22 Comments
User's avatar
Louis Conte's avatar

Time and time again, Kennedy has been correct while legacy media and entities like the "Trusted News Initiative" have been wrong. Thank you for reminding us!

Expand full comment
Panama Dusa's avatar

It was a very good day today. Love to see them smiles 🇺🇸

Expand full comment
JS's avatar

What a relief to know Fauci can't endanger the planet any longer even as he lined his pockets and bolstered his ego.

Expand full comment
YvonneM's avatar

Thank you Adam, RFK Jr. is one of the few who deserves kudos. After reading TRAF and getting through Wuhan, I’d say RFK got a heck of a lot right. Yet, people find things to pick on. Hilarious.

Expand full comment
Will Hall's avatar

The virus was engineered in a North Carolina lab. Check Jeffrey Sacks on this. I fear that blaming China betrays a pro-war agenda.

Expand full comment
Fred Kittelmann's avatar

Or if not a pro-war agenda, an attempt to deflect blame away from American institutions. Robert Redfield also says North Carolina. But location doesn't matter nearly as much as sponsorship.

Expand full comment
Quachin's avatar

So you read. So you reiterate. Except that there is no "virus"

Expand full comment
Sue's avatar

Jeffrey previously swore it was from Wuhan ???

Expand full comment
Kelli's avatar

YOU are the best,

Expand full comment
Rudy Anderson's avatar

My admiration for RFK, Jr. has grown over the years. I heard him speak many years ago and was cheering his run for the Presidency, but looking at the headwind he faces now as head of HHS, and the moves he makes without flinching only increases my astonishment at his courage, his intelligence, and his love for our country's citizens. May his leadership last beyond the 4 years of this current administration!

Expand full comment
John Wright's avatar

Off the top of my head, I don't recall anything he got *wrong* in the book.

Expand full comment
Stephen G Liss's avatar

USAID funded a lot of good work through Catholic Relief Services.

https://www.crs.org/

Pity that's halted. Any chance of renewed funding for CRS projects?

Expand full comment
Dr Dennis Kinnane OMD LAc RPh's avatar

Is this the SAME CRS which has been funding armies of illegal aliens to cross our borders and raking off ginormous profits in so doing?

Expand full comment
Stephen G Liss's avatar

Got any proof? I'd like to know.

Expand full comment
YvonneM's avatar

I just saw them (Catholic Charities) listed as involved in trafficking. I believe in FL.

Expand full comment
Stephen G Liss's avatar

Catholic Charities is a different organization, not the same as Catholic Relief Services.

Got a link? What is FL?

Expand full comment
Quachin's avatar

sort of...

"When it became clear that the virus causing COVID-19 was a product of such experiments, the scientific establishment rushed to defend and obscure gain-of-function research."

The built in false belief is the assumption that virus exist as agents of infectious disease when they do not. One hedge funder offered an uncollected mil to anyone who could prove they do.

Based on that fallacy the discussion ensues. The Medical Cartel and their bosses Big P depend on a clueless public to believe this Non Science.

So RFK did not get that right. If we substitue bioweapon for virus we are over the target.

Otherwise why would any thinking person believe the stage is not set, the guns trigger not cocked, for the next and next and next "virus" of the year grift??

Listenting for any intelligent response but anticipating none...

Expand full comment
Fred Kittelmann's avatar

Germ theory of disease is vastly overrated, but I don't think it's Completely false. Can viruses be distinguished from exosomes? Perhaps their function of communication within the body occurs between bodies as well. Sometimes their message is destructive, as in aging. In that sense they could be harmful and possibly made more harmful. But I don't see much room there, and so I don't worry much about bioweapon research.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

You mention exosomes.

In a deliberate attempt to rebrand virus, out of nowhere comes the term exosomes.

It should be patently obvious that rebranding virus is a total failed attempt to control the narrative. Here is why!

Medical Doctors are penning elaborate treatises documenting the virus fraud!!!

Bioweapons do exist, not trying to push an alarm button.

Expand full comment
Goeff's avatar

"If we substitue bioweapon for virus we are over the target."

"Bioweapon" is not very specific. Please specify the type of bioweapon and how it was created.

Expand full comment
Quachin's avatar

You could not afford that answer if you offered 50 mil, and I am not joking.

Bioweapon is the correct term, Virus like Sasquatch and Nessie make rare appearances with blurry images. Does not exist...

Expand full comment