One doen't have to be a Christian (I'm not) to agree with the exhortation in Ephesians 6:12, attributed to the Apostle Paul: "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." The added insult is that we, U.S citizen taxpayers, fund the wickedness we are forced to wrestle against.
This is great news. If you haven't seen it yet, I urge everybody to check out Tucker Carlson's interview with Mike Benz that just dropped. It is the most mind blowing indictment of the censorship industrial complex you will ever hear. It already has 22 million views on Twitter.
This is journalism, and a huge win for We the People. The criminals have been outed.
They must be held accountable as they violated their oath of office and did not defend the constitution. It is not about advancing RFK although he is certainly a beneficiary.
A huge victory to secure free speech. Now let us insist the Supreme Court does the right thing, the spotlight is on them!
okay, I'm confused. no date or link to a new injunction in the article. I thought that the original injunction was brought by Judge Doughty, last summer, and then SCOTUS, at the behest of the current regime, put a 'stay' on that injunction. so this is saying that Doughty has put another injunction on the government? if this is not reporting NEW action on this case, then its reporting OLD news. can anyone clarify this?
I was confused initially also. I think the answer is this. RFK Jr.'s suit is almost identical to Missouri v Biden, the case at SCOTUS. The same circuit judge is handling both cases. These cases were not combined, so activity on Bobby's continued. The author failed to post the link to the latest decision. The judge effectively put another injunction on government actors and others on Bobby's case, and stayed it as Missouri v Biden was stayed.
I was in the police for eight years and every time they have a win in court, they go to the pub that night to celebrate because, regardless of what happens in higher courts, public opinion will always side with that first victory.
One doen't have to be a Christian (I'm not) to agree with the exhortation in Ephesians 6:12, attributed to the Apostle Paul: "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." The added insult is that we, U.S citizen taxpayers, fund the wickedness we are forced to wrestle against.
Thank goodness there is at least one competent and moral Judge!
Good work! A collective sigh of relief -- but still proceeding with care and cautious optimism...
A great win. Lets hope it changes behaviors. Lets extend that win by demanding that Julian Assange be freed.
Wow! Bravo!
Thats' the Best news I've heard all month..! Congrats to Legal Team Kennedy!
Does this mean YouTube can no longer ban me for no reason given?
AmCit
Fabulous! The truth can only stay dormant for so long; it is slowly rising to the surface. Excellent job!
This is great news. If you haven't seen it yet, I urge everybody to check out Tucker Carlson's interview with Mike Benz that just dropped. It is the most mind blowing indictment of the censorship industrial complex you will ever hear. It already has 22 million views on Twitter.
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1758529993280205039?s=20
This is journalism, and a huge win for We the People. The criminals have been outed.
They must be held accountable as they violated their oath of office and did not defend the constitution. It is not about advancing RFK although he is certainly a beneficiary.
A huge victory to secure free speech. Now let us insist the Supreme Court does the right thing, the spotlight is on them!
Bravo!
👍💕❤️🙏
okay, I'm confused. no date or link to a new injunction in the article. I thought that the original injunction was brought by Judge Doughty, last summer, and then SCOTUS, at the behest of the current regime, put a 'stay' on that injunction. so this is saying that Doughty has put another injunction on the government? if this is not reporting NEW action on this case, then its reporting OLD news. can anyone clarify this?
I was confused initially also. I think the answer is this. RFK Jr.'s suit is almost identical to Missouri v Biden, the case at SCOTUS. The same circuit judge is handling both cases. These cases were not combined, so activity on Bobby's continued. The author failed to post the link to the latest decision. The judge effectively put another injunction on government actors and others on Bobby's case, and stayed it as Missouri v Biden was stayed.
ah, thank you. I was under the impression that they WERE in fact linked.
Glad I helped.
It was consolidated but supreme crt denied intervening
I'm holding my breath; it's too good, too honest to not be evilly attacked.
I was in the police for eight years and every time they have a win in court, they go to the pub that night to celebrate because, regardless of what happens in higher courts, public opinion will always side with that first victory.
Excellent work!
Richard C. Cook
https://www.claritypress.com/product/our-country-then-and-now/