11 Comments
User's avatar
The organic vet's avatar

So glad to hear this. Keep up all the great work in the halls and offices in DC. Also glad to see groups working together for a common cause. I had the pleasure of seeing Dr. Munoz in action as we visited offices and as she and I testified against the pesticide shield and raw milk ban, respectively, here in Raleigh.

Expand full comment
Mary's avatar

The rebuttal to harming children with vaccines, pesticides, toxins in our food, etc. was to say "It's everyone's fault so it's no one's fault." I'm here to say: It's everyone's fault. Get the poison out.

Expand full comment
JD Smith's avatar

Keep up the great work! Letters and calls to our elected officials is what we can do to help!

Expand full comment
Nuala Norris's avatar

Great to hear this. Writing from Ireland, in admiration.

Expand full comment
Leigh's avatar

The halls of Congress are open to us. Thanks to MAAM for exercising their right to voice the opinion of the majority of the American people. We want protection and transparency from our government to the pesticides that may greatly harm us.

Expand full comment
CherylBray's avatar

Thank you soo much

Expand full comment
A Skeptic's avatar

Thanks for your great work!

We've shared your link on 'The Stacks'

https://askeptic.substack.com/p/the-stacks

Expand full comment
Ess S....'s avatar

Good News coverage, Klar!

CONGRATULATIONS👏👏👏 to the MAAMS & Sirs in this coalition~ Justice🗽& Truth 🗡️🛡️Warriors....Hail, hail for marching into the dim halls of Congress, to spread the truth & ⚔️stop the 👹Monster Monsanto & it's toxic hoard from spewng its poisonous brews☠️🛢️☣️ upon our nation....

Bring VICTORY Home 🎖️ for We the People... HEALTH FOR ALL🇺🇸🌎‼️

Excerpts from Klar's article~

"What federal representatives needed to hear was that Section 453 would shield not just glyphosate or even pesticide products from legal actions – it would protect all chemical products in the nation subject to FIFRA. This includes bug sprays, household cleaning supplies, and a myriad of other consumer products that have nothing to do with agriculture and farmers: an estimated 57,000 products would be prevented from label updates. This risks far more than holding companies immune from legal liability – it means Americans would not be properly warned of the dangers of products stocked on hardware and grocery store shelves across the country!"

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Go Zen! Our government reports that there are only 90,000 cases of lymphoma a year. How come I am aware of so many.? Did you know there are different reporting systems that are stitched together and requires statistical projections to come up with the numbers of how many cancer cases that we have in this country?

Time to revamp all our medical reporting systems into one uniform, national database, and learn the truth!

Expand full comment
EileenMc's avatar

Evil from same source is out of bounds human trait on steroid of Greed for profit$, land, power, resources, obedience, ego and sadistic violence. Same source. Different target. Different tactics. To them we are all just means to an end to be paved over instead of paradise, respect and peace among all. Stay in the struggle against this greed.

Expand full comment
SierraMoon's avatar

Would shielding chemical companies from liability potentially shift the legal ramifications to the farmers and/or the pesticide applicators they hire?

Expand full comment