What about the basic obligation for valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination?
The vaccinators should be thrown under the bus, because they are the ones sticking the needles in arms, and it is their PERSONAL obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent, which isn't possible for vaccination administered under mis/disinformation from 'the authorities', pressure, coercion, manipulation and MANDATES.
The ACIP, the members of which are generally medical doctors, approves vaccine products that often go on to be mandated by the states and other entities.
How has this been allowed to happen?
As medical doctors, surely these people know that voluntary informed consent must be obtained for medical interventions, including vaccination?
And yet vaccines have been mandated for years in the US, and other countries such as Australia - how could medical doctors collaborate with mandated medical interventions?
Vaccines have been mandated for children, for military recruits, for medical practitioners themselves, as well as others, e.g. mass populations during 'Covid'.
Again, how has this been allowed to happen?
The upshot now is that anyone who has submitted to vaccination under mandates, under threats, under pressure, under coercion, under manipulation, under incentivisation, under mis/disinformation from 'the authorities', has not given valid voluntary informed consent to the intervention.
Just think about that...
I contend that NO-ONE has given valid consent for vaccination under these circumstances, with vaccinators violating their obligation to obtain voluntary informed consent for vaccination, collaborating with the trashing of valid consent.
What is this going to mean when the penny drops?
NO VALID CONSENT...
Who is going to bear the responsibility?
Secretary Kennedy, you must address this disastrous situation which has its roots in the failure of the members of the ACIP, the medical doctors, to raise the alarm about the destruction of valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination under mandates.
I request your urgent response on this matter, which has serious implications not only for the United States, but for any country in which vaccine mandates have been imposed upon the population.
Yours sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the vaccine industry and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
Thank you. I believe he has spoken of the importance of this under the Gold Standard concept. But I can't keep up with all the latest. Again thank you for your letter.
It is my understanding that it was required for the CDC to recommend a vaccine IF it was to be covered by insurance. It also must be on the Childhood vaccination schedule to receive liability protection. Is that correct? If so, won't these states be putting their residents at risk regarding insurance reimbursement? Also, will they now have the option to sue their physician who failed to go along with the CDC requirements should they experience a vaccine injury? I know California provided stated protection however but I haven't read that other states did so as well. I think it would be important for Secretary Kennedy to make a PSA informing the public of this matter stating that the risk/benefit analysis shows healthy infants, children and adults under 65 have a greater risk of harm than benefit. Any physician giving a vaccine to this population would not be providing informed consent to their patients. I imagine it would be unlikely for anyone to take a vaccines when they're told the risk to do so is greater than the benefit. Posting on X or the HHS website will NOT reach the majority of democrats. It must go over ALL mainstream media outlets.
Don't you think it would be help for Secretary Kennedy to make a public service announcement about these issues as obviously, people are being misinformed? Why do you suppose he hasn't?
Okay, this is going to sound hateful and cruel, but unfortunately I think it may be true. If most of the people in blue states vaccinate and get flu shots, and most of the people in red states don’t, then wouldn’t that be sort of like a study? I hate to see all these vaxx obsessed people harming their children, but wouldn’t the results in the coming years be pretty clear?
I predict this natural experiment will reveal the harms of vaccines by increased prevalence of chronic illnesses and neurological disorders among the states with aggressive vaccine schedules. Sadly the innocent children will pay the price.
I appreciate the intent to question and improve public health policy, but this article leans heavily on claims that conflict with well-established science, while glossing over serious flaws in the MAHA framework. Below are key issues and clarifications grounded in current evidence:
First, the MAHA report has been shown to include citations to studies that do not exist, as well as misrepresentations of real ones.  Experts have flagged markers like “oaicite” (linked to AI-generated references) and repeated footnotes as evidence that parts of it may have been generated with weak verification.  This undermines its use as a reliable foundation for sweeping policy shifts.
