A good enough start creating agencies to fix problems, but nothing new that we did not already know! Just want the vaccine investigation, injuries and so many (72) for children to be accounted for! No tiny human from birth should be riddled with so many chemicals! God gave us a beautiful and robust immune system that is being destroyed by chemicals funding big pharma and doctors! 😡
Yes, a good start, with lots of progress to date, which is itself incredible in a hostile environment, but seems soft on vaccines & biotech (in food/water/animals/aerosolized, and no mention of mRNA & universal vaccine platform as previously supported by RFK Jr) and EPA/USDA restricting harmful chemicals from getting into soil and food supply. No mention of specifically helping small/regenerative family farms/ranches, which is the backbone of our country, and they’re rapidly collapsing under excessive burden.
I understand this document is primarily HHS, but I hope collaborators EPA/USDA move away from industry capture and conflicts of interest as well, otherwise they’re undermining MAHA initiatives. For example, I was disappointed to see more studying of the dangers of fluoride in water, as if that hasn’t already been researched ad nauseam. We know it’s a neurotoxin for God’s sake, just remove it! Sounds like EPA fighting against removing it has set things back and is sickening.
I remain guardedly optimistic and I applaud RFK Jr. and new, independent leadership in public health, as well as all those in MAHA leadership behind the scenes. It’s an exciting time, we’ve finally arrived.
I feel all the agencies are fighting against each other just to stay alive, the medical industry is just that, an industry! Health is the last thing these agencies are looking for, the first is $$$$$$, so MAHA has a lot to be up against!
I am a hematologist. In my lifetime, we converted Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia from a virtually 100% death sentence to a virtually 100% cure rate. This is a pediatric disease and if one did not test these drugs on the children that get the disease (this is generally not an adult disease) then there would never have been a cure.
In addition, some medications well tested and very successful in adults behave differently in children and need their own testing to assure safety and efficacy in that population. Assuming that adult trials are adequate for either children or pregnant women is high risk behavior,
Unless one believes that all drugs are inherently bad and should not be tested on anyone ever, the testing of the drug on the appropriate class of potential recipients is essential.
If you can't look at what they are currently doing with drugs and not take issue with that you aren't looking at the trials. Now the pharma companies self regulate. The FDA approved a drug last month with no trials. All of the trials were terminated. Using drugs on consumers as the guinea pigs without proper trials is high risk behavior.
The new Moderna Spikevax approval had these as just some of the adverse events in 6 months to <12 years old. ileus, intussusception, strep infection, staph abscess, skull fracture, scrotal hematoma, radius, ulna, tibia fracture, humerus fracture, greenstick fracture, respiratory distress, respiratory failure and cardiac arrest.
The RSV drug for adults they used the adult and child dosing in pediatric testing. I can go on.
The current practice that is happening isn't science. I worked in the medical field for 25 years. There wasn't a single child of the many I took care of with RSV that died. There are many that have died from RSV shots. I gave many medications in my career. I know the value of medications. Let's not confuse science with child abuse.
I am curious with your knowledge. Is this an accurate statement the way they got the information from this trial to support this drug approval? I attached the approval letter as well.
The use of THROMBATE III in pediatric patients with hereditary antithrombin (AT) deficiency is supported by extrapolation of data from two clinical trials in adult patients.
Based on the recent research of repurposed drugs, I expect cancer treatments to take a different direction. For sure, some of my thinking is aspirational, but I've witnessed the brutality of current cancer therapies and it leaves me sick.
As far ALL, this is what AI had to say:
Long-term survival after acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment has improved significantly, particularly for children, with survival rates reaching 90% or more
. The outlook for adults is generally not as favorable, but it has also been improving, with long-term survival for certain adult groups now reaching 50% or more, depending on age and specific disease characteristics
The most critical factor influencing long-term survival after ALL treatment is the patient's age at diagnosis.
Children and adolescents: Cure rates for children are excellent, with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates exceeding 90% for those aged 1 to 18 years. Long-term event-free survival rates are around 85%. Even for relapsed cases, some targeted immunotherapies, such as CAR T-cell therapy, show high efficacy, especially for those with low disease burden.
Adults: The prognosis for adults is more varied and declines with age.
Young adults (15–39): Survival rates have improved with the use of pediatric-style intensive regimens. The 5-year OS rate is about 65%.
Older adults (40+): Prognosis worsens with age due to higher-risk disease features and comorbidities. Five-year OS rates are approximately 25% for those over 40 and can be as low as 10–15% for those over 60.
This is essentially correct. We can all wish that there were preventative and/or more natural solutions for all cancers (and all diseases for that matter). I have always been an advocate for those approaches. My point was that this is primarily a disease of children (likely 70% in those under 18) -- a particularly tragic time for an untimely death. Whether one likes the modality or not, most of these patients who died when I started practice now live. That is a foundational good -- not that one should not always seek the better. And if you are going to try to cure an almost always fatal disease in children, you have to test such cures on children.
