It would be interesting to know how many readers the NYT has lost, because it has no credibility. How many intelligent people who are readers, would subscribe to its faux journalism? Many are not going to the MSM for information anymore, because they are aware that the advertisers control the news that they receive.
Please allow me to point out that after the Money Power passed the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 assuring the future enslavement of all Americans to its greed and ambition (including massive profits from World War I), they made a list of all American newspapers they wished to buy into for purposes of propaganda and control. At the very TOP of the list was the New York Times. Nothing has changed over the last century-plus. The New York Times has continued its role as the chief mind-control organ of the financial elite, including BIG PHARMA of course. So keep up the good work, MAHA, in confronting this great evil.
Also please see our latest Three Sages contribution to understanding.
This is an absolutely sensational article. It exposes and clearly describes one of the many facets of modern ‘censorship, "Propaganda", The New York Times, once a pillar of journalism and honest reporting, has now become a propaganda machine kept alive only by life support.
The distinction between reality and emotion-driven unreality was lost on most people I know during the covid psyop, evidenced by the numbers who protest "No Kings" evidence-free. Too bad so many once sensible and sensitive Americans are giving their health and life to support such propaganda machinery.
I read this earlier on FB. How to get this in front of all the people living under delusions that the NYT (and all others) is a trustworthy news org. When I saw the piece of Facebook, I could not bring myself to Share it, because the picture at first appeared to me promote the NYT headline, rather than exposing it up front.
NYT political mouthpiece for the CIA, Big Medicine and the Deranged left.
Has nothing to report about reality, but rather keep pushing narratives that benefit their benefactors. Character assassination is their expertise and not honest reporting. Over and over they go down the wrong road into the swamp!
The NYT is not going to stop with their propaganda. One reason why the fired Bari Weiss, who said on Bill Mahrer, that the COVID pandemic "will go down as the crime of the century." However, the NYT are not the only ones, Washington Post, The Week, etc.; even sometimes- The Atlantic. I also know and love some very smart people who have drank the propaganda poison. Doctors who (some) are friends, incessantly lectured me about the COVID/Flu shots. I think the truth is hard for some people to grasp. I must say that at times I struggle with all media in their "truth telling/fact finding" reports. The media machines have done a great job of confusing and misleading the public.
This piece isn’t journalism, it’s damage control. Multiple independent analyses have already shown the MAHA report leans on fake citations and badly misrepresents the science on kids’ health, and trying to spin basic fact-checking as a “smear” is pure gaslighting.
Propping up a health agenda built on made-up studies and conspiracy vibes doesn’t “make America healthy” — it normalizes lying about data in the middle of a real public-health crisis. Anyone who looks at that, shrugs, and cheers it on is being awful for the human race.
Except that we in the medical field have seen the facts. I used to give babies 4 to 5 vaccines at one time ,- realized soon their little immune systems were over whelmed.
I followed the CDC numbers & was appalled at the side effects any other vaccines would have been pulled from self. The tests were so bad even at ground zero in Bay area wed send in the 10 quality control sterile swabs dipped in sterile saline one a week which should have come back negative - even those came back some positive for Covid. Flawed teats, flawed vaccines & forced to use Covid meds only Fauci authorized one of such wasn't FDA approved - cause 30 to 40% kidney failure. My neighbor Missy McKown who worked at Mortuary agreed with other that often death from Cancer was labeled death from Covid so the hospital had better payback.
If it was true what California my birth place spouted on airways " Stay Home Stay safe" why were all the first victims Nursing Homes patients? KA times did great piece on why it spread to nursing homes so quickly. My best friend explained as a Filipino the nursing homes run by them would fly through China often. Pick up the virus & by the time they shut the flights down all her nurses had worked spreading Covid to multiple nursing homes then flying to others. A patient who had Covid also said her bosses made her work suck at Nursing home even with mask no one cared about these old folks & how quickly the virus spread across from Calif to New York.
Pretty soon with the constant change in the virus our doctors said new immunizations would never work. It was a nasty virus but so was the booster that caused many patients to have heart problems, paralyzed arms. No other vaccine left my patients with severely enlarged lymph nodes we did a lots of unnecessary biopsies thinking the patients had lymphoma.
CDC records show over 60% of fatalities were Diabetics makes with underlying circulatory problems kidney liver. No surprise our thing African patients ( we have hospital there) or patients from India did Not have the death tolls US Italy China did. Chinas mistake was cooping their population indoors. Africa India other poor sunshine countries did well not shutting people inside.
You’re throwing around “we in the medical field” like it’s a magic shield, but nothing you’ve written lines up with how evidence-based medicine actually works.