Second, on vaccines: The bulk of scientific evidence supports that vaccines are overwhelmingly safe and effective, and that vaccines do not cause autism.  Investigations found no credible evidence that vaccine-advisory committees are compromised by industry interests.  When Kennedy claims that these bodies are beholden to industry, he is making an assertion for which independent analyses (so far) do not support his conclusions.
Third, the report’s methodology shows signs of confirmation bias and post hoc reasoning: it begins with a conclusion (that chronic disease is rising primarily because of diet, environment, “corporate capture”), then seeks selective data to support it.  Strong science starts with hypotheses tested in rigorous, transparent studies — not vice versa.
Finally, policy proposals that significantly deviate from consensus must carry heavy evidentiary burden. In this case, that burden is unmet. Replacing or undermining robust systems (for vaccine safety monitoring, regulatory review, expert advisory bodies) based on flawed reports risks serious public health consequences.
If this article wants to persuade, it should (1) acknowledge uncertainty, (2) openly engage counterevidence, and (3) base any proposed reforms on strong, replicable science — not dramatic rhetoric.
The article doesn't rely on the MAHA Commission Report. It relies on CDC data (links included) that show Covid is not killing anyone and has become less dangerous. It was never dangerous to healthy children -- but the shots were! If you really want to know about the lies about vaccines, read Forbidden Truths by Gavin de Becker:
I appreciate your reply, but the evidence doesn’t support those conclusions.
1️⃣ CDC data do not show that “COVID isn’t killing anyone.” The agency’s provisional mortality data (through 2025) still record thousands of U.S. deaths annually from or with COVID-19. The infection-fatality rate has indeed dropped — mainly thanks to prior immunity and better treatments — but that doesn’t mean the virus is harmless. “Less dangerous” ≠ “not dangerous.”
2️⃣ Regarding children: CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics data confirm that COVID mortality among healthy children is low but non-zero — higher than many other vaccine-preventable diseases such as varicella or rotavirus before their vaccines were introduced. Pediatric hospitalizations peaked at several thousand per week during Omicron waves. “Low risk” is not “no risk.”
3️⃣ On vaccines: Large peer-reviewed studies in The New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, and The Lancet show that mRNA vaccines significantly reduce hospitalization and death risk without causing excess severe adverse events. The most common side effects are short-term fatigue and injection-site soreness. Serious outcomes like myocarditis are rare (roughly 1–5 per 100,000 doses), and in nearly all cases resolve with standard treatment. By contrast, myocarditis risk from COVID infection itself is higher.
4️⃣ About Forbidden Truths: That book is not a peer-reviewed scientific source; it’s a polemic written by a security consultant, not an epidemiologist. It does not provide original data nor pass scientific reproducibility standards.
If you’re genuinely interested in reviewing the underlying data, I’d encourage starting with the CDC’s COVID-NET hospitalization surveillance and the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report archives — both publicly available and transparently sourced. Science welcomes skepticism, but claims should match the quality of evidence offered.
Bottom line: COVID’s risk has diminished, vaccines have saved millions of lives, and scientific rigor — not selective interpretation — remains our best tool for truth.
"At the September 9 hearing before the United States Senate ... Attorney Aaron Siri ... highlighted a ... “The Henry Ford study found that vaccinated children had a statistically significant increased rate of various serious chronic diseases"
. . .
This Sunday, Oct 12th at 8 pm EST, ICAN will premiere their documentary "An Inconvenient Study." Their film includes hidden camera footage of the lead author Dr. Zervos that contradicts Henry Ford Health's claims that his study was not published because of "flawed data and methodology." e.g. “I'd put it out just as it is ... [But] publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I'd be finished."
Here's the links to see the trailer, read the study, and read Siri's written testimony for yourself:
In the UK we never had mandatory childhood vaccination, it was understood people had bodily autonomy. The US use of mandates is a sign of regulatory capture and industry control over citizens freedoms.
With the covid scam this changed. these totalitarian mandates come from the US.
