEDS TO BE STUDIED MORE.

Expand full comment
Dave Campbell's avatar

The dam is breached!

Expand full comment
Michael LeVesque's avatar

It is interesting that back in 2022 the FDA Advisory panel had recommended that no further vaccines ("counter measure") be administered without clinical trials. The FDA then adopted "future framework" that stated all reformulated COVID-19 injections be released without clinical trials. This was unheard of and done surreptitiously. Let me repeat there will be no clinical trials! Statistics indicate that with each booster the risks of grave harm increase.

What needs to be made public is that they are not vaccines. They are a genetically modified organism injected as an experiment authorized by the Patriot Act of 2001 as an emergency military counter measure protected by the PREP act of 2005.

People need to start publishing the VAERS in detail and alert the public as a humane, prudent, and economic consideration.

The PREP Act of 2001 set forth certain conditions. It is a legislative act the has protected the pharmaceutical industry and was created by its lobbying power. The PREP Act provides immunity from suit and liability under Federal and State law, approves forced medication and vaccination countermeasures, and denies Informed Consent (a Rule of Law). Next to nothing has been paid by the government to people whose families suffered death and harm.

The most recent destruction of medical freedom is a new rule effective January 23rd, 2024, not to require Informed Consent.  Certified Government Publishing Office 88228 - hopefully this will be rescinded.

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

Lotsa experts. Wowser. Howz bout this: None are safe, none are effective / All are harmful, some genocidal Evidence convinced which fool?? (hint) nary a fool

Lets slow walk the obvious. If 25 years ago all would have been banned it would have been seriously tardy. And here we are...

Expand full comment
Jen Berman Diaz's avatar

👏👏

Expand full comment