Mary Holland’s advocacy journey has evolved from human rights for dissidents in the former Soviet Union to health freedom for children in the United States.
Both, she believes, reflect a calling that began to take shape when she majored in Russian and Soviet Studies as an undergraduate at Radcliffe College, Harvard University. During a semester in Moscow in 1980, she learned first-hand about human rights violations impacting dissidents who were censored, harassed, marginalized, and surveilled.
“That time prepared me for what I’ve seen in the fight for medical freedom,” Holland said during a recent interview with The MAHA Report. “Who has the power to make decisions, and what recourse do people have when they believe those decisions have harmed them?”
Holland, the co-author of two books on vaccines, Vaccine Epidemic and The HPV Vaccine on Trial, is president of Children’s Defense Fund (CHD), a non-profit founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in 2018 to better understand and address the rise in autism.
Holland said CHD became essential during Covid, challenging government mandates and pushing for all medical decisions to remain with individuals and families.
“If we do not have full autonomy to make our medical decisions, especially for our children, we are not free,” she said.
Holland explained that CHD’s work centers on four connected pillars: education, advocacy, litigation, and science. The organization focuses on environmental and other exposures affecting children’s health, along with issues including vaccines, electromagnetic radiation, pesticides, and fluoride.
CHD produces peer-reviewed science and pursues litigation to hold government and corporations accountable. During Covid the organization sued the CDC, FDA, HHS, NIH, Department of Defense, Merck, the state of New York, and the District of Columbia.
“This movement needs both grassroots and legal dimensions,” Holland said. “The corrupting influence of money has made it almost impossible to win over state and federal executives, legislators, regulators, media, and organized medical groups.”
She added, “The place where we have a fighting chance still is in the courts of public opinion and the rule of law. Precedents like Jacobson v. Massachusetts and the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act don’t make this easy, but it’s possible.”
After completing her undergraduate degree at Harvard, Holland earned master’s and Juris Doctor degrees at Columbia University. She later served as a professor at the New York University School of Law, where she was director of the Graduate Lawyering program for 15 years. She was also a lecturer on international human rights advocacy at Columbia Law School.
Holland’s parents were physicians – mainstream MDs who worked in hospitals and academic medicine and were members of major medical societies. Three of her siblings work in medicine or the pharmaceutical industry.
“I didn’t have a skeptical background towards mainstream medicine. It was quite the opposite. I contemplated going into medicine and saw it as a noble profession,” Holland said.
Her perspective changed when she had her first child at 38.
Like many advocates in the health freedom movement, she learned about vaccine injury from her son’s experience.
“I was aware that vaccine injury was possible – 1 in a million, or so I thought.”
As a first-time mother, she acknowledged that she didn’t know the signs of probable aluminum and mercury toxicity before her son received the MMR shot.
He was born in the late 1990s in the former Soviet Union when she and her husband ventured there.
“I delayed in getting him vaccines,” she recalled. “I wanted to be sure I got the shots in the United States, not Russia, so he didn’t get his MMR until he was over 2.”
The young boy’s health declined. He lost all language, couldn’t sleep, and frequently drooled. His hair became very coarse, and he showed clear signs of developmental issues, Holland explained.
“Like so many parents, we started this odyssey of going to see neurologists, psychologists and other medical professionals that included an occupational therapist, a physical therapist, and a speech therapist,” Holland said.
The occupational therapist gave her a book called Unraveling the Mystery of Autism by Karen Seroussi, and Holland learned about an association of scientists, doctors, and parents called Defeat Autism Now.
“When my child suffered a precipitous developmental regression, ending in an autism diagnosis, my appreciation of vaccine injury risk changed fundamentally,” she said. “I pieced together that there was no other plausible explanation for my child’s developmental regression.”
Added Holland,“Once I learned about the extreme liability protection that industry and healthcare providers enjoy, and the suppression of accurate science and information about vaccine risks and injury, I understood the need for immediate, radical systemic change. I have been devoted to that change ever since.”
Holland was invited to join the CHD board when the organization launched in 2018. The following year she became general counsel.
Led by Kennedy, CHD was outspoken about a plethora of issues, including the injuries that afflict children because of the childhood vaccine schedule.
The organization’s online presence grew rapidly until President Joe Biden was elected and censorship became widespread. Kennedy and CHD were removed from multiple social media platforms.“We brought cases against censorship,” recalls Holland. “We brought cases related to the PREP Act. We brought cases on religious exemptions, on medical exemptions, and on antitrust for the media censoring us for financial reasons, not just for ideological reasons,”
When then CHD president Lyn Redwood retired in 2021, she and the board asked Holland to fill the top leadership role.
Holland spent a few months in 2023 as a strategist, fundraiser, and organizer for Kennedy’s presidential campaign before returning as president of CHD that fall. She has remained president since.
“My work for health freedom has been my driving force for more than 25 years, addressing the crisis of children’s health, holding those responsible for chronic health epidemics accountable, and preserving fundamental human rights. CHD’s work in this area is unparalleled and urgent,” Holland said.
In addition to the books she has co-authored, Holland has also co-edited or contributed to works such as the English edition of Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth, and published articles on vaccine law and policy, including a review of compensated cases of vaccine-induced brain injury, “Unanswered Questions from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,” published in the Pace Environmental Law Review.
Holland calls the childhood vaccine schedule a “cash cow” for the pharmaceutical industry, saying that loading infants with vaccines is “insane” and the bad health of so many Americans is proof of this.
More than 40 percent of America’s children have some kind of chronic health condition. The “explosion” in these conditions coincides with the “expansion of the vaccine schedule,” Holland noted.