Here’s some Fauci “science “ for you. Are you aligned with this methodology? From what I’ve read “ Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia” is not genetic. How about a humanistic approach to PREVENTING disease rather than torturing children and animals. After you watch this short little film, by all means comment.
Interesting choice of words. Believing in inherant harm is far far more accurate than the opposite. Not going to dissect ALL in children, however chemo is always toxic.
Adverse conditions require heroic intervention. There must be a better way
We are so proud of you, RFK, Jr., and your tireless staff, for doing something about health problems in this country - and particularly in spite of the groundless and cruel opposition. Millions of people support you.
The biggest concern is that this sounds ripe for "needing more funding" when the opposite direction is what will Make America Healthy Again. Fewer agencies, less government meddling. I sure hope there is a major "streamlining" effort occurring in parallel with all this!
Whoohoooo‼️ Given the relatively short time this HHS team was working at this 19-page Report, it is an EXCELLENT summation (& do disagree with another commenter here, that "nothing new that we did not already know"), as somehow a downplay of a never before outlined document that full tilt addresses the health threats to American, AND what is going to be the action thesis from which the HHS will dynamically face these threats through policy enacted & programs set in motion that WILL usher in a widespread & overwhelmingly supported health movement paradigm. Like any wholesale social change, it requires time to completely implement. Americans, give that time for healthy-- soils, food, food water, air-- and human health to be restored under HHS guidelines, projects backed by serious science and common sense practice!
The report is very good. However, based on the deplorable healthcare situation we are in, there needs to be more. It starts with recognizing that political science has replaced Real Science. As a physicist I know the difference!
Two other key healthcare matters that need to be prioritized:
This peer reviewed article describes disciplinary action for physicians who failed two core competencies for licensure and safe medical practice in the community.
Amazing! I’m so thankful for everyone who made this possible. I see so many children suffering, and it’s incredible to know these issues are finally being addressed. This brings so much hope.
A good enough start creating agencies to fix problems, but nothing new that we did not already know! Just want the vaccine investigation, injuries and so many (72) for children to be accounted for! No tiny human from birth should be riddled with so many chemicals! God gave us a beautiful and robust immune system that is being destroyed by chemicals funding big pharma and doctors! 😡
Yes, a good start, with lots of progress to date, which is itself incredible in a hostile environment, but seems soft on vaccines & biotech (in food/water/animals/aerosolized, and no mention of mRNA & universal vaccine platform as previously supported by RFK Jr) and EPA/USDA restricting harmful chemicals from getting into soil and food supply. No mention of specifically helping small/regenerative family farms/ranches, which is the backbone of our country, and they’re rapidly collapsing under excessive burden.
I understand this document is primarily HHS, but I hope collaborators EPA/USDA move away from industry capture and conflicts of interest as well, otherwise they’re undermining MAHA initiatives. For example, I was disappointed to see more studying of the dangers of fluoride in water, as if that hasn’t already been researched ad nauseam. We know it’s a neurotoxin for God’s sake, just remove it! Sounds like EPA fighting against removing it has set things back and is sickening.
I remain guardedly optimistic and I applaud RFK Jr. and new, independent leadership in public health, as well as all those in MAHA leadership behind the scenes. It’s an exciting time, we’ve finally arrived.
I feel all the agencies are fighting against each other just to stay alive, the medical industry is just that, an industry! Health is the last thing these agencies are looking for, the first is $$$$$$, so MAHA has a lot to be up against!
Excellent Stephanie!
Thx for the list!! And all you do. Brings tears of joy to my eyes. Finally, things may change for the better. 👍🏼🤞🏽🙏🏽
Sorry to see children weren't on the list to remove from drug trials. Makes no sense.
I am a hematologist. In my lifetime, we converted Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia from a virtually 100% death sentence to a virtually 100% cure rate. This is a pediatric disease and if one did not test these drugs on the children that get the disease (this is generally not an adult disease) then there would never have been a cure.
In addition, some medications well tested and very successful in adults behave differently in children and need their own testing to assure safety and efficacy in that population. Assuming that adult trials are adequate for either children or pregnant women is high risk behavior,
Unless one believes that all drugs are inherently bad and should not be tested on anyone ever, the testing of the drug on the appropriate class of potential recipients is essential.
If you can't look at what they are currently doing with drugs and not take issue with that you aren't looking at the trials. Now the pharma companies self regulate. The FDA approved a drug last month with no trials. All of the trials were terminated. Using drugs on consumers as the guinea pigs without proper trials is high risk behavior.
The new Moderna Spikevax approval had these as just some of the adverse events in 6 months to <12 years old. ileus, intussusception, strep infection, staph abscess, skull fracture, scrotal hematoma, radius, ulna, tibia fracture, humerus fracture, greenstick fracture, respiratory distress, respiratory failure and cardiac arrest.
The RSV drug for adults they used the adult and child dosing in pediatric testing. I can go on.
The current practice that is happening isn't science. I worked in the medical field for 25 years. There wasn't a single child of the many I took care of with RSV that died. There are many that have died from RSV shots. I gave many medications in my career. I know the value of medications. Let's not confuse science with child abuse.