I was kicked out of the Evanston, Illinois YMCA for refusing to ANSWER whether I was vaccinated or not. Specifically, they asked everyone to show their vaccine card, and would establish a QR code to scan in to the Y.
In fact, I WAS vaccinated, as I got the first 2 shots out of fear and ignorance. I was just insulted by their demanding I prove it.
What is more amazing is that no one in Blue America thinks that is outrageous or has since reflected on it and made any amends.
I understand early on when everyone was terrified, but after one year it was evident that it was a scam, a hoax.
The most overlooked part is how it was manipulated to determine the election results, first to cheat Sanderss and second to cheat Trump.
Let the blue states go. Let them continue to jab. It has been 5 years now and they refuse to debate, reason or use critical thinking skills to even consider the dangers. They will depopulate themselves sad to say but that is their choice. With melancholy, perhaps it is better this occurs as rabid fanatics like this are not of benefit to society as a whole.
‘The science backs up the Trump - Kennedy approach.. ‘ HA! 🤣this article is complete propaganda BS. Remember when they fired all the scientists and replaced the with right wing bible humpers. There is no science behind this wack Job. I wish Americans could make it past high school, and religion was not the only thing to latch onto out in the country. Applebees, WallMart, football (which is just a modern form of a plantation). It’s a sad life y’all. I feel bad for most of you, sorry your life just didn’t amount to more than this. Sorry you are regulated to this nonsense. But good luck this winter. Most of the blue states will be vaccinated enough for herd immunity and have hospitals fully staffed. If there are enough Covid related rural deaths.. I wonder what history will call this winter.
Ha! You can have my jab, shill. You are laughable in your prideful ignorance. Remember when the mRNA shots didn't work, and those of us who didn't get them didn't get Covid while those who took them did? Was that you, Peter? lol Did you even read the piece, and the current CDC data? No one is dying of Covid, and your fearmongering is pathetic.
I get that emotions still run high on this topic, but let’s try to separate frustration from evidence.
1️⃣ Vaccination and infection rates: Many vaccinated people did get COVID — but that was never the promise. The purpose of the mRNA vaccines was to reduce severe illness, hospitalization, and death. The data show they did exactly that. CDC, Johns Hopkins, and Yale studies consistently found hospitalization rates were 5–10× lower among vaccinated adults during Delta and Omicron waves. That’s measurable protection, not a failure.
2️⃣ “No one is dying of COVID” — that’s simply untrue. The CDC’s provisional 2024 mortality report shows roughly 60,000 U.S. deaths where COVID was the underlying or contributing cause. That’s lower than the 350,000 peak years, yes, but it’s hardly “no one.” Saying “no one” ignores the immunocompromised, elderly, and those with underlying lung or cardiac disease who remain at risk.
3️⃣ “Unvaccinated didn’t get it” — that’s anecdote, not data. Random chance, behavior (masking, travel, crowd exposure), and prior infection history all play roles. Broad population data show unvaccinated people were more likely to test positive, be hospitalized, and die of COVID, across age groups.
4️⃣ Fearmongering vs. humility: Wanting accurate numbers isn’t fear — it’s responsibility. Science isn’t pride; it’s process. I did read the piece and the CDC data, and they don’t say what the article claims. The numbers show COVID’s risk has dropped, not vanished.
We can disagree politically, but facts don’t bend with opinion. Evidence still matters — even when it’s inconvenient.
What about the basic obligation for valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination?
The vaccinators should be thrown under the bus, because they are the ones sticking the needles in arms, and it is their PERSONAL obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent, which isn't possible for vaccination administered under mis/disinformation from 'the authorities', pressure, coercion, manipulation and MANDATES.
So there is NO VALID CONSENT.
I've written to HHS Secretary on this matter, an email dated 16 September 2025, also accessible via this link: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/theres-no-valid-consent-for-vaccination-under-mandates.pdf
QUOTE
Dear Secretary Kennedy
The ACIP, the members of which are generally medical doctors, approves vaccine products that often go on to be mandated by the states and other entities.