1. “4–5 vaccines at one time overwhelmed babies’ immune systems”
That’s just not how immunology works. Kids are exposed to thousands of antigens every day from food, air, and surfaces. The combined antigen load in routine vaccines is tiny compared to normal life. If you actually followed the literature, you’d know multiple large studies have found no link between the standard vax schedule and immune “overload,” autism, or developmental harm.
2. “Any other vaccines would have been pulled” / “side effects were appalling”
You’re ignoring the scale: billions of doses worldwide. When you vaccinate that many people, you will see rare adverse events – and that’s exactly why systems like VAERS, VSD, and international pharmacovigilance exist. What you’re describing as “appalling” is exactly what safety monitoring is supposed to pick up: tiny risks in the context of a virus that killed millions and hospitalized tens of millions.
3. The PCR / swab thing
If your “sterile” controls were coming back positive repeatedly, that’s a lab contamination or protocol problem, not proof that PCR is bogus or COVID tests were fake. Real labs use controls to catch and fix those issues – that’s literally the point of controls.
4. Kidney failure / “not FDA-approved” treatment
Early COVID treatment was messy as hell, but you’re mashing together anecdotes and half-remembered protocol wars and turning them into a conspiracy. The big controlled trials that followed are exactly how medicine corrected early mistakes. That’s science working, not some big cover-up.
5. “Hospitals relabeled cancer deaths as COVID for money”
This is straight-up conspiracy garbage. Did coding and incentives sometimes distort how things were documented? Sure, that happens every day in US healthcare. But the idea that doctors and nurses en masse lied on death certificates to chase a bonus is an accusation of industrial-scale fraud without evidence. You’re smearing entire professions based on “my neighbor at a mortuary said…”
6. Nursing homes & spread
The reason nursing homes got hit first isn’t mysterious:
• Crowded indoor settings
• Very old, very sick people
• Staff moving between facilities
That was documented everywhere from Italy to New York. Flying in from China wasn’t the only path – community spread + systemic neglect was more than enough.
7. “New immunizations would never work” / boosters “caused heart problems and paralysis”
Vaccines did work: they cut severe disease and death dramatically, especially in older and high-risk patients. Did mRNA vaccines have side effects? Absolutely – especially rare myocarditis in young males and temporary lymph node swelling. But you’re comparing that to COVID as if COVID itself didn’t also cause myocarditis, clotting, strokes, long-term disability, and death. The risk from the virus was – and is – far higher than the risk from the shot for the groups most at risk.
8. Africa/India vs US/Italy/China
You’re leaving out massive differences:
• Age structure (much younger populations)
• Under-reporting of deaths and cases
• Different timing and variants
Using “Africa and India didn’t do as badly” as proof that lockdowns or vaccines were the problem is just cherry-picking on a continental scale.
Bottom line:
What you’ve written isn’t “we in the medical field have seen the facts.” It’s a grab-bag of anecdotes, lab sloppiness, and conspiracy talking points dressed up as expertise. If you really had solid training and worked in evidence-based medicine, you’d be citing properly designed studies, not your neighbor at the mortuary and a half-remembered story about swabs.
After clicking this article, I was curious to read how the New York Times actually dropped the ball in their smear article of RFK jr. What I read seemed to be more of a speculative opinion piece.
A journalistic dissection of the article and a statement of facts and evidence would have been a compelling read and supportive of the article title.
After “Let’s dive in”, this reader never got to the bottom of anything.
The Times article says "She described riding with him around Los Angeles in his stinky mess of a van, as he drove recklessly on the road and yelled at his dogs." I remember reading that story, and while I remember that the van was a mess, I came away with the impression that he was affectionate with his dogs. The times make it sound like he was abusing them.
The article also says "And when his campaign finally combusted in August 2024..." This also implies that his campaign failed due to deficiencies on the candidates part. Well, I was planning to vote for RFK so I was following the campaign. He and other candidates were torpedoed by the Democratic Party, which subverted the whole primary process, making it impossible for anyone but Biden to get the nomination.
So, true to form, the Times is biased. Not worth paying to read.
Olivia Nuzzi is Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction minus the actual one night stand.
It would be interesting to know how many readers the NYT has lost, because it has no credibility. How many intelligent people who are readers, would subscribe to its faux journalism? Many are not going to the MSM for information anymore, because they are aware that the advertisers control the news that they receive.