I am curious with your knowledge. Is this an accurate statement the way they got the information from this trial to support this drug approval? I attached the approval letter as well.
The use of THROMBATE III in pediatric patients with hereditary antithrombin (AT) deficiency is supported by extrapolation of data from two clinical trials in adult patients.
https://www.fda.gov/media/188344/download?attachment
Based on the recent research of repurposed drugs, I expect cancer treatments to take a different direction. For sure, some of my thinking is aspirational, but I've witnessed the brutality of current cancer therapies and it leaves me sick.
As far ALL, this is what AI had to say:
Long-term survival after acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment has improved significantly, particularly for children, with survival rates reaching 90% or more
. The outlook for adults is generally not as favorable, but it has also been improving, with long-term survival for certain adult groups now reaching 50% or more, depending on age and specific disease characteristics
The most critical factor influencing long-term survival after ALL treatment is the patient's age at diagnosis.
Children and adolescents: Cure rates for children are excellent, with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates exceeding 90% for those aged 1 to 18 years. Long-term event-free survival rates are around 85%. Even for relapsed cases, some targeted immunotherapies, such as CAR T-cell therapy, show high efficacy, especially for those with low disease burden.
Adults: The prognosis for adults is more varied and declines with age.
Young adults (15–39): Survival rates have improved with the use of pediatric-style intensive regimens. The 5-year OS rate is about 65%.
Older adults (40+): Prognosis worsens with age due to higher-risk disease features and comorbidities. Five-year OS rates are approximately 25% for those over 40 and can be as low as 10–15% for those over 60.
This is essentially correct. We can all wish that there were preventative and/or more natural solutions for all cancers (and all diseases for that matter). I have always been an advocate for those approaches. My point was that this is primarily a disease of children (likely 70% in those under 18) -- a particularly tragic time for an untimely death. Whether one likes the modality or not, most of these patients who died when I started practice now live. That is a foundational good -- not that one should not always seek the better. And if you are going to try to cure an almost always fatal disease in children, you have to test such cures on children.
Here’s some Fauci “science “ for you. Are you aligned with this methodology? From what I’ve read “ Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia” is not genetic. How about a humanistic approach to PREVENTING disease rather than torturing children and animals. After you watch this short little film, by all means comment.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UOPo2svGxGaA
Interesting choice of words. Believing in inherant harm is far far more accurate than the opposite. Not going to dissect ALL in children, however chemo is always toxic.
Adverse conditions require heroic intervention. There must be a better way
as is true for endless other medical failures.
We are so proud of you, RFK, Jr., and your tireless staff, for doing something about health problems in this country - and particularly in spite of the groundless and cruel opposition. Millions of people support you.
I pray for RFK’s success. He is divinely driven and I’m so grateful for his leadership.
The biggest concern is that this sounds ripe for "needing more funding" when the opposite direction is what will Make America Healthy Again. Fewer agencies, less government meddling. I sure hope there is a major "streamlining" effort occurring in parallel with all this!
Thank you Bobby!!!
We don't need a 'childhood vaccine schedule' at all. First prove that ANY of them prevent any disease at all!!!
Moving in the right direction. Thanks for the info.
Whoohoooo‼️ Given the relatively short time this HHS team was working at this 19-page Report, it is an EXCELLENT summation (& do disagree with another commenter here, that "nothing new that we did not already know"), as somehow a downplay of a never before outlined document that full tilt addresses the health threats to American, AND what is going to be the action thesis from which the HHS will dynamically face these threats through policy enacted & programs set in motion that WILL usher in a widespread & overwhelmingly supported health movement paradigm. Like any wholesale social change, it requires time to completely implement. Americans, give that time for healthy-- soils, food, food water, air-- and human health to be restored under HHS guidelines, projects backed by serious science and common sense practice!
Wow! This is a dream come true!
The report is very good. However, based on the deplorable healthcare situation we are in, there needs to be more. It starts with recognizing that political science has replaced Real Science. As a physicist I know the difference!
Two other key healthcare matters that need to be prioritized:
1 - Require ABSOLUTE effectiveness to be prominently posted for all injections and treatments. <https://criticallythinking.substack.com/p/absolute-vs-relative-risk>
2 - Enact an INFORMED CONSENT document for consumers (users of recommended vaccines and treatments). This should be like <https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/master/borndig/9918663779606676/9918663779606676.pdf>.
For more, see my Substack commentaries about Critical Thinking, as that is what we need to do here: <https://criticallythinking.substack.com>.
Fantastic!
🙏🙏🙏
https://www.thegms.co/podcasts/care-standard-failure/
This peer reviewed article describes disciplinary action for physicians who failed two core competencies for licensure and safe medical practice in the community.
Amazing! I’m so thankful for everyone who made this possible. I see so many children suffering, and it’s incredible to know these issues are finally being addressed. This brings so much hope.
My God, give them a chance!!! They’ve already doing more than anyone else. There’s always a MOANER.