There are at least 150 people who need to be tried at a Nuremberg style court for crimes against humanity. They were corrupt to the core and deserve no mercy, killing and injuring millions.
I have nothing but admiration for people whether it's scientists, doctors or others who are fighting against these tyrannical medical & pharmacological entities who want to do nothing but destroy scientific investigations.
The people behind the PubPeer smears and attacks must be part of the global cabal of hired sociopaths doing the same to researchers everywhere, especially in the British Commonwealth nations. A doctor in Australia, a former child refugee from Cambodia with an impeccable 27 year medical career, is being Orwelled for prescribing ivermectin to a few patients during the scamdemic. The regulatory authorities invented a complainant "John Smith" and cloned him into three complainants with layers of regulatory investigation codes and document numbers that have since disappeared from the files and website archives, and fake emails and phone numbers. There never were actual patient complaints yet she lost her license based on the regulator's invented complainant and paperwork. Courageously, she's fighting back. I sincerely hope Dr.El-Deiry gets justice. The Canadian doctors and researchers have not.
This is an example of an old, old problem in medicine. That it took world-wide illness and death for ordinary people to begin to notice and understand is tragic, though not surprising, but the good news is that this problem is now being noticed. We can all thank MAHA and its allies for keeping these stories out of the shadows, where they would otherwise never die.
Representative democracy in Western Countries has been corrupted from the top down by high profile individuals and corporations that pose as philanthropists, entrepreneurs and scientists acting in the public interest. Their close ties with our so- called political representatives often ensure that pet projects are promoted and taxpayer- funded with minimal public scrutiny. Industry regulators are funded by the very industries that they regulate and in the case of our Australian pesticide regulator, the APVMA also profits from product sales. Conflicts of interest are common as Western countries have lost the critical thinking, respectful public discourse, ethics and justice system necessary for good governance.
Fortunately we have ethical medical professionals, scientists, lawyers and concerned citizens who are helping to reverse this disturbing trend.
Corrupt corporations that pursue profits at the price of public health have nearly destroyed medical science in the United States. They control the journals, the state medical boards, textbook contents, medical education, you name it. I am no fan of government, but the fundamental purpose of government is to defend its population against military threat, and no nation can defend itself with sick, crippled, dead, and unborn soldiers and civilians. Therefore, public health is an essential element of national defense, and a fundamental responsibility of the government. The American government is an abject failure in this regard. It has failed to protect the public in any way. Instead, it protects only the profits of corporations.
Dystopian…why would anyone attack a brilliant man who is doing his best to explain what he is finding through his life’s work in science. It seems beyond human, demonic I would say.
It's absolutely possible these days to prevent attacks like he's describing. Substack appears to have such a feature embedded in its DMs. Reddit has one. These platforms don't need to adopt a grossly open model; they are scientific which presupposes qualifications and peer approval at a certain point. Certainly a combination of the "unaffiliated gentleman amateur" together with "abusive or derogatory language" could be trapped and prevented, because any individual tearing down work who is also entirely unaffiliated and anonymous should be using impeccable criteria in well formed and polite criticism, no?
There are at least 150 people who need to be tried at a Nuremberg style court for crimes against humanity. They were corrupt to the core and deserve no mercy, killing and injuring millions.
Exactly right!
I have nothing but admiration for people whether it's scientists, doctors or others who are fighting against these tyrannical medical & pharmacological entities who want to do nothing but destroy scientific investigations.
The people behind the PubPeer smears and attacks must be part of the global cabal of hired sociopaths doing the same to researchers everywhere, especially in the British Commonwealth nations. A doctor in Australia, a former child refugee from Cambodia with an impeccable 27 year medical career, is being Orwelled for prescribing ivermectin to a few patients during the scamdemic. The regulatory authorities invented a complainant "John Smith" and cloned him into three complainants with layers of regulatory investigation codes and document numbers that have since disappeared from the files and website archives, and fake emails and phone numbers. There never were actual patient complaints yet she lost her license based on the regulator's invented complainant and paperwork. Courageously, she's fighting back. I sincerely hope Dr.El-Deiry gets justice. The Canadian doctors and researchers have not.
This is an example of an old, old problem in medicine. That it took world-wide illness and death for ordinary people to begin to notice and understand is tragic, though not surprising, but the good news is that this problem is now being noticed. We can all thank MAHA and its allies for keeping these stories out of the shadows, where they would otherwise never die.
We need to pray for this Dr., for protection and courage to continue to do the research that will save many lives.
Representative democracy in Western Countries has been corrupted from the top down by high profile individuals and corporations that pose as philanthropists, entrepreneurs and scientists acting in the public interest. Their close ties with our so- called political representatives often ensure that pet projects are promoted and taxpayer- funded with minimal public scrutiny. Industry regulators are funded by the very industries that they regulate and in the case of our Australian pesticide regulator, the APVMA also profits from product sales. Conflicts of interest are common as Western countries have lost the critical thinking, respectful public discourse, ethics and justice system necessary for good governance.
Fortunately we have ethical medical professionals, scientists, lawyers and concerned citizens who are helping to reverse this disturbing trend.
Corrupt corporations that pursue profits at the price of public health have nearly destroyed medical science in the United States. They control the journals, the state medical boards, textbook contents, medical education, you name it. I am no fan of government, but the fundamental purpose of government is to defend its population against military threat, and no nation can defend itself with sick, crippled, dead, and unborn soldiers and civilians. Therefore, public health is an essential element of national defense, and a fundamental responsibility of the government. The American government is an abject failure in this regard. It has failed to protect the public in any way. Instead, it protects only the profits of corporations.
Dystopian…why would anyone attack a brilliant man who is doing his best to explain what he is finding through his life’s work in science. It seems beyond human, demonic I would say.
May the force be with you doctor . Don’t back down . And thank you for.
It's absolutely possible these days to prevent attacks like he's describing. Substack appears to have such a feature embedded in its DMs. Reddit has one. These platforms don't need to adopt a grossly open model; they are scientific which presupposes qualifications and peer approval at a certain point. Certainly a combination of the "unaffiliated gentleman amateur" together with "abusive or derogatory language" could be trapped and prevented, because any individual tearing down work who is also entirely unaffiliated and anonymous should be using impeccable criteria in well formed and polite criticism, no?
Spot on!
https://indepnews.org/en/what-the-laval-case-shows-about-academic-freedom/
https://indepnews.org/en/academic-dissent-at-universite-laval-during-covid/
https://hxlibraries.substack.com/p/when-collegiality-becomes-censorship