I would love to see health insurance to allow alternative treatments not just the standard primary care physician model. Also dentistry is very important for overall health. Biological dentistry would be another welcome having more coverage through health/dental insurance. Health insurance should not be a one size fits all.
I totally agree with Betty, and would only add that acupuncture, naturopathic, prolo therapy, have been used for sooo long, that they should not be considered alternative. And all the money they took from my paycheck for Medicare, I/we should have the benefit of choosing who we want to help us with our health care. Thank you 🙏 Patrick
I agree with Betty, alternative treatments that have been suppressed needs to be high lighted not left in the grey zones of medicine. Especially if they are low cost to us the American people.
As a registered nurse who has worked in a hospital for 30 years I have seen the problem of healthcare first hand. The biggest issues I have seen over the years that has caused a decline in care are: hospitals buying out private practices, surgical centers, and testing facilities and placing them under their tax sheltered umbrella thus controlling all the policies and de-incentivizing doctors to think independently and to only follow policy. We need to break up these large corporatized conglomerates and get back to independent practices. Where I live there is zero free market in healthcare bc every doctor is part of one giant “health system”. The other big problems is the hospitals have become metric driven and not concerned with individual outcomes. This is due to CME reimbursement tha requires specific things to be eligible for reimbursement and that needs to change. Cookie cutter treatment plans with no room for deviation will not result in healthier people. What works for one person may not for others and since we are all individual human beings we should be treated as such. Doctors and hospitals should be rewarded on outcomes not bc they managed to get people to take a pneumonia vaccine or flu vaccine that doesn’t work and may not even be in their best interest. Over the last 30 years people have gotten sicker and the care they receive has gotten worse and has, in fact, completely lost sight of the patient who has been replaced by metrics and policy, all to the patient’s detriment. I would love more information on getting involved to help make necessary changes to make healthcare turn around.
"hospitals buying out private practices, surgical centers, and testing facilities..." -- AND now we have private equity firms buying out the hospitals; the focus of which is on increasing profits for shareholders instead of providing quality patient care. It's all such a RACKET.
Creating a critical scientific paradigm that includes both long/short term implications of artificial biological chemistry, like mRNA and synthetic chemicals, would quickly show our current path of technocratic biological solutions for healthcare are destroying the foundations of human biology and life on this planet. Unfortunately, much like politics, paradigm change cannot occur quick enough to undo all the damage we've done to our environment and health, unless enacted immediately. I hope this Maha approach to healthcare science will include ecological science as a critical, integrative part of biotech research
I too am in total agreement with both Betty and Patrick and have even thought of going before congress . my husband got the cancer for
Round up because of the money situation. He chose to do the conventional chemo, which then gave him leukemia. They and her age was the one who suggested he get a bowel transplant in the preparation of that it almost killed him it actually did. He died twice in an hour and a half he came back and actually got held him. The leukemia left after 42 days in a coma with them thinking he would die. He now has bad neuropathy, even though he goes to work because we have to I believe if he had done a different treatment early on or if they had been no glyphosate and round up, none of this would’ve happened.
"soon-to-be-built, Real World Data Platform, allowing independent scientists to analyze federal health datasets" Track and Trace digital health panopticon?
The rest of that sentence states: "while maintaining strict patient privacy." It's my understanding that datasets don't include individual patient personal information.
I would love to see health insurance to allow alternative treatments not just the standard primary care physician model. Also dentistry is very important for overall health. Biological dentistry would be another welcome having more coverage through health/dental insurance. Health insurance should not be a one size fits all.
I totally agree with Betty, and would only add that acupuncture, naturopathic, prolo therapy, have been used for sooo long, that they should not be considered alternative. And all the money they took from my paycheck for Medicare, I/we should have the benefit of choosing who we want to help us with our health care. Thank you 🙏 Patrick
Thank God Dr Bhattacharya is in charge of NIH. His policies can really make a substantial difference.
Thank you Jesus!
I agree with Betty, alternative treatments that have been suppressed needs to be high lighted not left in the grey zones of medicine. Especially if they are low cost to us the American people.
As a registered nurse who has worked in a hospital for 30 years I have seen the problem of healthcare first hand. The biggest issues I have seen over the years that has caused a decline in care are: hospitals buying out private practices, surgical centers, and testing facilities and placing them under their tax sheltered umbrella thus controlling all the policies and de-incentivizing doctors to think independently and to only follow policy. We need to break up these large corporatized conglomerates and get back to independent practices. Where I live there is zero free market in healthcare bc every doctor is part of one giant “health system”. The other big problems is the hospitals have become metric driven and not concerned with individual outcomes. This is due to CME reimbursement tha requires specific things to be eligible for reimbursement and that needs to change. Cookie cutter treatment plans with no room for deviation will not result in healthier people. What works for one person may not for others and since we are all individual human beings we should be treated as such. Doctors and hospitals should be rewarded on outcomes not bc they managed to get people to take a pneumonia vaccine or flu vaccine that doesn’t work and may not even be in their best interest. Over the last 30 years people have gotten sicker and the care they receive has gotten worse and has, in fact, completely lost sight of the patient who has been replaced by metrics and policy, all to the patient’s detriment. I would love more information on getting involved to help make necessary changes to make healthcare turn around.
"hospitals buying out private practices, surgical centers, and testing facilities..." -- AND now we have private equity firms buying out the hospitals; the focus of which is on increasing profits for shareholders instead of providing quality patient care. It's all such a RACKET.
Correction to above
It was the NIH who suggested Kevin needed a bone marrow transplant and after preparing for it caused him to get deathly sick .
God actually healed him . The dr’s admitted it . The lukuemia was gone before he left the Hospital .
I hope this appropriate initiative is not derailed by vested-interests.
Creating a critical scientific paradigm that includes both long/short term implications of artificial biological chemistry, like mRNA and synthetic chemicals, would quickly show our current path of technocratic biological solutions for healthcare are destroying the foundations of human biology and life on this planet. Unfortunately, much like politics, paradigm change cannot occur quick enough to undo all the damage we've done to our environment and health, unless enacted immediately. I hope this Maha approach to healthcare science will include ecological science as a critical, integrative part of biotech research
Good stuff. I especially love the democratized data access.
I too am in total agreement with both Betty and Patrick and have even thought of going before congress . my husband got the cancer for
Round up because of the money situation. He chose to do the conventional chemo, which then gave him leukemia. They and her age was the one who suggested he get a bowel transplant in the preparation of that it almost killed him it actually did. He died twice in an hour and a half he came back and actually got held him. The leukemia left after 42 days in a coma with them thinking he would die. He now has bad neuropathy, even though he goes to work because we have to I believe if he had done a different treatment early on or if they had been no glyphosate and round up, none of this would’ve happened.
Are they going to do away with GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe)?
Please provide link to this important roundtable discussion
“Reclaiming Science: The People’s NIH,”
Thank you.
Michelle Rabin, Ph.D.
How do we access video of this meeting?
"soon-to-be-built, Real World Data Platform, allowing independent scientists to analyze federal health datasets" Track and Trace digital health panopticon?
The rest of that sentence states: "while maintaining strict patient privacy." It's my understanding that datasets don't include individual patient personal information.