Please allow me to point out that after the Money Power passed the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 assuring the future enslavement of all Americans to its greed and ambition (including massive profits from World War I), they made a list of all American newspapers they wished to buy into for purposes of propaganda and control. At the very TOP of the list was the New York Times. Nothing has changed over the last century-plus. The New York Times has continued its role as the chief mind-control organ of the financial elite, including BIG PHARMA of course. So keep up the good work, MAHA, in confronting this great evil.
Also please see our latest Three Sages contribution to understanding.
https://montanarcc.substack.com/p/bo-yin-ra-commentary-on-metaphysical
I wish I could read the article but I refuse to contribute money to that rag. Can anyone copy/paste it here?
just click on the link. It's not pay walled yet.
https://archive.li/WA9pQ
This is an absolutely sensational article. It exposes and clearly describes one of the many facets of modern ‘censorship, "Propaganda", The New York Times, once a pillar of journalism and honest reporting, has now become a propaganda machine kept alive only by life support.
The distinction between reality and emotion-driven unreality was lost on most people I know during the covid psyop, evidenced by the numbers who protest "No Kings" evidence-free. Too bad so many once sensible and sensitive Americans are giving their health and life to support such propaganda machinery.
Agree see the Milgram Experiment,, but let's not give up. I feel momentum is moving to our cause
I agree about the momentum moving us forward. I still grieve the loss of rationality, civil discussion, and friendly banter at family gatherings.
It is only worthwhile to use as pee pee pads for one's puppy.
I read this earlier on FB. How to get this in front of all the people living under delusions that the NYT (and all others) is a trustworthy news org. When I saw the piece of Facebook, I could not bring myself to Share it, because the picture at first appeared to me promote the NYT headline, rather than exposing it up front.
Great post. Thanks. However, unless you post the actual article as a gift, I cannot open and read it. Thanks. MM
NYT political mouthpiece for the CIA, Big Medicine and the Deranged left.
Has nothing to report about reality, but rather keep pushing narratives that benefit their benefactors. Character assassination is their expertise and not honest reporting. Over and over they go down the wrong road into the swamp!
Excellent piece!!!!
The NYT is not going to stop with their propaganda. One reason why the fired Bari Weiss, who said on Bill Mahrer, that the COVID pandemic "will go down as the crime of the century." However, the NYT are not the only ones, Washington Post, The Week, etc.; even sometimes- The Atlantic. I also know and love some very smart people who have drank the propaganda poison. Doctors who (some) are friends, incessantly lectured me about the COVID/Flu shots. I think the truth is hard for some people to grasp. I must say that at times I struggle with all media in their "truth telling/fact finding" reports. The media machines have done a great job of confusing and misleading the public.
This piece isn’t journalism, it’s damage control. Multiple independent analyses have already shown the MAHA report leans on fake citations and badly misrepresents the science on kids’ health, and trying to spin basic fact-checking as a “smear” is pure gaslighting.
Propping up a health agenda built on made-up studies and conspiracy vibes doesn’t “make America healthy” — it normalizes lying about data in the middle of a real public-health crisis. Anyone who looks at that, shrugs, and cheers it on is being awful for the human race.
Bull. Did you look up who funds your "multiple independent analyses"?
Not independent at all, but paid propaganda.
Except that we in the medical field have seen the facts. I used to give babies 4 to 5 vaccines at one time ,- realized soon their little immune systems were over whelmed.
I followed the CDC numbers & was appalled at the side effects any other vaccines would have been pulled from self. The tests were so bad even at ground zero in Bay area wed send in the 10 quality control sterile swabs dipped in sterile saline one a week which should have come back negative - even those came back some positive for Covid. Flawed teats, flawed vaccines & forced to use Covid meds only Fauci authorized one of such wasn't FDA approved - cause 30 to 40% kidney failure. My neighbor Missy McKown who worked at Mortuary agreed with other that often death from Cancer was labeled death from Covid so the hospital had better payback.
If it was true what California my birth place spouted on airways " Stay Home Stay safe" why were all the first victims Nursing Homes patients? KA times did great piece on why it spread to nursing homes so quickly. My best friend explained as a Filipino the nursing homes run by them would fly through China often. Pick up the virus & by the time they shut the flights down all her nurses had worked spreading Covid to multiple nursing homes then flying to others. A patient who had Covid also said her bosses made her work suck at Nursing home even with mask no one cared about these old folks & how quickly the virus spread across from Calif to New York.
Pretty soon with the constant change in the virus our doctors said new immunizations would never work. It was a nasty virus but so was the booster that caused many patients to have heart problems, paralyzed arms. No other vaccine left my patients with severely enlarged lymph nodes we did a lots of unnecessary biopsies thinking the patients had lymphoma.