How has this been allowed to happen?
As medical doctors, surely these people know that voluntary informed consent must be obtained for medical interventions, including vaccination?
And yet vaccines have been mandated for years in the US, and other countries such as Australia - how could medical doctors collaborate with mandated medical interventions?
Vaccines have been mandated for children, for military recruits, for medical practitioners themselves, as well as others, e.g. mass populations during 'Covid'.
Again, how has this been allowed to happen?
The upshot now is that anyone who has submitted to vaccination under mandates, under threats, under pressure, under coercion, under manipulation, under incentivisation, under mis/disinformation from 'the authorities', has not given valid voluntary informed consent to the intervention.
Just think about that...
I contend that NO-ONE has given valid consent for vaccination under these circumstances, with vaccinators violating their obligation to obtain voluntary informed consent for vaccination, collaborating with the trashing of valid consent.
What is this going to mean when the penny drops?
NO VALID CONSENT...
Who is going to bear the responsibility?
Secretary Kennedy, you must address this disastrous situation which has its roots in the failure of the members of the ACIP, the medical doctors, to raise the alarm about the destruction of valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination under mandates.
I request your urgent response on this matter, which has serious implications not only for the United States, but for any country in which vaccine mandates have been imposed upon the population.
Yours sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the vaccine industry and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net
elizabethhart.substack.com
Thank you. I believe he has spoken of the importance of this under the Gold Standard concept. But I can't keep up with all the latest. Again thank you for your letter.
You can’t fix stupid
May the consciousness of the leaders and followers of blue be elevated and awakened. No more fear.
The only thing that has gotten worse in Trump’s second term is the democrat’s behavior!
It is my understanding that it was required for the CDC to recommend a vaccine IF it was to be covered by insurance. It also must be on the Childhood vaccination schedule to receive liability protection. Is that correct? If so, won't these states be putting their residents at risk regarding insurance reimbursement? Also, will they now have the option to sue their physician who failed to go along with the CDC requirements should they experience a vaccine injury? I know California provided stated protection however but I haven't read that other states did so as well. I think it would be important for Secretary Kennedy to make a PSA informing the public of this matter stating that the risk/benefit analysis shows healthy infants, children and adults under 65 have a greater risk of harm than benefit. Any physician giving a vaccine to this population would not be providing informed consent to their patients. I imagine it would be unlikely for anyone to take a vaccines when they're told the risk to do so is greater than the benefit. Posting on X or the HHS website will NOT reach the majority of democrats. It must go over ALL mainstream media outlets.
I was wondering this too. What about liability protection that is a federal policy?
The states still have immunity under the PREP Act -- which they shouldn't!
Don't you think it would be help for Secretary Kennedy to make a public service announcement about these issues as obviously, people are being misinformed? Why do you suppose he hasn't?
Okay, this is going to sound hateful and cruel, but unfortunately I think it may be true. If most of the people in blue states vaccinate and get flu shots, and most of the people in red states don’t, then wouldn’t that be sort of like a study? I hate to see all these vaxx obsessed people harming their children, but wouldn’t the results in the coming years be pretty clear?
I predict this natural experiment will reveal the harms of vaccines by increased prevalence of chronic illnesses and neurological disorders among the states with aggressive vaccine schedules. Sadly the innocent children will pay the price.
I appreciate the intent to question and improve public health policy, but this article leans heavily on claims that conflict with well-established science, while glossing over serious flaws in the MAHA framework. Below are key issues and clarifications grounded in current evidence:
First, the MAHA report has been shown to include citations to studies that do not exist, as well as misrepresentations of real ones.  Experts have flagged markers like “oaicite” (linked to AI-generated references) and repeated footnotes as evidence that parts of it may have been generated with weak verification.  This undermines its use as a reliable foundation for sweeping policy shifts.