Childhood vaccine injuries, she says, are “the saddest and most horrifying dimension of the pharmaceutical industry.”
“Big Pharma profits from vaccines and the chronic diseases that often result from them,” she said, emphasizing the importance of educating the public about injuries and their connection to vaccines.
The notion that the link between vaccines and autism has been debunked is “profoundly ridiculous,” Holland added. “Even with all the attention this topic has received over the last year, many people remain unaware of the story behind these claims. Making truthful information public will help people make informed decisions about whether to vaccinate their children or which vaccines to choose.”
“Over time,” she says, “I think most people will come to the view through truthful information that their children are better off not getting vaccines at least in the early years of their lives.”
CHD is also a resource and advocate for helping parents learn about vaccine exemptions for religious or philosophical reasons available in most states.
“We believe that people should have a choice whether they give their children vaccines or not, and the manner in which that is happening in 45 states today is through religious exemptions and medical exemptions,” Holland said.
“I am horrified that New York State is arbitrarily removing medical exemptions from medically fragile children,” she said. “It is literally putting their lives on the line. We have emergency litigation right now on behalf of a 17-year-old girl who received a medical exemption last year, and the same judge and the same doctors refused the medical exemption this year.”
Holland is encouraged about the progress made on children’s health in Washington D.C. through Kennedy, President Donald Trump, and Congress.
At CHD’s inaugural Advocacy Day on Capitol Hill, the organization praised Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) for courageously amplifying the truth about what happened during Covid, despite tremendous pressure not to do so.
Significant change isn’t accomplished overnight, or even over the course of one presidential term, Holland acknowledges. She remains motivated by the children’s health crisis and the need for parents to have the freedom to make decisions they deem best for their children.
“Medical freedom is foundational to a free society,” Holland said. “This cause is the hill I’m going to die on.”










We are so lucky to have Mary fighting for us!
I truly admire Mary, so I wanted to share with your readers what I published today elsewhere at Substack. It comports with the "Court of public opinion" necessity:
https://michellerabinphd.substack.com/p/the-abandoned-mandate/
Since I did not have the imprimatur of RFK, Jr, I chose to be the "slingshot." That was 1998. Ironically, I had a friend hand deliver a letter to RFK, Jr. at his Westchester County home, since he was acutely aware of the dnagers of Mercury as part of his "Riverkeeper" watchdog group. You see, I'm old. I knew RFK ( the senior) in 1968 by virtue of my goal of obtaining nomination to USNA in 1969. I recieved his reply in the mail on June 5, 1968. To say it was a sad day is horribly understated.
I never gave up on dream #1 and was subsequently the principal nominee of my NYC Congressman.
I now refuse to give up on obtaining due process of law to achive justice on behalf of our vaccine injured son. That quest began in 2002 when I was an insuffcient weapon as a "slingshot."
We sued Phrma for poiosning our child with Hg via the use of the Thimerosal preservative used in every multi dose vial of every such inoculation that he received in that manner.
Our case was the first ever to be "stayed" in U.S. District Court, while we pursued he claims in USCFC as directed by the VICP and the 1986 NCVIA legislation. But, we had the opportunity to return to Judge Weinstein's District Court later. That never happened before.
Phrma ended that by their legalized bribery of Congress. They had a close friend in Bill Frist who was then Senate Majority Leader. His family controlled HCA and was a major stockholder in Eli Lilly. Guess who made Thimerosal? It starts with Eli and ends with Lilly.
Our country was attacked on 9/11/2001 and the Homeland Security Act of 2002 ws making it's way through the Capitol Hill. So, Frist got the 'Eli Lilly Rider" attached to the Bill the night before the House was to vote on it. Bingo! Thimerosal is now "part of the vaccine" not the preservative separate as we alleged in Court. At the end of October 2002, our suit is "dismissed."
You have done a truncated job of descrigin the injustices in th system. God knows how many books have been written to describe the mess that unfolded as our case and others ( Cloer v HHS, most notably) were met with the rigged resistance of the Special Masters of USCFC.
USCFC is the only Court which has an arbitrary 36 month statute of limitations placed on claims whihc sgtarts from "date of first symptoms" for the injured petitioning party. NO other Courtm neither State nor Federal disallows "equitable tolling" for a minor or someone rendered incompetent. it's simple. You don't lose your right to sue when you can't act!
Our entire nation rests on a single principle. Equal justice under the law. It is not true in practice.
We have legisaltion governing our lives which only the SCOTUS can remove. We ( see Cloer v HHS for a prior decision) can't do this unless the Justices grant "certiorari" to hear the case. They did not. They apparently want the Congress to go back and change the 1986 NCVIA laws and/or the ruled governing USCFC under the VICP.
Mr Kennedy need more than a slingshot. He need millions of them. That's us. He needs the support to be the President. I am not sure that 'David" had the negotiating skills to defeat Goliath by influence of his fellow cabinet members or thos in Congress. It took brute force.
Our son is 34 today. He reqires 24/7/365 care and supervision. I am a caregiver, as is my wife and his older brother. We need you. I have nothing much left to give and losing my ability to fight. Goliath on the other hand has grown bigger and stronger over the 30 year battle.
The American people have the soltuion in their hands. They seem not to know, yet alone truly "care." as decent as they are, in their mind there are bigger fish to fry. It didn't happen to them. They convenienty label us "anti-vaccine." Wanting safe food doesn't make you "anti-food" does it? Demanding the same protections that the 4th and 15th Amedments provide for equal protection and the right to use the justice system to obtain it doesn't make you "anti-Government" does it?
There is no liberty without justice.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/3853