CDC records show over 60% of fatalities were Diabetics makes with underlying circulatory problems kidney liver. No surprise our thing African patients ( we have hospital there) or patients from India did Not have the death tolls US Italy China did. Chinas mistake was cooping their population indoors. Africa India other poor sunshine countries did well not shutting people inside.
You’re throwing around “we in the medical field” like it’s a magic shield, but nothing you’ve written lines up with how evidence-based medicine actually works.
1. “4–5 vaccines at one time overwhelmed babies’ immune systems”
That’s just not how immunology works. Kids are exposed to thousands of antigens every day from food, air, and surfaces. The combined antigen load in routine vaccines is tiny compared to normal life. If you actually followed the literature, you’d know multiple large studies have found no link between the standard vax schedule and immune “overload,” autism, or developmental harm.
2. “Any other vaccines would have been pulled” / “side effects were appalling”
You’re ignoring the scale: billions of doses worldwide. When you vaccinate that many people, you will see rare adverse events – and that’s exactly why systems like VAERS, VSD, and international pharmacovigilance exist. What you’re describing as “appalling” is exactly what safety monitoring is supposed to pick up: tiny risks in the context of a virus that killed millions and hospitalized tens of millions.
3. The PCR / swab thing
If your “sterile” controls were coming back positive repeatedly, that’s a lab contamination or protocol problem, not proof that PCR is bogus or COVID tests were fake. Real labs use controls to catch and fix those issues – that’s literally the point of controls.
4. Kidney failure / “not FDA-approved” treatment
Early COVID treatment was messy as hell, but you’re mashing together anecdotes and half-remembered protocol wars and turning them into a conspiracy. The big controlled trials that followed are exactly how medicine corrected early mistakes. That’s science working, not some big cover-up.
5. “Hospitals relabeled cancer deaths as COVID for money”
This is straight-up conspiracy garbage. Did coding and incentives sometimes distort how things were documented? Sure, that happens every day in US healthcare. But the idea that doctors and nurses en masse lied on death certificates to chase a bonus is an accusation of industrial-scale fraud without evidence. You’re smearing entire professions based on “my neighbor at a mortuary said…”
6. Nursing homes & spread
The reason nursing homes got hit first isn’t mysterious:
• Crowded indoor settings
• Very old, very sick people
• Staff moving between facilities
That was documented everywhere from Italy to New York. Flying in from China wasn’t the only path – community spread + systemic neglect was more than enough.
7. “New immunizations would never work” / boosters “caused heart problems and paralysis”
Vaccines did work: they cut severe disease and death dramatically, especially in older and high-risk patients. Did mRNA vaccines have side effects? Absolutely – especially rare myocarditis in young males and temporary lymph node swelling. But you’re comparing that to COVID as if COVID itself didn’t also cause myocarditis, clotting, strokes, long-term disability, and death. The risk from the virus was – and is – far higher than the risk from the shot for the groups most at risk.
8. Africa/India vs US/Italy/China
You’re leaving out massive differences:
• Age structure (much younger populations)
• Under-reporting of deaths and cases
• Different timing and variants
Using “Africa and India didn’t do as badly” as proof that lockdowns or vaccines were the problem is just cherry-picking on a continental scale.
Bottom line:
What you’ve written isn’t “we in the medical field have seen the facts.” It’s a grab-bag of anecdotes, lab sloppiness, and conspiracy talking points dressed up as expertise. If you really had solid training and worked in evidence-based medicine, you’d be citing properly designed studies, not your neighbor at the mortuary and a half-remembered story about swabs.
BRAVO!
Please say it’s so!!! I’d love to see this RAG fall!
After clicking this article, I was curious to read how the New York Times actually dropped the ball in their smear article of RFK jr. What I read seemed to be more of a speculative opinion piece.
A journalistic dissection of the article and a statement of facts and evidence would have been a compelling read and supportive of the article title.
After “Let’s dive in”, this reader never got to the bottom of anything.
You sound like a Big Pharma Shrill, bought and paid for.
The Times article says "She described riding with him around Los Angeles in his stinky mess of a van, as he drove recklessly on the road and yelled at his dogs." I remember reading that story, and while I remember that the van was a mess, I came away with the impression that he was affectionate with his dogs. The times make it sound like he was abusing them.
The article also says "And when his campaign finally combusted in August 2024..." This also implies that his campaign failed due to deficiencies on the candidates part. Well, I was planning to vote for RFK so I was following the campaign. He and other candidates were torpedoed by the Democratic Party, which subverted the whole primary process, making it impossible for anyone but Biden to get the nomination.
So, true to form, the Times is biased. Not worth paying to read.