9 Comments
User's avatar
Louis Conte's avatar

This article is essential reading for those who don't know the scope of the problems Kennedy is tackling. Well done!

Expand full comment
Mjgolfergirl's avatar

I appreciate the information in the article. This is what most of the American public is missing. They want to believe the system is designed to support their well being. And convincing them that it no longer is, is a tall task. Having the correct information with citations is helpful. Keep at it. The information is getting through.

Expand full comment
Jennifer's avatar

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple." Thank you for the details.

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

Imagine what the mainstream media could do in a week if they weren’t a bunch of corrupt baby killing sociopaths.

All this BS is more time wasted that could be used to create a healthier nation and world and expose the real demons .

RFK, I’ll keep you in my prayers! Keep going!

Expand full comment
Sandra Ganey's avatar

“How strange is it, that no matter the professional or scientific attainments of a man may be, no matter how he may have previously been honored, nor what positions of trust he occupied, the moment he says a word again vaccination, he is denounced as not knowing anything of the subject.” Professor Robert Gunn, MD, New York medical college, 1891

Expand full comment
Alison F's avatar

Excellent article. I'll add that, when you look at the list of "experts" passionately defending the use of vaccines, one Orwellian issue becomes immediately apparent: the news media never mentions vaccine injury victims, and never publishes quotes from doctors who actually diagnose and treat patients who have had serious adverse reactions to vaccines. Instead, they always publish quotes from "experts" in "vaccinology" (yes, it's apparently A Thing) and infectious disease -- people whose jobs, university chairs, and research funding come directly from the vaccine industry. They present vaccine risks in terms of incorrectly-calculated population risk (wording is usually something like "1 in a million!" "or vanishingly rare!") while risks of infection complication in terms of individual risk ("risks include hospitalization and death!")

Hello, newmedical newspeak and newscience.

Expand full comment
Thiravat Hemachudha's avatar

Very important piece of information and facts. Here in Thailand, it is much worse, as being manipulated by health officials, vaccine institute, major medical schools,

Those appeared in first class journal considered as bible, denying what happened before their eyes.

We have lost so many in the short as well longer time frame in many complex disease presentations. Sudden deaths, cancer, rapid dementia mimicking progressive supranuclear palsy or rapid AD /PD deterioration. We also had CJD with demonstrable CSF prion by RT Quic.

Lastly, many thanks for your article and whether it is pissible to translate this into Thai and disseminate to others and via social media with your name and MAHA title

Expand full comment
annapolis73's avatar

Let's ask the NY Times why they won't publish this as an 'Op-Ed." The answer is clear.

"They can't handle the truth."

Rarely will I add to the outstanding work of James Lyons-Weiler but I'd like to highlight one additional citation.

With our case next in line in he appeals process, the SCOTUS denied a writ of certiorari in the case of "Cloer v. H.H.S.." https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/1523476.html

The Court wishes to avoid the obvious. Our rights to due process have been abridged. Make sure you support the Bills in Congress that restore our Constitutional process.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4668/all-info

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4388/text

Expand full comment
Zara's avatar

Well stated!

Expand full comment