Second, on vaccines: The bulk of scientific evidence supports that vaccines are overwhelmingly safe and effective, and that vaccines do not cause autism.  Investigations found no credible evidence that vaccine-advisory committees are compromised by industry interests.  When Kennedy claims that these bodies are beholden to industry, he is making an assertion for which independent analyses (so far) do not support his conclusions.
Third, the report’s methodology shows signs of confirmation bias and post hoc reasoning: it begins with a conclusion (that chronic disease is rising primarily because of diet, environment, “corporate capture”), then seeks selective data to support it.  Strong science starts with hypotheses tested in rigorous, transparent studies — not vice versa.
Finally, policy proposals that significantly deviate from consensus must carry heavy evidentiary burden. In this case, that burden is unmet. Replacing or undermining robust systems (for vaccine safety monitoring, regulatory review, expert advisory bodies) based on flawed reports risks serious public health consequences.
If this article wants to persuade, it should (1) acknowledge uncertainty, (2) openly engage counterevidence, and (3) base any proposed reforms on strong, replicable science — not dramatic rhetoric.
The article doesn't rely on the MAHA Commission Report. It relies on CDC data (links included) that show Covid is not killing anyone and has become less dangerous. It was never dangerous to healthy children -- but the shots were! If you really want to know about the lies about vaccines, read Forbidden Truths by Gavin de Becker:
I appreciate your reply, but the evidence doesn’t support those conclusions.
1️⃣ CDC data do not show that “COVID isn’t killing anyone.” The agency’s provisional mortality data (through 2025) still record thousands of U.S. deaths annually from or with COVID-19. The infection-fatality rate has indeed dropped — mainly thanks to prior immunity and better treatments — but that doesn’t mean the virus is harmless. “Less dangerous” ≠ “not dangerous.”
2️⃣ Regarding children: CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics data confirm that COVID mortality among healthy children is low but non-zero — higher than many other vaccine-preventable diseases such as varicella or rotavirus before their vaccines were introduced. Pediatric hospitalizations peaked at several thousand per week during Omicron waves. “Low risk” is not “no risk.”
3️⃣ On vaccines: Large peer-reviewed studies in The New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, and The Lancet show that mRNA vaccines significantly reduce hospitalization and death risk without causing excess severe adverse events. The most common side effects are short-term fatigue and injection-site soreness. Serious outcomes like myocarditis are rare (roughly 1–5 per 100,000 doses), and in nearly all cases resolve with standard treatment. By contrast, myocarditis risk from COVID infection itself is higher.
4️⃣ About Forbidden Truths: That book is not a peer-reviewed scientific source; it’s a polemic written by a security consultant, not an epidemiologist. It does not provide original data nor pass scientific reproducibility standards.
If you’re genuinely interested in reviewing the underlying data, I’d encourage starting with the CDC’s COVID-NET hospitalization surveillance and the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report archives — both publicly available and transparently sourced. Science welcomes skepticism, but claims should match the quality of evidence offered.
Bottom line: COVID’s risk has diminished, vaccines have saved millions of lives, and scientific rigor — not selective interpretation — remains our best tool for truth.
Maybe they can wipe the blood off of each others cuffed hands when all is said and done.
"At the September 9 hearing before the United States Senate ... Attorney Aaron Siri ... highlighted a ... “The Henry Ford study found that vaccinated children had a statistically significant increased rate of various serious chronic diseases"
. . .
This Sunday, Oct 12th at 8 pm EST, ICAN will premiere their documentary "An Inconvenient Study." Their film includes hidden camera footage of the lead author Dr. Zervos that contradicts Henry Ford Health's claims that his study was not published because of "flawed data and methodology." e.g. “I'd put it out just as it is ... [But] publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I'd be finished."
