27 Comments
User's avatar
Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

This is a step in a right direction, but I just hope that it's for true health versus more pharma driven help. Pharma driven help has got us into this mess to begin with.

I know because this is my background: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/adhd-and-me-how-the-narrative-broke

From the health care background, the more we spend on "treatments," the more disease we get. Lowering these drugs results in better outcomes. We've seen these in so many conditions, obesity as well.

Hopefully this funding can unearth some of these data points. Here are some other articles on the topic:

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/modern-medicine-as-poison

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-childs-death-was-statistically

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

As soon as RFK and the Admin have removed 55 of 88 Quaxcines from the "schedule"

and funded monies for health improvement we have this turd: (Credit Natalie Winters

Jan 6)

The swamp is deep and wide:

An exclusive review of Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grants reveal nearly $350 million in taxpayer funds funneled into vaccine promotion campaigns to combat “misinformation” and “vaccine hesitancy.”

Many of these grants - which cover 40 states and 7 territories - focus on promoting vaccine use among children. Despite HHS removing the Hepatitis B vaccine from the children’s immunization schedule, million-dollar grants have gone towards promoting this vaccine in children.

In plain terms: public money is being used to change what Americans think. Skepticism itself is treated as a public health threat.

The 54 grants totaling $338.36 million began on July 1st 2025 and are slated to end June 30th, 2030.

Universal Vaccines

One state, Maine, is using the funds to roll out a Universal Adult Immunization program.

“A significant component of MIP’s future efforts involves developing a universal adult immunization program, ensuring equitable vaccine access for individuals over 19 while reducing healthcare costs,” summarizes the Maine grant. “Through sustained funding, MIP aims to safeguard public health by ensuring vaccine accessibility, countering misinformation, and maintaining high immunization rates across Maine,” it continues.

Children Are the Target

A major share of the funding focuses on child vaccination campaigns, including school-linked outreach and parent-directed messaging. Even more striking: several programs explicitly promote Hepatitis B vaccines for children, pouring millions into awareness and compliance campaigns.

Some grants are quite explicit: “increased access to vaccines for eligible children.”

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

Treatments are the Medical Cartels answer to the fictitious viral cause of illness or worse

latent Quaxcine damage. As a quick trip to Costo illustrates Americans score very low on health awareness. MAHA implies that the Gubmint can fix this... Do not see evidence that this is efficient or possible. Time will show, it always does.

In the interim phase stop toxic imputs and educate while remediating the soil.

Expand full comment
Valerie Grimes, Hypnotist's avatar

Praying the states use the funding wisely.

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

Wishful thinking. That never happens.

Expand full comment
Lisa's avatar

What does that mean? More access to drugs? Better health care would be community organic gardens. Affordable housing. Less polluting in our soil, water and air by corporations. Sorry but it’s all bu**sg*t.

Expand full comment
PurpleKay's avatar

Yes, organic, community gardens.

Expand full comment
Margretta Chase's avatar

I see prevention of chronic diseases mentioned. Does this mean the funds will be used for REAL Healthcare or just more SickCare?

Expand full comment
Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

Margretta, I just commented a similar thought. Hopefully real healthcare, but we can only hope

Expand full comment
Frank A Vish JR's avatar

That's a good question. After cv19 I dont trust mds, hospitals or medical groups. And it seems to me that the FDA will continue to try to take healthy food, supplements and natural treatments off the market.

Expand full comment
Margretta Chase's avatar

Indeed! Big Pharma and the Insurance Mafia want to take all our money so we can’t afford Chiropractic care or other alternative care. Just disease and drug dealer’s monopoly: no healers, just Dealers. Medicare handbook is lies-says unlimited Chiropractic care: in reality, just six visits per episode is covered. I went for two years before till they finally cut me off. I don’t do business with the dealers.

Expand full comment
Margretta Chase's avatar

Will set us up to fail with their scam tests and poison drugs.

