Discussion about this post

User's avatar
E. Grogan's avatar

Mr. Conte: As an autistic person myself, I deeply appreciate this very excellent article you have written. I'm in my 70s now but back in 1960 when I was not yet 6 y.o. I was vaccinated. Back then it was VERY well-known that you NEVER vax any child under the age of 6, and hopefully not until the child is older than 6. This is because the child's brain was not developed well enough to protect against any harm vaxes may well do to the brain. At the time, my mother wanted to put me up for adoption. She truly never wanted me and wasn't a very nice person or a good mother. She left me alone for days on end when I was a baby in a crib. I would go for days with no food, no diaper changes, etc. This was told to me by my birth father who I later found when I was in my 30s. In order for me to be put up for adoption, I had to be vaccinated. My mother took me to the doctor's to be vaxed but he refused because I was too young to be jabbed. He knew it probably would cause harm. While there, my mother went on a very angry rampage and kept insisting I needed to be jabbed. I remember the doctor was very upset and concerned about this and got very quiet for a few moments. Finally, he turned to me and said "Young lady, I truly hope you will be able to remember this in the future. But I really think it's best that I give you the vaccine so you can hopefully be adopted by a loving family, because I think it's best that you get away from your mother." I'm very grateful to that doctor for making that very difficult decision. A couple months later I was adopted and shortly after I was adopted my mother thought I was autistic because I would rock back and forth a lot, which is one sign of autism. There were other things I did that was autistic as well and now late in life I realize those symptoms as autism. Vaccines cause autism, as well as other brain issues, too. I don't believe autism is genetic, I am suspicious of those "studies"; I am a researcher and do know that many "studies" are falsified.

When I was young, autism was not very well-known because kids weren't vaxed before age 6 and I never knew anyone with autism. Today, 1 in 33 kids are autistic. That number used to be 1 in 100,000 back in 1970. Just sharing my 2 cents worth of info.

Root Causes's avatar

Roughly 200 - 300 genes have strong, well-supported links to autism. If you include moderate and emerging evidence, the number rises to about 500 - 1,000 genes.

If you count all statistically associated variants from large genome studies, it’s effectively thousands of genes influencing risk in small ways.

Different evidence standards: Some genes (those repeatedly hit by rare mutations) have clear, high-confidence roles. Others show up only in large statistical analyses and have much smaller, less certain effects.

Polygenic architecture: Autism risk often comes from the combined effect of many variants across the genome - not a single “autism gene.” This is similar to traits like height or blood pressure.

Ongoing discovery: Studies like this one from Columbia keep adding genes, but usually at the margins - refining the picture rather than redefining it.

Core set (high confidence): a few hundred genes

Extended set (likely involved): up to ~1,000

Full genetic landscape (including tiny effects): thousands

So when you hear “60 new genes,” it’s not a jump from, say, 200 to 260 in a neat list. it’s more like filling in additional pieces of a very large, already complex puzzle.

57 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?