Here's the links to see the trailer, read the study, and read Siri's written testimony for yourself:
aninconvenientstudy.com
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/subcommittees/investigations/hearings/how-the-corruption-of-science-has-impacted-public-perception-and-policies-regarding-vaccines/
In the UK we never had mandatory childhood vaccination, it was understood people had bodily autonomy. The US use of mandates is a sign of regulatory capture and industry control over citizens freedoms.
With the covid scam this changed. these totalitarian mandates come from the US.
I was kicked out of the Evanston, Illinois YMCA for refusing to ANSWER whether I was vaccinated or not. Specifically, they asked everyone to show their vaccine card, and would establish a QR code to scan in to the Y.
In fact, I WAS vaccinated, as I got the first 2 shots out of fear and ignorance. I was just insulted by their demanding I prove it.
What is more amazing is that no one in Blue America thinks that is outrageous or has since reflected on it and made any amends.
I understand early on when everyone was terrified, but after one year it was evident that it was a scam, a hoax.
The most overlooked part is how it was manipulated to determine the election results, first to cheat Sanderss and second to cheat Trump.
Yes they are. We are dying out here.
https://substack.com/@thecoercednurse/note/p-175523868?r=1lvmb5&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Let the blue states go. Let them continue to jab. It has been 5 years now and they refuse to debate, reason or use critical thinking skills to even consider the dangers. They will depopulate themselves sad to say but that is their choice. With melancholy, perhaps it is better this occurs as rabid fanatics like this are not of benefit to society as a whole.
‘The science backs up the Trump - Kennedy approach.. ‘ HA! 🤣this article is complete propaganda BS. Remember when they fired all the scientists and replaced the with right wing bible humpers. There is no science behind this wack Job. I wish Americans could make it past high school, and religion was not the only thing to latch onto out in the country. Applebees, WallMart, football (which is just a modern form of a plantation). It’s a sad life y’all. I feel bad for most of you, sorry your life just didn’t amount to more than this. Sorry you are regulated to this nonsense. But good luck this winter. Most of the blue states will be vaccinated enough for herd immunity and have hospitals fully staffed. If there are enough Covid related rural deaths.. I wonder what history will call this winter.
Ha! You can have my jab, shill. You are laughable in your prideful ignorance. Remember when the mRNA shots didn't work, and those of us who didn't get them didn't get Covid while those who took them did? Was that you, Peter? lol Did you even read the piece, and the current CDC data? No one is dying of Covid, and your fearmongering is pathetic.
I get that emotions still run high on this topic, but let’s try to separate frustration from evidence.
1️⃣ Vaccination and infection rates: Many vaccinated people did get COVID — but that was never the promise. The purpose of the mRNA vaccines was to reduce severe illness, hospitalization, and death. The data show they did exactly that. CDC, Johns Hopkins, and Yale studies consistently found hospitalization rates were 5–10× lower among vaccinated adults during Delta and Omicron waves. That’s measurable protection, not a failure.
2️⃣ “No one is dying of COVID” — that’s simply untrue. The CDC’s provisional 2024 mortality report shows roughly 60,000 U.S. deaths where COVID was the underlying or contributing cause. That’s lower than the 350,000 peak years, yes, but it’s hardly “no one.” Saying “no one” ignores the immunocompromised, elderly, and those with underlying lung or cardiac disease who remain at risk.
3️⃣ “Unvaccinated didn’t get it” — that’s anecdote, not data. Random chance, behavior (masking, travel, crowd exposure), and prior infection history all play roles. Broad population data show unvaccinated people were more likely to test positive, be hospitalized, and die of COVID, across age groups.
4️⃣ Fearmongering vs. humility: Wanting accurate numbers isn’t fear — it’s responsibility. Science isn’t pride; it’s process. I did read the piece and the CDC data, and they don’t say what the article claims. The numbers show COVID’s risk has dropped, not vanished.
We can disagree politically, but facts don’t bend with opinion. Evidence still matters — even when it’s inconvenient.
He and all the rest of the sleeping sheeple can have my jabs too. Whatever happened to "my body my choice"?