Expand full comment
Margretta Chase's avatar

Indeed! The truth is out with their creation of Covid. Seems the medical groups are scammers, cheaters, liars and thieves: the Devil’s Disciples against health and humanity.

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Doesn't make sense. $100 million for each state and not based proportionality on population?

Expand full comment
Jason Dunn's avatar

This money will get lost in CA, unaccounted for, and split amongst the greedy politicians.

Expand full comment
Paul Thomas's avatar

I hope they have systems in place so that the States cannot use any of this money to promote vaccines. Money without oversight will get us more of the same.

Expand full comment
John Day MD's avatar

Thank You, John.

I am curious about what "improve" might mean in practice (Bill Clinton style definition?).

Expand full comment
ForestDi56's avatar

Depends on where the money actually winds up. In which pockets or accounts. My bet is the clinics and hospitals see very little of that money.

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

As soon as RFK and the Admin have removed 55 of 88 Quaxcines from the "schedule"

and funded monies for health improvement we have this turd: (Credit Natalie Winters

Jan 6)

The swamp is deep and wide:

An exclusive review of Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grants reveal nearly $350 million in taxpayer funds funneled into vaccine promotion campaigns to combat “misinformation” and “vaccine hesitancy.”

Many of these grants - which cover 40 states and 7 territories - focus on promoting vaccine use among children. Despite HHS removing the Hepatitis B vaccine from the children’s immunization schedule, million-dollar grants have gone towards promoting this vaccine in children.

In plain terms: public money is being used to change what Americans think. Skepticism itself is treated as a public health threat.

The 54 grants totaling $338.36 million began on July 1st 2025 and are slated to end June 30th, 2030.

Universal Vaccines

One state, Maine, is using the funds to roll out a Universal Adult Immunization program.

“A significant component of MIP’s future efforts involves developing a universal adult immunization program, ensuring equitable vaccine access for individuals over 19 while reducing healthcare costs,” summarizes the Maine grant. “Through sustained funding, MIP aims to safeguard public health by ensuring vaccine accessibility, countering misinformation, and maintaining high immunization rates across Maine,” it continues.

Children Are the Target

A major share of the funding focuses on child vaccination campaigns, including school-linked outreach and parent-directed messaging. Even more striking: several programs explicitly promote Hepatitis B vaccines for children, pouring millions into awareness and compliance campaigns.

Some grants are quite explicit: “increased access to vaccines for eligible children.”

Expand full comment
PurpleKay's avatar

No more pharma...

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

Just keeps getting better. DJT announced today that the tariffs kick in so its very easy to see that funding is available. Massive fraudsters cut off.

Several more quaxs removed today from the "schedule".

Venezuelan election grifting circling the bowl...

Expand full comment
Neural Foundry's avatar

The scoring system that prioritizes 'greatest potential for impact' is interesting but potentially problematic. States with existing infrastructure will score better than those starting from scratch, which could deepen existing dispariteis in rural healthcare access. I've seen similar grant structures where well-resourced applicants dominate becuase they can afford the pre-work. The prevention focus is solid but watch the implementation timelines - rural provider networks move slow and CMS has a track record of pulling funding when early metrics don't pop fast enough.

Expand full comment
Patricia Burke's avatar

The problem with "technology at scale" is that this may be used to justify more wireless infrastructure, including more 5G and 6G. which is a key contributor to health harm.

Unless MAHA gets on board to confront the outdated FCC guidelines, like the misbegotten morally absolute "sustainability" advocates, this may be a death sentence for human health and nature. In addition, consumers have already paid repeatedly to provide rural coverage, as reported by the Irregulators. https://irregulators.org/ Please consider the issue of hard-wired vs wireless connectivity, and do not be co-opted by the wireless industry and its regulators and payrolled politicians.

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

Just more bullshit.

Expand full comment
Commoncents's avatar

NY needs to set up VA hospitals or offices in rural areas.

Expand full comment